emma's Reviews > Jane Eyre
Jane Eyre
by
by
emma's review
bookshelves: owned, favorites-2016, classics, recommend, beautifully-written, slump-worthy, non-ya, school, reviewed, gorgeous-covers, 5-stars, reread, dark, favorites, comments
Apr 30, 2015
bookshelves: owned, favorites-2016, classics, recommend, beautifully-written, slump-worthy, non-ya, school, reviewed, gorgeous-covers, 5-stars, reread, dark, favorites, comments
Read 2 times. Last read September 12, 2018.
I am a very pretentious person.
I try to seem “hip” and “cool” and “relatable” and “down with the teens” - and of course I totally am all of those things - but also I have my tendencies toward pretension. It’s who I am. Just last night I shuddered at the idea of popular music, like some kind of eight-hundred-year-old gremlin.
I am not proud of this side of me, but it’s who I am. And also it is important background information for you, dear Reader, going into this review. (That direct address to you as an audience member was me emulating this book, not an example of my pretension. Or was it???)
Anyway. It’s important that you know my capacity to be pretentious so that I can make this statement:
I don’t get how any reader can say they don’t like classics.
Oof. A doozy, right? Aren’t you glad I warned you? Now you know that that wasn’t just a one-off of self-serious condescension but rather a pattern of my personality and oh sh*t actually my explanation probably made the whole thing a million times worse. Now I’ve painted my insufferability as consistent.
Come back, everyone!!!! Let me explain!
What I need to explain is that this book is excellent, and also a classic. It is very very old but sometimes old stuff is still worth it! (I should know. I have the mannerisms of the type of grumpy old man that gets endearingly profiled in Scandinavian bestsellers.)
This is not the classic I would recommend that someone start with if they’re looking to get into the genre. It is very, very slow, and very wordy, and the language takes some settling in. But also this book is a literal gem.
It was published in 19th century England, which is no one’s idea of Progressive Central. But this book is jarringly feminist when the constraints it (and Jane) were working in are taken into account. Jane is an independent woman, and this book from eighteen freakin’ forty-seven tells her story.
Now, I love Jane Austen books as much as the next girl (if the next girl is pretty damn obsessed with Jane Austen), but that’s something not even all her books can say.
Here’s the thing about this book: I love nineteenth century fiction (or what I’ve read of it), but even if you didn’t you’d probably love this book. So much of this is unique, by the standards of then but also even the standards of today. It’s a romance, yes, which: extremely normal. But it’s a romance between two characters who are not conventionally beautiful, which is unbelievably rare.
It’s also not a romance that acts as basically the sole option for its female character. I love Pride & Prejudice, and I of course think Lizzie Bennet is a feminist (and awesome) character, but there’s no way for that book to end, really, that doesn’t include marriage for her. Three of the five Bennet sisters get married over the course of that book. It’s either that or old maid status, baby.
But not lil Jane Eyre. She does not allow marriage to be the only prospect for her!! She goes away and makes a life for herself and then decides whether she wants to follow that path. We don’t even see that in every 21st century romance.
Plus, Jane is an excellent character, and of a type we RARELY see. She’s serious and upstanding and smart and moral. She has a strong mind and she doesn’t shy away from that. She lacks the requisite features of today’s female subjects of romance: the quirkiness or the humor or the adorkable way she trips and falls/spills coffee/etc. She also lacks the nineteenth-century version of a lot of those traits. And it is so goddamn refreshing I can’t even tell you.
And on top of all that, the language in this book is so gorgeous I want the whole manuscript tattooed on me.
Which would be wild, because this is about a million pages long. And speaking of, yes, it is very slow and hard to get into and basically you have to adjust to a whole new reading experience. So I wouldn’t recommend starting off your nineteenth century fiction binge with this book.
But I would recommend getting into nineteenth century fiction solely for the purpose of reading this book.
Bottom line: IT’S JUST SO DAMN GOOD, YOU GUYS.
-------------
pre-review
hey um...i love this book so stupid much???
if you've got a free few hours over the course of the next few months i HIGHLY recommend rereading this book at a snail's pace. worked out for me very well.
i should probably shout about my adoration of this book for several pages so. full review 2 come
I try to seem “hip” and “cool” and “relatable” and “down with the teens” - and of course I totally am all of those things - but also I have my tendencies toward pretension. It’s who I am. Just last night I shuddered at the idea of popular music, like some kind of eight-hundred-year-old gremlin.
I am not proud of this side of me, but it’s who I am. And also it is important background information for you, dear Reader, going into this review. (That direct address to you as an audience member was me emulating this book, not an example of my pretension. Or was it???)
Anyway. It’s important that you know my capacity to be pretentious so that I can make this statement:
I don’t get how any reader can say they don’t like classics.
Oof. A doozy, right? Aren’t you glad I warned you? Now you know that that wasn’t just a one-off of self-serious condescension but rather a pattern of my personality and oh sh*t actually my explanation probably made the whole thing a million times worse. Now I’ve painted my insufferability as consistent.
Come back, everyone!!!! Let me explain!
What I need to explain is that this book is excellent, and also a classic. It is very very old but sometimes old stuff is still worth it! (I should know. I have the mannerisms of the type of grumpy old man that gets endearingly profiled in Scandinavian bestsellers.)
This is not the classic I would recommend that someone start with if they’re looking to get into the genre. It is very, very slow, and very wordy, and the language takes some settling in. But also this book is a literal gem.
It was published in 19th century England, which is no one’s idea of Progressive Central. But this book is jarringly feminist when the constraints it (and Jane) were working in are taken into account. Jane is an independent woman, and this book from eighteen freakin’ forty-seven tells her story.
Now, I love Jane Austen books as much as the next girl (if the next girl is pretty damn obsessed with Jane Austen), but that’s something not even all her books can say.
Here’s the thing about this book: I love nineteenth century fiction (or what I’ve read of it), but even if you didn’t you’d probably love this book. So much of this is unique, by the standards of then but also even the standards of today. It’s a romance, yes, which: extremely normal. But it’s a romance between two characters who are not conventionally beautiful, which is unbelievably rare.
It’s also not a romance that acts as basically the sole option for its female character. I love Pride & Prejudice, and I of course think Lizzie Bennet is a feminist (and awesome) character, but there’s no way for that book to end, really, that doesn’t include marriage for her. Three of the five Bennet sisters get married over the course of that book. It’s either that or old maid status, baby.
But not lil Jane Eyre. She does not allow marriage to be the only prospect for her!! She goes away and makes a life for herself and then decides whether she wants to follow that path. We don’t even see that in every 21st century romance.
Plus, Jane is an excellent character, and of a type we RARELY see. She’s serious and upstanding and smart and moral. She has a strong mind and she doesn’t shy away from that. She lacks the requisite features of today’s female subjects of romance: the quirkiness or the humor or the adorkable way she trips and falls/spills coffee/etc. She also lacks the nineteenth-century version of a lot of those traits. And it is so goddamn refreshing I can’t even tell you.
And on top of all that, the language in this book is so gorgeous I want the whole manuscript tattooed on me.
Which would be wild, because this is about a million pages long. And speaking of, yes, it is very slow and hard to get into and basically you have to adjust to a whole new reading experience. So I wouldn’t recommend starting off your nineteenth century fiction binge with this book.
But I would recommend getting into nineteenth century fiction solely for the purpose of reading this book.
Bottom line: IT’S JUST SO DAMN GOOD, YOU GUYS.
-------------
pre-review
hey um...i love this book so stupid much???
if you've got a free few hours over the course of the next few months i HIGHLY recommend rereading this book at a snail's pace. worked out for me very well.
i should probably shout about my adoration of this book for several pages so. full review 2 come
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Jane Eyre.
Sign In »
Quotes emma Liked
Reading Progress
April 30, 2015
– Shelved
February 12, 2016
–
Started Reading
February 14, 2016
–
56.39%
"oh how i wish i didn't know the ending. as is, there's no better book to read on valentine's day!"
page
322
February 15, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Started Reading
September 12, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jill
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 15, 2016 01:01PM
Jane Eyre is my all time favorite classic so Im glad you loved it as well! :D
reply
|
flag
*
Joanna (BookandPages) wrote: "I can't get into this book!"it's definitely slow going. i reread it over the course of a couple months which was honestly pretty ideal
It contains a lot of extense and incredibly well-depicted descriptions that, even to the most avid reader of the 21st century, it provokes a little shock due to the difference in today´s writing style.
W. wrote: "It contains a lot of extense and incredibly well-depicted descriptions that, even to the most avid reader of the 21st century, it provokes a little shock due to the difference in today´s writing st..."well put
pris wrote: "I just bought this for $5 because it was it the clearance section as it is 'old'. Shame."bizarre but good deal at least!
s.penkevich wrote: "YES"books shouldn't be allowed to be as good as this one is. it's not fair to the others
emma wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "YES"books shouldn't be allowed to be as good as this one is. it's not fair to the others"
emma wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "YES"
books shouldn't be allowed to be as good as this one is. it's not fair to the others"
Really true. As years pass, I think back on this book more and more. It's eternal for sure, I may need to revisit it again.
s.penkevich wrote: "emma wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "YES"books shouldn't be allowed to be as good as this one is. it's not fair to the others"
emma wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "YES"
books shouldn't be allowed to be..."
i reread it very slowly in bits and pieces over a few months and it was really an excellent experience. 10/10 would recommend
Jane eyre is and always will be phenomenal. The first time I read it, it actually only took me a couple days as I thought the plot and characters were so compelling and rich. The fabulous thing about Jane is that she is a modern woman! She is strong and intelligent and knows what she wants and I absolutely adore her for that. She is just so real and it’s easy to empathize with her. This will always be an all time favorite. Also I agree- how is it possible to not like the classics? They’re classics for a reason!!!!
Morgan wrote: "What would you recommend for someone first venturing into nineteenth century fiction?"Pride & Prejudice can be a good place to start, but still rocky - i think nineteenth-century children's books, like Alice's Adventures in Wonderland or Little Women, can be a great stepping stone. and also they are soso fun so it's a win win
Edith 🧜🏽♀️ wrote: "Jane eyre is and always will be phenomenal. The first time I read it, it actually only took me a couple days as I thought the plot and characters were so compelling and rich. The fabulous thing abo..."lovelovelove this! the first time i read this i read it mostly in one day b/c it was just that good. which is why it was extra nice to take my sweet sweet time this time around
Jane Eyre actually was the first full English book that I've rest at about the age 14 / 15 yo (obviously English is 2nd/3rd language) ... So ..
Asma wrote: "Jane Eyre actually was the first full English book that I've rest at about the age 14 / 15 yo (obviously English is 2nd/3rd language) ... So .."that's very cool for you
This isn't only my favourite classic but it's one of my all time favourite books. It's so much more than a romance story. Jane is so intelligent & fights for her independence, honestly such an iconic character. I need to re-read this soon!
sidsel89 wrote: "Which 19th century literature would you recommend? (Read all Austen of course)"Dracula is great. Sherlock Holmes is great. Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman are wonderful poets if you're into that. lotta great fairytale-y stuff happening with Hans Christian Andersen and the Brothers Grimm. and then obviously i lovelovelove alice's adventures in wonderland
Evie wrote: "This isn't only my favourite classic but it's one of my all time favourite books. It's so much more than a romance story. Jane is so intelligent & fights for her independence, honestly such an icon..."AGREEAGREEAGREE. totally reread it i'm so happy i did







