Matthew Giffin's Reviews > Scientific Creationism
Scientific Creationism
by
by
This is just a quick summary of what I think about this book:
1. 60% trustworthy as far as science goes, but that’s only because of this book’s age. The astronomy section was especially obvious. Useful as a reference in some cases.
2. It refutes an argument that New Atheists and Neo Darwinians don’t even make, disproving a model they don’t even propose. Some areas were helpful, however, like the sections regarding the origin of life.
Overall, this work is indeed helpful, a classic in young-Earth creationism apologetics, but it’s obviously obsolete in terms of scientific data in many places. This book would not be my first choice for an apologetic reference, but it is definitely helpful and insightful as far as what the creationist movement used to be like.
1. 60% trustworthy as far as science goes, but that’s only because of this book’s age. The astronomy section was especially obvious. Useful as a reference in some cases.
2. It refutes an argument that New Atheists and Neo Darwinians don’t even make, disproving a model they don’t even propose. Some areas were helpful, however, like the sections regarding the origin of life.
Overall, this work is indeed helpful, a classic in young-Earth creationism apologetics, but it’s obviously obsolete in terms of scientific data in many places. This book would not be my first choice for an apologetic reference, but it is definitely helpful and insightful as far as what the creationist movement used to be like.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Scientific Creationism.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
October 19, 2017
–
Started Reading
October 19, 2017
– Shelved
October 29, 2017
–
Finished Reading
