Jean's Reviews > Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court

Justice on Trial by Mollie Hemingway
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
23100707
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: audio-book, biography, history, legal, non-fiction, politics, supreme-court, us-history

Mollie Hemingway is the senior editor at the Federalist. The Federalist is a conservative web magazine and podcast. Carrie Severino is Chief Counsel and Policy Director of the Judicial Crisis Network. The JCN is a conservative activist political campaign organization. Severino also was a law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas.

The book is well written and researched. The authors attempted to be neutral in their presentation, but the conservative leaning comes through. I like to study a situation from all view points before I develop an opinion. Accordingly, I have been reading a variety of books including books about the Supreme Court confirmation process. The authors provided a history of the confirmation process to the Supreme Court and then a detailed account of the Kavanaugh hearing. They also spent a chapter discussing originalism vs activism. They did not cover the role of Senator Mitch McConnell in accelerating polarization in the confirmation process. I was already familiar with the majority of the information, but I did discover some new information that had not been previously covered. I found the information about the Supreme Court’s law clerks most interesting.

I read this as an audiobook downloaded from Audible. The book is eleven hours and fifteen minutes. Mollie Hemingway does a good job narrating the book.
61 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Justice on Trial.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 25, 2019 – Started Reading
August 25, 2019 – Shelved
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: audio-book
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: biography
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: history
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: legal
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: non-fiction
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: politics
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: supreme-court
September 3, 2019 – Shelved as: us-history
September 3, 2019 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dmitri (new)

Dmitri Thank you for the review. I want to read a detailed account of the Kavanaugh hearing. Certainly it was covered extensively in the press. But without the role of McConnell and other key players I’m afraid that something’s been left out, as you seem to indicate.


Jean Dmitri wrote: "Thank you for the review. I want to read a detailed account of the Kavanaugh hearing. Certainly it was covered extensively in the press. But without the role of McConnell and other key players I'm afraid that something's been left out, as you seem to indicate."

Thanks Dmitri for your comment. I think that I will need to read a variety of viewpoint books to paste the truth together. The partisan fighting has gotten to the point no one seems to want to step back and analyze the situation from a neutral viewpoint. Maybe it is to soon for the journalist and historian to research and write an in-depth, neutral/academic evaluation about the Kavanaugh hearings.


Jamie Thometz I found the book very interesting but sad. The process that leads to confirmation has become so hateful, divisive and political. i support the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh


Jean Jamie wrote: "I found the book very interesting but sad. The process that leads to confirmation has become so hateful, divisive and political. I support the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh."

Thanks, Jamie for your comment. I agree with you. Something needs to change in how the confirmation hearings are conducted. I know one can not regulate good manner and being non-political but some guidelines need to be set to reduce the political fighting. I find it all disgusting. And I feel sorry for the pending Justice. Who would accept the role of a Justice if they have their life torn apart in public.


back to top