J's Reviews > The Historian

The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review

really liked it

This novel is better than I had any anticipation of it being. I’d seen it among a friend’s luggage then later saw it at the library. Having just come off three weeks of nineteenth century novelists, I thought, Oh, something light would be a nice change. After all, I thought. Vampires. The book is about vampires. And not just any vampire, but the mack daddy himself, Dracula, the real Vlad the Impaler, who turns out to be the undead.

Light reading. Sure. Six hundred and fifty pages of vampires that is less concerned with torn pulsing arteries than with the minutiae of historical research. And much like Dracula, to which Kostova’ novel The Historian owes an incalculable debt (more so than many another vampire novel), the novel is constructed as a story within a story within a story.

One of the novel’s central conceits is how much of the story is told in the form of letters written by the young female narrator’s father. As this sum surpasses well over 300 pages in type, obvious plausibility considerations of scale arise, but only if you stop to think about it long enough. In the middle of the father Paul’s letters, he is handed a parcel of letters written by his mentor, Bartolomeo Rossi which are also substantially sized documents.

As their stories take them further and further into Eastern and Central Europe, the texts begin to shelter one inside the other inside the other like Russian nesting dolls. As the narrator reads the letters of her father, Paul tells of visiting a Bulgarian scholar who reads to him from a manuscript which includes in its history yet another person’s lengthy transcription of in fact one more person’s reminisces about Vlad Tepes. This kind of layered story is most definitely part of Kostova’s novel’s sensibility, and it’s rather an amusing in-joke.

What’s impressive about all this is how Kostova weaves three sizable narratives together, alternating time and place and narrative voice. We first are in Amsterdam of 1972 as our young narrator, a sixteen year old school girl, tells of discovering a mysterious volume in her diplomat father’s office and later of her journey to France. Part of what sends her out are the letters she is reading left to her by her father after he vanishes, telling of his travels and investigations into the Dracula legend in the 1950s Eastern Bloc. He is launched across the Soviet empire as well as through the byzantine mazes of Istanbul’s streets and libraries trying to discover what became of his missing mentor. Along the way as we try to find Rossi, we are told of his 1930s investigations into the Dracula legend in Romania.

On top of that, there are vast stores of erudition on fifteenth century monasteries, the cultural divide betwixt Romanians and Transylvanians, the Walechian court, medieval church politics, central European folk songs, Bulgarian religious rituals based around old pagan traditions, historian cataloging and research methodology, and the overlapping history of Central Europe with its shifting rulers of Ottomans, the Orthodox church and its tiny fiefdoms, and the Soviet Union. For, thinking about it as an historian, the undead would have lived through an impressive array of eras.

Consider this rather late passage:

The “Chronicle” of Zacharias is known through two manuscripts, Athos 1480 and R.VII.132; the latter is also referred to as the “Patriarchal Version.” Athos 1480, a quarto manuscript in a single semiunical hand, is house in the library at Rila Monastery in Bulgaria, where it was discovered in 1923…This original manuscript was probably housed in the Zographou library until at least 1814, since it is mentioned by title in a bibliography of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century manuscripts at Zographou dating from that year. It resurfaced in Bulgaria in 1923, when the Bulgarian historian Atanas Angelov discovered it hidden in the cover of an eighteenth-century folio treatise on the life of Saint George (Georgi 1364.21) in the library at Rila Monastery….The second and only other known copy or version of the Zacharias “Chronicle” — R.VII.132 or the “Patriarchal Version” — is housed at the library of the Oecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople and has been paleographically dated to the mid- or late sixteenth century.

Not your average vampire book, eh?

And that’s one of the funny things about reading this novel. At times, you have to remind yourself that this is a book about vampires. Not that Kostova won’t remind you at some point along the way herself, but that there is so much enjoyable writing throughout, so much fun detective work, that at times the supernatural element seems almost decidedly secondary.

Kostova knows well enough to keep the monsters off the stage as long as possible, merely make suggestive shadows lurk here and there on the periphery and affect a rather creepy atmosphere. After a point there are a hair too many overt murders that sap some of the menace, surprisingly, as they make the gathering darkness all too palpably concrete. Then there are a number of vampire staples that might turn up normally anyway. A bat flitters across a night sky. In the woods near a ruin, a wolf approaches the edge of the firelight. After sitting for some time near a railing cobby with webs, Helen Rossi, daughter of Paul’s mentor and mother to the unnamed young narrator, ends up with an enormous spider on her back. These stand-ins for the vampire are pleasantly unsettling without being accompanied by shrieking violins.

What propels each of the main characters, the young girl (whose name we never discover), her father Paul, and his mentor, Rossi, is the discovery of a mysterious old book among their own, a book with one printed page, that of a dragon with a banner reading “Drakulya” while the rest of the pages are blank. Throughout the novel we find that each character who has become obsessed with the legend of Vlad Tepes possesses a similar book that came to them under curious circumstances. Why and how these volumes keep turning up is one of the novel's mysteries an it's one of Kostova's rather clever conclusions in her own well-thought out realization of the character of Dracula. And there is throughout the book an enormous cast of characters, not merely just historical personages, but various researchers and students and librarians and bureaucrats and all of them are well-drawn, interesting, and fully fleshed.

We know, of course, from the very beginning, before the narrator even informs us, that when her father Paul speaks of a young beauty named Helen who he meets while trying to track down his missing mentor, that this will be the overtly absent mother of the young narrator. And, of course, since she is absent, we know there is a reason for that, and of course, as this is a horror novel, we know she is dead — or worse. Kostova manages to keep even that particularly familiar angle surprising. The author is at least a thorough-going plotter and she paces everything beautifully, setting up revelations with periodic sparks. All three story lines converge some hundred pages out from the novel’s end and from there the story picks up and aims squarely toward its conclusion.

The actual climax of the novel as our heroes close in on Dracula and his daytime resting place seems rather rushed, ending just all abruptly as if Kostova had opted just to skip overt dramatics, which feels a bit of a cheat, though she does make up for this lack of action with a final pages reversal that is as unsettling as it is quiet.
181 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Historian.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
May 15, 2006 – Finished Reading
May 19, 2008 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Brittany This was a great review of what has become one of my all time favorite books! It was such a great surprise for me and you've certainly done it justice here! Good work!

message 2: by Steve (last edited Aug 03, 2008 11:37AM) (new)

Steve This is the second time I've bumped up against one of your reviews in the last few days. And this is just like the other one (for Black Hole), outstanding! Thanks for the care and effort you put into these.

message 3: by Danielle (last edited Feb 26, 2009 11:19AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Danielle I picked this one up a while ago started it and never finished I just got busy. Your comment was a reminder to pick the Historian up at a later date . The beginning was intriguing and I love history pieces.

message 4: by Cody (new) - added it

Cody very good review it rings so true to the story i read it again just because of your review

message 5: by Elizabeth (last edited Jan 19, 2010 09:39AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Elizabeth What I appreciate so much about your review is that it gives concrete examples that support your opinions and impressions of the book, rational as well as emotional responses to what you read. Finding thoughtful arguments for and against a storytelling voice, like the ones you pose here, is so much more helpful to me than a simple "Loved it!" could be when I don't know much about the person making the review. It helps me to make an informed choice about purchasing a book, borrowing it or passing it by...so thank you. I'll definitely be checking your reading list for other endorsements — and cautionary tales!

message 6: by Amy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Amy R Had to laugh at the "light" comment. I really liked it, too, but have to admit it was a little bit long though I don't know what could have come out.

Liza You've made up my mind. I want to read it now-- though I'll likely need a few more filler books before I dive into a historical fantasy like this. I read "Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell" just a couple months ago; it is similarly thick and doused in history, something I didn't think I would like until I fell in love with it. You make it sound as though Kostova has a similar talent for using the historical references to solidify the plot instead of bogging it down.

As soon as my state of mind is prepared for another long-haul, I'm in.

Jean Marie Now this is how to review this book. It's my favorite book ever, but I struggled with the words to use to describe my love for this novel. But you said it all brillantly, especially the ending.

Rachel I also really liked this book and can't stop recommending it to people, but apparently I'm in the minority! Thanks for posting the review.

Pauline I also have this book and read it a couple of years ago. It was very long but I kept reading and found it interesting. Would probably have to read it again to refresh my memory but your review does bring some of it back. Nice one

Jaymi Couch Great review!

message 12: by Donna (new) - added it

Donna Great review. I was loaned this book for awhile now and because of this review this will be my next read.

message 13: by artemisa27 (new) - added it

artemisa27 then, If I liked Dracula in the past, would you recomend me read this book??

message 14: by J (new) - rated it 4 stars

J artemisa27, yes I would

message 15: by artemisa27 (new) - added it

artemisa27 okey, thank you, then I'll read it

back to top