Note: some of our members have reported that not all read dates are showing on this page. While we work on making sure they correctly display on this page, you can still view your dates on your review or on the book page.
This collection of four lectures is a quick read and although it provides some insights into the personal nature/quirks of these writers it is not thaThis collection of four lectures is a quick read and although it provides some insights into the personal nature/quirks of these writers it is not that informative. The book is not even a short biography of these four and the tone of the text tends to be gossipy but gossip that is presumably backed up by little known sources familiar to the author.
The author attempts some discussion on the interrelationship of among these writers but he falls far short and the result is that they seem to not share all that much in common which may be more the case than not. The lecture on Wilde is probably the least absorbing and the one on Yeats the most engaging as the author is a biographer of the latter.
The reader should be ready to follow up on leads to people and places referenced in the lectures because they can provide some depth into the lives of the individual writers....more
I was attracted to Laing’s book because it has been said to be a source of Doris Lessing’s novel, A Briefing for a Decent into Hell, which she denied.I was attracted to Laing’s book because it has been said to be a source of Doris Lessing’s novel, A Briefing for a Decent into Hell, which she denied. Laing’s text is a compilation of reworked articles he published between 1962 and 1965 and center on human perception and its relationship to schizophrenia of society as a whole.
Existential relationships are characterized in terms of experience and behavior within the framework a feedback loop but Laing’s method of presentation seems to be too repetitive and has a tone that smacks of the mystic dialogue of the 70's revolutionary youth movement and Lao Tzu's mindfulness mumbo jumbo. It can leave you feeling that you understand a concept simply because you're only carried along by the cadence of the prose.
There is an element of validity to Laing's thesis that society is insane but it's presented at a superficial level and is cloaked in the radical coffee house banter of the Vietnam era that, at times, has the academic preachiness of a screed. Nonetheless, the text can be more useful in understanding the cultural mindset of that period than it can in helping understand and treat schizophrenia.
The first half of Chapter 4, Us & Them, is understandable in the framework of control theory with feedback loops but the second half veers off into New Left rhetoric with reference to Sartre's Marxist dialectic which can unintelligible in today’s culture. Laing’s articles have their origins within the transition between the Beat and the Hip culture and the influences of Taoism and Herbert Marcuse are clearly visible. Laing's ideas easily dovetail with the early prophets of the drug culture such as Leary and Castaneda.
The Schizophrenic Experience in Chapter 5 is presented from a clinical perspective rather than in New Left/New Age rhetoric of earlier chapters; hence more credible. According to Laing, schizophrenia has its origins in the separation between our inner self bereft of substance, our outer self bereft of meaning (i.e. alienation) and confusing the realities of one with the other. The concepts of We, Them, Us, and the Other presented in earlier chapters helps support Laing’s thesis that it's not really evident whose sane and who is not, viz. The Gadarene Swine Fallacy which seems to have originated by him.
Chapter 6 proceeds into transcendental experience (guided & purposeful) and its similarities to schizophrenia (unguided & terrifying). It is here that we see the outlines of Lessing's novel and his own subtle references to drug induced exploration of the 70s culture. Chapter 7 is a clinical transcription of a recovered schizophrenic patient and, although mundane, is helpful in understanding that a patient can occupy two worlds and can recollect the emotional impact of both.
The final chapter, The Bird of Paradise, is apparently Laing’s articulation of his own drug induced exploration of the schizophrenic state but it seems more like his foray into a new literary form than it being meant to support his thesis. His prose is neither mundane nor clinical but is related to us like a reading of a rambling Ginsberg poem using syntactically correct but meaningless sentences like Chomsky’s, “Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.” In retrospect Lessing clearly articulates her character’s vivid schizophrenic experiences as well as the mundane clinical experiences. The schizophrenic experiences of her patient are lucid and have the “logic” of a dream sequence whereas Laing’s presentation in his Bird of Paradise may sound profound but is meaningless....more