Paul Bryant's Reviews > HHhH
HHhH
by
by
REVIEW : SHORT VERSION
This is a hell of a story, told very engagingly. The last 50 pages are agonizing and heroic and you won’t forget them. Recommended.
REVIEW : LONG VERSION : A QUESTION OF DEFINITION
If I waddled around in an elaborate penguin costume loudly proclaiming that I was a penguin while swallowing fish whole, it wouldn’t make me a penguin. Even if I got all my friends to violently nod their heads and point at me and say yes, he’s a great old penguin, that one, sure he is. Even if I took a plane to Antarctica and joined one of the vast throngs of penguins there, and you filmed me David Attenborough-style, creeping up on me real close while I was looking after my egg which I got a friend to make for me before I came, looks pretty realistic, I still wouldn’t be a penguin.
Whatever everybody – the author, all the critics, and every last review says, this is not a novel. But Mr Binet persuaded the entire universe to go along with his penguin impersonation. And before him, other books have done this too :
Bartleby & Co – a long biographical essay about writers – not a novel
Problems, The Wallcreeper, Love Me Back, What is the What and a zillion others – memoirs, not novels
The Pale King - a random collection of experimental writings, not a novel
None of HHhH is fictitious, it’s either the precise historical information about the events leading to the assassination of one of the all time hall of fame Nazi bastards Reinhard Heydrich – presented in a refreshing casual conversational style (“anyway, let’s talk about something else” he says at one point) but still accurate (getting the details right is one of the main things LB agonises over) or it’s LB’s personal commentary about how he got this book written and the research he did and the problems he found, including such hilarious stuff as telling us that he should have bought a particular book online from Amazon since it was Heydrich’s widow’s memoir (pretty relevant) but he didn’t because it was too pricey and in the wrong language. Several pages later he tells us he finally did get it.
This whole kind of jokey (but really, about such a grisly no-joke subject) self-dramatising angst-ridden approach is exactly the same as a brilliant book by Geoff Dyer called Out of Sheer Rage , an account of how he didn’t write a book about DH Lawrence. Geoff could have called his book a novel, but for some reason he didn’t. Oh wait, that would be because it wasn’t a novel.
What about historical novels like Schindler’s Ark, I Claudius, Wolf Hall, etc? Well in those you can see all the novelistic art, the dialogues, the plotting, the inhabiting of the famous person’s brain and so forth so yes, they are novels.
SOME QUOTES
Unbelievable – I’ve just found another book about the assassination! It’s called Like a Man and it’s by a certain David Chacko. The book is extremely well researched. I get the impression the author has utilized everything currently known about Heydrich and the attack … [LB discusses this novel for a page, pointing out some stuff Chacko made up completely e.g. some sexual scenes]…He’s a skillful cheat. A trickster. Well…a novelist, basically.
[as opposed to LB himself!]
If this were a novel I would have absolutely no need for Valcik. He is more of an encumbrance than anything else
[so, it’s not a novel]
I don’t even know how they reacted when they heard about Heydrich’s death, although that ought to make one of the best bits of my book.
My story has as many holes in it as a novel. But in an ordinary novel, it is the novelist who decides where these holes should occur. Because I am a slave to my scruples, I’m incapable of making that decision.
[so, it’s not….]
LAST MINUTE UPRUSH OF STARS
Around two thirds the way through I was getting a little tired of Mr Binet’s posturings (“look at me having problems writing my book, let me tell you all about them”) and frankly this is way too horrible a subject to be parading like a loud peacock with a tail of woe – just shut up and get on with it – but the last third gets a mighty grip as the assassination plan springs into life and all of what followed makes this – almost – a must read, & swerved the rating from a huffy 2.5 stars to a confident 4 stars.
This is a hell of a story, told very engagingly. The last 50 pages are agonizing and heroic and you won’t forget them. Recommended.
REVIEW : LONG VERSION : A QUESTION OF DEFINITION
If I waddled around in an elaborate penguin costume loudly proclaiming that I was a penguin while swallowing fish whole, it wouldn’t make me a penguin. Even if I got all my friends to violently nod their heads and point at me and say yes, he’s a great old penguin, that one, sure he is. Even if I took a plane to Antarctica and joined one of the vast throngs of penguins there, and you filmed me David Attenborough-style, creeping up on me real close while I was looking after my egg which I got a friend to make for me before I came, looks pretty realistic, I still wouldn’t be a penguin.
Whatever everybody – the author, all the critics, and every last review says, this is not a novel. But Mr Binet persuaded the entire universe to go along with his penguin impersonation. And before him, other books have done this too :
Bartleby & Co – a long biographical essay about writers – not a novel
Problems, The Wallcreeper, Love Me Back, What is the What and a zillion others – memoirs, not novels
The Pale King - a random collection of experimental writings, not a novel
None of HHhH is fictitious, it’s either the precise historical information about the events leading to the assassination of one of the all time hall of fame Nazi bastards Reinhard Heydrich – presented in a refreshing casual conversational style (“anyway, let’s talk about something else” he says at one point) but still accurate (getting the details right is one of the main things LB agonises over) or it’s LB’s personal commentary about how he got this book written and the research he did and the problems he found, including such hilarious stuff as telling us that he should have bought a particular book online from Amazon since it was Heydrich’s widow’s memoir (pretty relevant) but he didn’t because it was too pricey and in the wrong language. Several pages later he tells us he finally did get it.
This whole kind of jokey (but really, about such a grisly no-joke subject) self-dramatising angst-ridden approach is exactly the same as a brilliant book by Geoff Dyer called Out of Sheer Rage , an account of how he didn’t write a book about DH Lawrence. Geoff could have called his book a novel, but for some reason he didn’t. Oh wait, that would be because it wasn’t a novel.
What about historical novels like Schindler’s Ark, I Claudius, Wolf Hall, etc? Well in those you can see all the novelistic art, the dialogues, the plotting, the inhabiting of the famous person’s brain and so forth so yes, they are novels.
SOME QUOTES
Unbelievable – I’ve just found another book about the assassination! It’s called Like a Man and it’s by a certain David Chacko. The book is extremely well researched. I get the impression the author has utilized everything currently known about Heydrich and the attack … [LB discusses this novel for a page, pointing out some stuff Chacko made up completely e.g. some sexual scenes]…He’s a skillful cheat. A trickster. Well…a novelist, basically.
[as opposed to LB himself!]
If this were a novel I would have absolutely no need for Valcik. He is more of an encumbrance than anything else
[so, it’s not a novel]
I don’t even know how they reacted when they heard about Heydrich’s death, although that ought to make one of the best bits of my book.
My story has as many holes in it as a novel. But in an ordinary novel, it is the novelist who decides where these holes should occur. Because I am a slave to my scruples, I’m incapable of making that decision.
[so, it’s not….]
LAST MINUTE UPRUSH OF STARS
Around two thirds the way through I was getting a little tired of Mr Binet’s posturings (“look at me having problems writing my book, let me tell you all about them”) and frankly this is way too horrible a subject to be parading like a loud peacock with a tail of woe – just shut up and get on with it – but the last third gets a mighty grip as the assassination plan springs into life and all of what followed makes this – almost – a must read, & swerved the rating from a huffy 2.5 stars to a confident 4 stars.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
HHhH.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 18, 2018
– Shelved
June 18, 2018
– Shelved as:
to-read-novels
August 13, 2018
–
Started Reading
August 20, 2018
– Shelved as:
history-will-teach-us-nothing
August 20, 2018
– Shelved as:
novels
August 20, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)
date
newest »
newest »
I think it might irritate you!Regarding Love me Back :
Love Me Back is a highly autobiographical first novel; now living in Denton, Tierce was herself a teenage mother who soon became a single mom and supported her family waitressing at Dallas restaurants. Although Tierce subsequently acquired a pedigree that screams “literary fiction”—a master’s degree in creative writing from the University of Iowa’s highly regarded program and a couple of prestigious young-writer awards for her stories—her debut novel has a working-class authenticity that can’t be picked up in writing workshops.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/the-cult...
I don't know what it is with you. No, let me be specific. I don't know what it is with your review writing style. It isn't normal (read: like everyone else's). It's odd (note I chose not to write weird). It's often filled with analogies, or at the very least with fantasy-like introductions involving animals. Having said that, I should also note that finding a good book, or finding a book good, a highly personal matter. This I have learned after my revitalisation of book reading the past few years, and using GR as my guiding compass (well, my autistic reading record). On top of that, one cannot read ALL reviews that are out there. So really, when I do read the reviews, which is always, chances are 99.9% that GR gives me the normal reviews.
I don't have many friends, I follow a few more others on here, and there you have it. You are the 0.1%. YOU. Well. Your reviews are. You will statistically be right in the middle of the 99.9%. As will I.
Your reviews make it all worthwhile. They are real. They are what get me up in the morning, to open my phone and scroll through GR. I add the books to my Tsondoku-list (look that up, yes please), and think "Thank God, there's someone who is awake when he writes". Keep them coming. Separate the wheat from the chaff. For us, so we don't have to do it.
When I read "I don't know what it is with you" I thought uh-oh, next is going to be "you don't have the slightest notion of what you are talking about"... but it wasn't.... so thanks a lot!One thing I have noticed, and Hhhh is a good example, is that often there is something glaringly obvious about a book which so many reviewers don't even mention - in this case, the fact that - apparently - novels now are absolutely anything anyone says they are. But if you think words should still have stable definitions, this isn't a novel.
But I hadn't noticed the thing about animals.... hmmmm what could that mean
You’re welcome. The lack of emoji’s in there might have thrown you off, but I tried to be funny, and odd, trying to imitate you. :-) the praise is real though. I’ve located a copy of HHhH and hope to have it on my coffee table soon. With the reading challenge already met, I can devote the remaining months in 2018 on WW2 books, which funny enough I’ve been finding & adding to the list. This review came very timely.
Did you look up Tsondoku?
Interesting article Paul (though the second half of it goes down a Texas-specific rabbit hole no doubt more interesting to locals), I guess the question is just how autobiographical it is. I'm going to hope, not too much...
Just noticed that your 'Reading progress' reveals that you labelled it 'novels'.....Now I'm confused! :)
Ah - Tsundoku - (informal) the act of leaving a book unread after buying it, typically piled up together with such other unread books.
Paul. I am relieved that your penguin analogy didn't stray into gender politics. It looked to me for a moment as though you were on thin ice there. So to speak.
Yes - now that the government is making it easier for people to declare themselves to be penguins, the whole thing is a minefield.
I think we should just recognise that many individuals are species-fluid and leave it at that. If a man identifies as a disgusting pig or a woman as a complete bitch, or if either one identifies as a penguin, then that is their right. We shouldn't require them to have surgery.
well you liberals will be singing a different song when the streets are thronged with spiny echidna, wombats, birds of paradise and golden tamarinds all having declared themselves to be human. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

And nice review, my wife has a copy of this one, sounds like maybe it's worth reading, though I'm really not a fan of that kind of author cutesiness.