James Kemp's Reviews > Destructive and Formidable: British Infantry Firepower 1642 - 1765

Destructive and Formidable by David John Blackmore
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6824106
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: 17th-century, c17, c18, colonial, history, infantry, owned, operational-research, revolution-1688, reference

Destructive and Formidable is a quantitative look at British infantry doctrine using period sources from the British Civil Wars of the seventeenth century up to just before the Napoleonic wars. If anything you can see the constancy, which drove the success in battle of British forces, even when outnumbered.

As a wargame designer this has got all the detail I need to model infantry battles in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. There are comparative weights and rates of fire. Measured hit rates based on range, and commentary on doctrine and how certain tactics worked in certain situations but not others. In short everything you need to design a game (although there's clearly a morale factor, which Destructive and Formidable covers but makes no attempt to quantify).

There's a fairly readable style, and the book isn't long. The examples are of individual battles and focus only on what the British infantry did, their immediate context and the doctrine/tactics of their immediate enemy. The only place there's anything more in context, and discussion of the commanders impact is the chapter on the North American irregular wars. This latter chapter also touches on failures of leadership, and shows that there is an effect of good leadership on the successful application of doctrine. The defeats are more attributable to poor leadership and lack of confidence than to failure of doctrine.

That said I was left with two questions. The main one being that if British doctrine was so successful why did other nations not copy it? Also what characterised the successful leaders from those that failed? Blackmore shows a relative isolation in the British officer corps from the debate of firepower vs shock which European armies seem to have spent the period arguing about. British doctrine seems to have developed by trial and error during the British civil wars to get decisive battles based on the available people and technology. Early civil war battles were inconclusive, yet the British on both sides strove to improve effectiveness. They got closer before opening fire, massed to fire salvos and closed with the enemy to finish them off. Europe spent the same period in the Thirty Years War yet never came to the same conclusion. Drill manuals from the period emphasise fire, the cavalry doctrine shows shock of impact is what works.

My suspicion is one of the main things that keeps the British Army successful in this period is a continuity of experience. From the civil wars there is a near continuous presence of warfare. More importantly the outcome of the civil war is the establishment of a standing army. Even though this is supposed to be temporary, Parliament needs to renew it every year, it remains continuously in being. This means that soldiers pass on their experience to the new recruits, and many officers are professionals. Serving in one war as juniors and returning to later wars as commanders of battalions and armies.

My copy of this is flagged in many places, and there are a lot of marginal notations. I fully expect to use it as the core of an infantry combat model for one or more games. There's a good model explained in the book. Maximum effective range is about 80 yards, at 100 yards less than 1% of shots result in a casualty. At 25-30 yards about a quarter of shots cause casualties. Closing with the enemy is pretty much always decisive (they either break or die). Infantry firing by platoon can stop cavalry with firepower alone if they reserve fire until the cavalry is about 30 yards away. Similarly if you fire at charging Highlanders at about 10 yards (or less) then it ends the charge...
flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Destructive and Formidable.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 27, 2018 – Started Reading
December 26, 2018 – Finished Reading
December 27, 2018 – Shelved
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: 17th-century
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: c17
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: c18
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: colonial
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: history
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: infantry
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: owned
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: operational-research
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: revolution-1688
December 27, 2018 – Shelved as: reference

No comments have been added yet.