Michelle's Reviews > The Brothers Karamazov
The Brothers Karamazov
by
by
“The Brothers Karamazov” has intrigued me for years. I have always been aware of the fact that it is one of the greatest novels ever written so I know I have to read it eventually. Finally, after reading it, I think I get why this is considered great literature-- and though I can't exactly say that I loved it, I admit that I don’t regret reading it.
The plot revolves around the murder of perhaps one of the most despicable characters ever created, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, the father of the Karamazov brothers. This detail about the book only skims the surface because this only serves as the basic architecture for Dostoevsky's philosophy. This novel isn't so much a story as: a lengthy dissertation on human nature; the issues of Dostoyevsky's day; detailed personality profiles; and digressions on every subject the author wanted to pursue, including free will, the existence of God, moral responsibility, and truth.
It's a high-minded novel full of weighty intellectual themes and Dostoevsky’s skill is unquestionable. “The Grand Inquisitor” is a supremely strange chapter , and one of the most unique things I’ve read in literature. The courtroom drama at the end of the novel, would be very hard to match in modern fiction. (view spoiler)
And of the family—what a family! Each figure in this household (?) embodies conflicting phases of the author’s great ideas: Fyodor Karamazov, the father, is a sensualist of the lowest type imaginable; Dmitri inherits his father’s passions but is tempered by periods of misgiving; Ivan is a materialist and a cynic. He changes his mind after a severe illness, and his materialistic belief is replaced by intense spiritual curiosity; Alyosha is an idealist, lovable and loving. Dostoevsky’s discordant elements are effectively conveyed in his human characterizations.
That said, “The Brothers Karamazov” still didn’t impress me as much as I expected it to. The story started out painfully slow. In my opinion, a great novel shouldn't require readers to force themselves to stay awake for more than 1/4 of the book in order to become acquainted with initially uninteresting characters. As with the rest of the book, there were many points where Dostoevsky seemed to descend into meaningless details that, to me, did nothing to advance the plot, atmosphere, or characterization.
I feel that the author is disconnected from his audience, and he doesn't seem to care. This comes to a point where I think Dostoevsky frequently loses himself in the meshes of his own word spinning. The book goes off too many tangents and is densely verbose.
I found pages of extraordinary depth and poignancy but they are few and far in between. I find it hard to connect with any of the characters since their personalities are diluted by the manic and morbidly intense verbal flow. Half the book was one of the Karamazovs talking on and on, uninterrupted to an audience as silent and passive as the reader. I frequently spaced out and have to backtrack. I eventually found myself reading this book in a grim desire to finish it and be done, rather than out of a sense of enjoyment.
I admired author's insights into human nature, but all too often, he seemed to make grand proclamations arbitrarily that have little evidence behind them. As if by declaring them with confidence he somehow made them true beyond question. And for whatever unaccountable reason, his preoccupations landed like a relic in my own life. My feelings can be aptly described by Rosewater’s words in Kurt Vonnegut’s “Slaughterhouse Five”:
“There is one other book, that can teach you everything you need to know about life... it's The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, but that's not enough anymore.”
I still think it’s worth the read, and there is always something to be earned from reading the books of great authors who influenced other great authors. And besides, no matter what my opinion is, Ol’ Dusty is still going strong!
The plot revolves around the murder of perhaps one of the most despicable characters ever created, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, the father of the Karamazov brothers. This detail about the book only skims the surface because this only serves as the basic architecture for Dostoevsky's philosophy. This novel isn't so much a story as: a lengthy dissertation on human nature; the issues of Dostoyevsky's day; detailed personality profiles; and digressions on every subject the author wanted to pursue, including free will, the existence of God, moral responsibility, and truth.
It's a high-minded novel full of weighty intellectual themes and Dostoevsky’s skill is unquestionable. “The Grand Inquisitor” is a supremely strange chapter , and one of the most unique things I’ve read in literature. The courtroom drama at the end of the novel, would be very hard to match in modern fiction. (view spoiler)
And of the family—what a family! Each figure in this household (?) embodies conflicting phases of the author’s great ideas: Fyodor Karamazov, the father, is a sensualist of the lowest type imaginable; Dmitri inherits his father’s passions but is tempered by periods of misgiving; Ivan is a materialist and a cynic. He changes his mind after a severe illness, and his materialistic belief is replaced by intense spiritual curiosity; Alyosha is an idealist, lovable and loving. Dostoevsky’s discordant elements are effectively conveyed in his human characterizations.
That said, “The Brothers Karamazov” still didn’t impress me as much as I expected it to. The story started out painfully slow. In my opinion, a great novel shouldn't require readers to force themselves to stay awake for more than 1/4 of the book in order to become acquainted with initially uninteresting characters. As with the rest of the book, there were many points where Dostoevsky seemed to descend into meaningless details that, to me, did nothing to advance the plot, atmosphere, or characterization.
I feel that the author is disconnected from his audience, and he doesn't seem to care. This comes to a point where I think Dostoevsky frequently loses himself in the meshes of his own word spinning. The book goes off too many tangents and is densely verbose.
I found pages of extraordinary depth and poignancy but they are few and far in between. I find it hard to connect with any of the characters since their personalities are diluted by the manic and morbidly intense verbal flow. Half the book was one of the Karamazovs talking on and on, uninterrupted to an audience as silent and passive as the reader. I frequently spaced out and have to backtrack. I eventually found myself reading this book in a grim desire to finish it and be done, rather than out of a sense of enjoyment.
I admired author's insights into human nature, but all too often, he seemed to make grand proclamations arbitrarily that have little evidence behind them. As if by declaring them with confidence he somehow made them true beyond question. And for whatever unaccountable reason, his preoccupations landed like a relic in my own life. My feelings can be aptly described by Rosewater’s words in Kurt Vonnegut’s “Slaughterhouse Five”:
“There is one other book, that can teach you everything you need to know about life... it's The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, but that's not enough anymore.”
I still think it’s worth the read, and there is always something to be earned from reading the books of great authors who influenced other great authors. And besides, no matter what my opinion is, Ol’ Dusty is still going strong!
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Brothers Karamazov.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
David Bisset
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
May 25, 2017 12:15PM
Have just finished it: worth the effort. but it a strange book!
reply
|
flag
*
David Bisset wrote: "Have just finished it: worth the effort. but it a strange book!"It needed a lot of patience. Half the time I wanted to give up on it.
Jaime Wolter wrote: "Great review. Thank you. I'm also glad I read it, but won't be reading it again!"Thank you, Jaime! I hope you are enjoying your current read!
I’m pushing my way through but found Crime and Punishment more enjoyable. I’ve also read War and Peace and Les Miserables and the same holds true. This ranks below them all.
Sarah wrote: "I’m pushing my way through but found Crime and Punishment more enjoyable. I’ve also read War and Peace and Les Miserables and the same holds true. This ranks below them all."A lot of people recommended "Crime and Punishment", saying I might like it better. Hopefully, I'll have enough motivation to read it next year. Cheers!
Thank you Michelle. I’m currently reading this book, on page 250. Your comments align with my perception so far. It’s always discouraging to not connect with a masterpiece the way other people do. I find myself slogging along but I will stick with it. I read War and Peace last year and loved it. I was expecting the same joy from this book. I read The Count of Monte Cristo last year also and enjoyed it immensely. I’ll hang with this because of your review and also the comments of Parker and others. I am not alone! Thanks again.
Rita wrote: "Thank you Michelle. I’m currently reading this book, on page 250. Your comments align with my perception so far. It’s always discouraging to not connect with a masterpiece the way other people do. ..."Thank you, Rita! The book does get a little better by the last quarter, so hang in there!
Beverly wrote: "You are a greater soul than I. I dnf after about half way through Michelle"I just like to torture myself with tedious books from time to time. I hope you are enjoying your current read, Beverly!
Michelle wrote: "Beverly wrote: "You are a greater soul than I. I dnf after about half way through Michelle"I just like to torture myself with tedious books from time to time. I hope you are enjoying your current..."
I am! Thanks Michelle. I usually do finish, but I just couldn't with the Brothers K.
While I rated the book a 5☆ I can see why you felt differently.. good points from your point of view and feelings!! I'm trying to get in mode to read Crime and Punishment... maybe my first book for the new year...?!
Karina wrote: "While I rated the book a 5☆ I can see why you felt differently.. good points from your point of view and feelings!! I'm trying to get in mode to read Crime and Punishment... maybe my first book for..."I guess it's just not my cup of tea 🙂I've had "Crime and Punishment" in my to-read pile for about 2 years now, but I'm not really sure when I'm up for it. I hope you enjoy it, and I look forward to your review!
dostoyevski was so ill when he was writing this book. he finished book quickly and died after finishing two months.i believe in that his final section was so different in his mind.
afterall whatever the conditions, karamavoz brothers is the best book i have ever read.
as everybody know tolstoy escaped from home before his death in 1910 and he took only karamazov brothers book. he said about dostoyevski "he had pen of god"
Gökhan wrote: "dostoyevski was so ill when he was writing this book. he finished book quickly and died after finishing two months.i believe in that his final section was so different in his mind.
afterall wh..."
You could use your comment as your review, Gökhan. Well said!
I have read this book and crime and punishment. Crime and punishment was for me far more compelling, and one of the best books I’ve read. But your review of this book was bang on for me and totally aligns with what I thought.
Jack wrote: "I have read this book and crime and punishment. Crime and punishment was for me far more compelling, and one of the best books I’ve read. But your review of this book was bang on for me and totally..."I hope to read Crime and Punishment this year. I hope you are enjoying your current read, Jack!
You better articulated my sentiments than I could have regarding pacing, having trouble getting into the book, confusion as to where I was at in the story (backtracking), and finishing to be done, rather than because I was enjoying it. I thoroughly enjoyed and followed him through Crime and Punishment, but this was a slog.
To understand dostevsky you've got to be in another level altogether.its not an easy read.its for those readers who thrive on putting the capabilities of their mind to the limit and beyond.
Anilthapa wrote: "To understand dostevsky you've got to be in another level altogether.its not an easy read.its for those readers who thrive on putting the capabilities of their mind to the limit and beyond."Understanding something doesn't necessarily mean you have to like it.
Most Russian writers start slow, especially Dostoievski, but it is definitely worth it. I think it depends on the translation as well, but there are some magnificent metaphors in the book.
Soco wrote: "Most Russian writers start slow, especially Dostoievski, but it is definitely worth it. I think it depends on the translation as well, but there are some magnificent metaphors in the book."I did say it was worth the read.
This review describes exactly how I feel after finishing the book today! There were some great insights and ideas but covered up by pages of non-engaging content. Especially in the beginning it seemed so slow-progressing and kind of dated, or perhaps that last one is just my opinion.
most russian novels drag. they're writing to a russian audience, who lived for details with different values than the values of today. besides, this was their weekly netflix feed! it was published serially, so they would debate passionately about each chapter as they mused what would happen in the next one. they would scrutinize every single detail. i mean, few people read like that in this day and age.
also, most russian people liked the preaching. a majority of them believed in most of it, and books like this would only unite the russian people more.
think of it from another perspective. however, i do agree with you: it's just not one of those books you regret reading. ever.


