Roy Lotz's Reviews > The Age of Napoleon

The Age of Napoleon by Will Durant
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
14046996
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: one-damn-thing-after-another, eurotrip

Finally I have come to the last book in this series. It was four long years ago when I first read The Life of Greece; and these have been the four most educational years of my life, in part thanks to The Story of Civilization. Though I have had some occasions to criticize Durant over the years, the fact that I have dragged myself through ten lengthy volumes of his writing is compliment enough. Now all I need to do is to read the first volume of the series, Our Oriental Heritage, in order to bring my voyage to its end. (I originally skipped it because it struck me as absurd to squeeze all of Asia into one volume and then cover Europe in ten; but for the sake of completion I suppose I will have to read it.)

Durant did not plan to write this volume. His previous book, Rousseau and Revolution, ends with a final bow. But Durant lived longer than he anticipated (he died at 96), so he decided to devote his final years to a bonus book on Napoleon. It is extraordinarily impressive that he and his wife, Ariel, could have maintained the same high standard of writing for so many decades; there is no notable decline in quality in this volume, which makes me think that Durant should have written a book on healthy living, too.

The Age of Napoleon displays all of Durant’s typical merits and faults. The book begins with a bust: Durant rushes through the French Revolution, seeming bored by the whole affair, seeing the grand drama only as a disruptive prelude to Napoleon. This showcases Durant’s inability to write engagingly about processes and events; when there is no central actor on which to focus his attention, the writing becomes colorless and vague. Further, it also shows that Durant, while a strong writer, was a weak historian: he provides very little analysis or commentary on what is one of the most important and influential events in European history.

When Napoleon enters the scene, the book becomes appreciably more lively. For reasons that largely escape me, Durant was an unabashed admirer of the diminutive general, and sees in Napoleon an example of the farthest limits of human ability. Though normally uninterested in the details of battles and campaigns, Durant reveals a heretofore hidden talent for military narration as he covers Napoleon’s military triumphs and defeats. Some parts of the book, particularly near the end, are genuinely thrilling—an adjective that rarely comes to mind with Durant’s staid and steady style. Granted, he had an extraordinary story to tell; Napoleon’s rise, fall, rise again, and fall again are as epic as anything in Plutarch.

But as usual Durant shines most brightly in his sections on artists, poets, and philosophers. The greatest section of this book is that on the Romantic poets: Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, and Byron. (For some reason, Durant sees fit to exclude Keats, even though the scope of Keats’ life falls entirely within that of Napoleon.) Less engaging, though still worthwhile, was Durant’s section on the German idealist philosophers; and his miniature biography of Beethoven was a stirring tribute. Many writers who properly belong in this volume were, however, paid their respects in the previous, most notably Goya and Goethe, since Durant thought that this volume would never appear.

Though I am happy to reach the end, I am saddened that I cannot continue the story of Europe’s history any further forward with Durant. He is an inspiring guide to the continent's cultural treasures.
17 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Age of Napoleon.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 4, 2018 – Shelved
June 4, 2018 – Shelved as: to-read
Started Reading
December 20, 2018 – Finished Reading
December 22, 2018 – Shelved as: one-damn-thing-after-another
December 22, 2018 – Shelved as: eurotrip

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

10001010001 Congratulations!

This song might be fitting:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2RQ8Yk...


message 2: by Roy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Roy Lotz 10001010001 wrote: "Congratulations!

This song might be fitting:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2RQ8Yk..."


Thanks! I was thinking more Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture.


10001010001 That’s a pretty high-spirited choice :)

It’s funny that you found Durant’s presentation of the French Revolution inadequate. I remember myself flipping through the pages thinking “when is this muck gonna be over!!!” And then Napoleon, which at that time I couldn’t care less. There goes my ignorant days …

Personally I found it a shame that Durant didn’t get to tell the tale of mid-19th century intellectuals. He aged like a fine wine.


message 4: by loafingcactus (new)

loafingcactus Congratulations! I started but never got through book one.


message 5: by Roy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Roy Lotz loafingcactus wrote: "Congratulations! I started but never got through book one."

Thanks! I have heard that the first book is somewhat different from the rest.


back to top