Eva's Reviews > The Symposium

The Symposium by Plato
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
44623637
's review
Nov 26, 2015

really liked it
Read from November 26 to 28, 2015

Two points about this book that I didn't enjoy. Firstly the descriptions of intimate relations with persons of a very very young age which although not exclusive to the Greek people in those times were nevertheless disturbing to read about. Secondly, in the last pages he seems to be tooting his own horn a lot. Even though he portrays Socrates as this superhuman human we know that Socrates speaks Platos own words throughout the whole text so he seems to be giving these amazing characteristics to himself. Whether he does it consciously or not I don't know. Other than that the whole discussion about the god Eros is very interesting and I enjoyed certain passages a lot. His comparison of love for birth which is physical and love for birth in being creative such that an artist might have is brilliant. As well as the mortality and immortality of love. Here love is something between love and passion as meant by the Greek word Eros.
It is a truly philosophical text that helps us understand our hearts and our human instincts better.
16 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Symposium.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

11/26/2015 marked as: currently-reading
11/28/2015 marked as: read
show 2 hidden updates…

Comments (showing 1-3 of 3) (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Travelin (new)

Travelin Is it possible that you read it in ancient Greek? I wonder if he would admit that artists don't demand physical love to create works of passion.


message 2: by Eva (new) - rated it 4 stars

Eva I read it in translated Greek from Ancient Greek. I think that with his comparison on physical love and creative love born of the soul he actually puts the second on a pedestal and thinks it much higher in terms of rendering a man immortal rather than giving birth to another human being. So to answer your question I think that he would say that it is necessary in order to satisfy a basic human instinct but the artist would feel very incomplete without the ability to give birth to ideas. That's always his aim and ideal.


message 3: by Eva (new) - rated it 4 stars

Eva Haha well as a musician you would.. I do have a soft spot for Plato though. I know he's been judged a lot but one has to admit that in certain respects he was ahead of his time. It's not so evident here but it is in the Republic.


back to top