Bill Kerwin's Reviews > On the Incarnation
On the Incarnation
by Athanasius of Alexandria
I was pleased to find On the Incarnation remarkably fresh and engaging, still fierce and still passionate too. Such is rarely the case with works of theology, particularly when orthodoxy has robbed them even of the novelty of heresy, for dry-as-dust disquisitions on settled questions often summon our slumber, not our thoughts. But this work is an exception, for the intellect, honesty, and force of personality of St. Athanasius of Alexandria still blaze like a beacon after more than seventeen hundred years.
Athanasius was the champion of orthodoxy when orthodoxy was losing, imperiled by the rapid growth of the Arian heresy. This heterodox idea, that the Son is somehow a lesser being than the Father, not only spread through the East and converted the barbarians of the West, but also—even more dangerously—appealed to the educated and powerful people of the age. In the course of his life of eighty years, Athanasius, a fierce trinitarian, opposed four emperors and many prominent churchmen, and—as the result of his theological squabbles--was exiled from his bishopric of Alexandria a total of five times. Thus he earned the name—which will also be the title of his biopic (if I ever get the chance to film it)—Athanasius Contra Mundum (Athanasius Against the World).
Arianism receives no mention in On the Incarnation, but the passionate Trinitarianism that kept Athanasius fighting all his life is everywhere in evidence. His principal concern is to show that the Godhead, in all of its fullness and dynamism, is present in every particle of creation, and—most important of all—in the person of Jesus Christ Who is The Word. He begins his account with the creation, making it clear that the Word which redeems us is also the Word which creates us, and that this same Word prepares our redemption by entering thoroughly into every fiber, every recess of our humanity, so that our corrupted flesh may be thoroughly saved from death and that death itself may die. When Athanasius speaks of atonement, though he mentions Christ as ransom, his Christ is even closer to the Christus Victor—the champion who tricks Satan by His unmerited death and thus wins from His confounded adversary the freedom of our souls—a fitting Christ for a wily old warrior like himself.
I have to admit I found the final three chapters (proof texts and apologetics directed to the Jews and the Greeks) rather less than inspiring, but the first five—about fifty pages—are compelling enough to read in one sitting. This is, after all, a great story, the story of God Incarnate and His fight for our salvation. And Athanasius, the accomplished fighter, tells the story well.
I'll let Athanasius have the last word:
As when a great king has entered some great city and dwelt in one of the houses in it, such a city is then greatly honoured, and no longer does any enemy or bandit come against it, but it is rather treated with regard because of the king who has taken up residence in one of its houses; so also is the case with the King of all. For since he has come to our realm and has dwelt in a body similar to ours, now every machination of the enemy against men has ceased and the corruption of death, which formerly had power over them, has been destroyed.
by Athanasius of Alexandria
Bill Kerwin's review
bookshelves: religion, spirituality
Jan 18, 2016
bookshelves: religion, spirituality
Read from January 18 to 24, 2016
,
read count: 1
I was pleased to find On the Incarnation remarkably fresh and engaging, still fierce and still passionate too. Such is rarely the case with works of theology, particularly when orthodoxy has robbed them even of the novelty of heresy, for dry-as-dust disquisitions on settled questions often summon our slumber, not our thoughts. But this work is an exception, for the intellect, honesty, and force of personality of St. Athanasius of Alexandria still blaze like a beacon after more than seventeen hundred years.
Athanasius was the champion of orthodoxy when orthodoxy was losing, imperiled by the rapid growth of the Arian heresy. This heterodox idea, that the Son is somehow a lesser being than the Father, not only spread through the East and converted the barbarians of the West, but also—even more dangerously—appealed to the educated and powerful people of the age. In the course of his life of eighty years, Athanasius, a fierce trinitarian, opposed four emperors and many prominent churchmen, and—as the result of his theological squabbles--was exiled from his bishopric of Alexandria a total of five times. Thus he earned the name—which will also be the title of his biopic (if I ever get the chance to film it)—Athanasius Contra Mundum (Athanasius Against the World).
Arianism receives no mention in On the Incarnation, but the passionate Trinitarianism that kept Athanasius fighting all his life is everywhere in evidence. His principal concern is to show that the Godhead, in all of its fullness and dynamism, is present in every particle of creation, and—most important of all—in the person of Jesus Christ Who is The Word. He begins his account with the creation, making it clear that the Word which redeems us is also the Word which creates us, and that this same Word prepares our redemption by entering thoroughly into every fiber, every recess of our humanity, so that our corrupted flesh may be thoroughly saved from death and that death itself may die. When Athanasius speaks of atonement, though he mentions Christ as ransom, his Christ is even closer to the Christus Victor—the champion who tricks Satan by His unmerited death and thus wins from His confounded adversary the freedom of our souls—a fitting Christ for a wily old warrior like himself.
I have to admit I found the final three chapters (proof texts and apologetics directed to the Jews and the Greeks) rather less than inspiring, but the first five—about fifty pages—are compelling enough to read in one sitting. This is, after all, a great story, the story of God Incarnate and His fight for our salvation. And Athanasius, the accomplished fighter, tells the story well.
I'll let Athanasius have the last word:
As when a great king has entered some great city and dwelt in one of the houses in it, such a city is then greatly honoured, and no longer does any enemy or bandit come against it, but it is rather treated with regard because of the king who has taken up residence in one of its houses; so also is the case with the King of all. For since he has come to our realm and has dwelt in a body similar to ours, now every machination of the enemy against men has ceased and the corruption of death, which formerly had power over them, has been destroyed.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
On the Incarnation.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
| 01/18/2016 | marked as: | to-read | ||
| 01/18/2016 | marked as: | currently-reading | ||
| 01/24/2016 | marked as: | read | ||
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Choko
(new)
Jan 26, 2016 12:29PM
Great review!
reply
|
flag
*
Good review, Bill. I normally prefer stories about the victims of orthodoxy's ascendancy (in the middle of an Elaine Pagels book now
Steve wrote: "Good review, Bill. I normally prefer stories about the victims of orthodoxy's ascendancy (in the middle of an Elaine Pagels book now "Me too. And I like Pagels. And underdogs. But Athanasius was definitely a 4th century underdog!
Dog for sure. Under? Possibly…but the Trinity is such a 3rdC concept, and Arius so sensible…One New England protestant minister applicant was stoned leaving the pulpit of congregants angry at his idea of the Trinity (T Baird, "A Dry and Thirsty Land"); and of course one Inquisition charge against G Bruno's saying "Arius was misundertood."
Alan wrote: "Dog for sure. Under? Possibly…but the Trinity is such a 3rdC concept, and Arius so sensible…One New England protestant minister applicant was stoned leaving the pulpit of congregants angry at his i..."I've always seen Trinity not as "a 3rdC concept", but as timeless. It is a paradigm for both creative intellect and process, inherently dynamic and renewed periodically--both as heresy and as orthodoxy--in Augustine, Joachim of Flora, Hegel, Marx, Chardin and Boff, etc.
Arius probably was misunderstood. It is impossible to know for certain, since the established church made sure to destroy everything he wrote!
Bill wrote: "I've always seen Trinity not as "a 3rdC concept", but as timeless."Indeed, that's rather the point, isn't it?
Read this years ago, as well as the works of St. Augustine. There's a fascinating contrast that has stayed with us. In Athanasius, the goodness of creation, including the human vessel, is re-affirmed by God taking on flesh in the Son.By contrast, Augustine came from the Manichean tradition where flesh, the physical, was considered evil. When he moved on to Neoplatonism. the attitude was the same, the spiritual was always superior. Thus the physical was suspect. The body was to be flagellated to curb fleshly desires, and celibacy was considered superior because one did not have to mess with procreation, i.e. sex.
I don't recall Pagels discussing this, but the Gnostics were similar in that they saw the human body as evil and constrictive in that it imprisoned the "divine spark." A leading Gnostic. Marcion, taught that Jesus did not appear in human form, but as some kind of spiritual vision.
