Shovelmonkey1's Reviews > The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (Chronicles of Narnia, #1)
by C.S. Lewis
by C.S. Lewis
Shovelmonkey1's review
bookshelves: inner-child, fantasy-fantastic, travel-books
Feb 28, 2012
bookshelves: inner-child, fantasy-fantastic, travel-books
Read on January 01, 1992
,
read count: many times
The Role (bibli)call:
The big cuddly cat = Jesus. Strange that a lion should be chosen to represent the big man when Lions are notoriously aggressive, solitary carnivores who are more likely to eat any potential apostles than than teach or lead them.
The white witch = Satan or Eve the temptress depending on which side of the tree of knowledge you're most likely to be barking up. Famed for a monochrome wardrobe in the A/W line only. Like Alan Rickman in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, she has cancelled Christmas.
Edmund = Judas Iscariot. Judas has been proven to be a more astute bargain maker and walks off with 30 pieces of silver for his denials. Edmund gets a box of sweets.
Lucy, Peter, Susan = apostles, knights and other positive biblical forces. An unusual scenario given the general hoo-hah about whether or not any of apostles were female (see last supper male/female image debate).
Mr Tumnus the faun = an aberration. With his goat like legs and general caprine features you might be forgiven for imagining that he might be an agent of Satan, or Pan or some other pagan deity. Nope. He's on the side of good and not evil and that there throws the nice set of biblical allusions into chaos.
Beavers, birds, satyrs, fauns and other ancillary creatures = collateral damage.
Plot summary: Icing sugar, picture perfect winter wonderland accessible through the rear of roomy wardrobe handily equipped with high-end (but non PETA approved) all weather garb. Ruled in supremely effective manner by single minded, highly organised, independent woman until arrival of children and large pet. Maybe this book is actually a metaphor for home life in the modern age.
The big cuddly cat = Jesus. Strange that a lion should be chosen to represent the big man when Lions are notoriously aggressive, solitary carnivores who are more likely to eat any potential apostles than than teach or lead them.
The white witch = Satan or Eve the temptress depending on which side of the tree of knowledge you're most likely to be barking up. Famed for a monochrome wardrobe in the A/W line only. Like Alan Rickman in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, she has cancelled Christmas.
Edmund = Judas Iscariot. Judas has been proven to be a more astute bargain maker and walks off with 30 pieces of silver for his denials. Edmund gets a box of sweets.
Lucy, Peter, Susan = apostles, knights and other positive biblical forces. An unusual scenario given the general hoo-hah about whether or not any of apostles were female (see last supper male/female image debate).
Mr Tumnus the faun = an aberration. With his goat like legs and general caprine features you might be forgiven for imagining that he might be an agent of Satan, or Pan or some other pagan deity. Nope. He's on the side of good and not evil and that there throws the nice set of biblical allusions into chaos.
Beavers, birds, satyrs, fauns and other ancillary creatures = collateral damage.
Plot summary: Icing sugar, picture perfect winter wonderland accessible through the rear of roomy wardrobe handily equipped with high-end (but non PETA approved) all weather garb. Ruled in supremely effective manner by single minded, highly organised, independent woman until arrival of children and large pet. Maybe this book is actually a metaphor for home life in the modern age.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
| 03/10/2016 | marked as: | read | ||
Comments (showing 1-31 of 31) (31 new)
date
newest »
newest »
i absolutely adore this whole Narnia series though am half hearted about 'A Horse and his boy' but this review really made me laugh as did Richard's comment.'Ruled in supremely effective manner by single minded, highly organised, independent woman until arrival of children and large pet'
that is such a wonderfully dismissive sentence I think I shall have to start a new collection. This will be a new collection to go with all those fabulous one line reviews that can be encountered on these pages.
Ambrose Bierce is a California author known for his cynical humor. "The Devil's Dictionary" is formatted like a regular dictionary, but with humorous definitions and poems. For instance, this is how he defines marriage:
Marriage, n. The state or condition of a community consisting of a master, a mistress, and two slaves, making in all, two."
There are several editions. I had to read the unabridged version for college. It's longer and has a lot of notes.
Hope this helps. :)
I believe that Lewis chose a Lion, which is typically aggressive because human beings can be very aggressive, and Jesus was the human being the way we were meant to be. So using a Lion that is tame (yet also powerful) was his comparison to human beings.
A said:- "So using a Lion that is tame (yet also powerful) was his comparison to human beings."Sorry to be a tad anally retentive but isn't that the very opposite of what Mr Beaver says to Lucy as Aslan walks off without saying goodbye when he tells her ' He doesn't like being tied down........He'll often drop in. Only you mustn't press him. He's wild, you know. Not like a tame lion'
Good point about the lion: Jesus is more usually associated with a lamb or a dove, but I suppose it would have been a less exciting story.As for Bierce's "Devil's Dictionary", you can browse it here: http://www.thedevilsdictionary.com/
Listin wrote: "worst review"Shovelmonkey needs no noble Knight to come to fight her corner I realize but I would point out, Listin, its what one often calls humour on this site. I love the Narnia chronicles myself but can still recognize a clever concept review when i read one.
Mark thanks for your point even now i didn't realize the humor you are talking about seriously i didn't know how English men makes jokes :-)
Listin wrote: "Mark thanks for your point even now i didn't realize the humor you are talking about seriously i didn't know how English men makes jokes :-)"
Don't worry Listin. Lots of the comments I make which I think are funny I often find I am the only person who does so perhaps I am not the best of Englishmen from which to take a course in british humour . Happy reading
Listin wrote: "worst review"Just noticed this comment-thanks for the input - duly noted - care to elaborate? I thought i might look at what your thoughts were but it appears you don't write reviews.
Listin wrote: "Mark thanks for your point even now i didn't realize the humor you are talking about seriously i didn't know how English men makes jokes :-)"
And thanks for the chivalry ;)
For Christ as a lion, you need to know the biblical background Lewis had in mind. Genesis 49:8-12 speaks of Judah, one of the twelve tribes of Israel, as a lion and says the tribe would be the source of a ruler. This was understood to be fulfilled in King David. The prophets spoke of a coming Savior-King (Messiah) who would be a descendant of David. Christians believe that Jesus is that Messiah (= Christ). See Revelation 5:5, which refers to Christ as "the Lion of Judah". In the next verse he appears as a lamb. Complicated, yes, but I am sure Lewis was well aware of it.
There's something very "peacable kingdom" about Narnia, too (despite the violence) what with all the animal species getting along based on moral choices rather than the food chain.
If nothing else I should have remembered haille Selassie and the lion of Judah! What was I thinking?
I did find the review kind of funny, but I also reject any one interpretation of any book, regardless of authorial intent. books are what you get out of them, not what the author wanted you to get. I'm reading this book for the first time right now, like it so far.
The reason god is represented as a lion is because lions symbolize a "king" of animals just like god is king of all the people. Also a lion represents power and loyalty and courage and lastly, god is referred to in the bible as a lion ( the lion and the lamb)
Your review made me laugh! I loved this book. I didn't know it reflected religion until someone mentioned that to me. At which point I said, oh yea, I guess it is. I see that now!
Matthew wrote: "I did find the review kind of funny, but I also reject any one interpretation of any book, regardless of authorial intent. books are what you get out of them, not what the author wanted you to get..."Thanks - it is a much beloved classic so only gentle fun poking was intended here. It was one of my favourite books as a child, long before I saw any religious inference in the stories.
Lions aren't solitary creatures. They have a pack mentality. Tigers are solitary animals. A famous magician inches said that he'd much rather work with a pack if tigers then lions. At least if he got stuck in a cage with the tigers they would be more preoccupied on getting rid of each other then him. If he was stuck in a cage with lions, they would quickly figure out a hierarchy system and then focus all their attention on him.
Jesus is known as the lion of the tribe of Judah. That is why a lion was used. This topic talks about the lack of gentiles. All animation mysteriously does not have them. There is an undercurrent of hatred for them from the devil himself through people.
I read it when I first came to the U.S.and my English was limited. I didn't grasp the fact that the book was about good and evil



[image error]