|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0140442103
| 9780140442106
| 0140442103
| 4.35
| 33,580
| 65
| Aug 26, 2004
|
it was amazing
|
0.1 Steel yourselves against misfortune
0.2 Study philosophy to build a better character, not a better intellect
0.3 Don't expect a change in surroundings to fix you
1 Not completely convinced
This is an abridged version of my full review. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 09, 2021
|
Mar 20, 2021
|
Mar 09, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0226876802
| 9780226876801
| B006IMMOVW
| 4.14
| 1,571
| 1948
| Sep 28, 1984
|
it was amazing
|
An amazing treatise. Weaver touches on several topics that I have been wondering about over the past few years, and he views each topic through a shre
An amazing treatise. Weaver touches on several topics that I have been wondering about over the past few years, and he views each topic through a shrewd lens of traditional values and intellectual corruption. The overarching theme is that modernism has pushed us away from first principles, abstract ideas, acceptance of the existence of a metaphysical world that is not our own and a "complete" education which would allow us to think about the general, rather than focus on the specifics. The victory of the modernists (the "nominalists") has been complete, to a degree that a thing when owned by us is "good", while the same thing owned by another is "bad". This book is well known as a kind of manifesto for the return to traditional values and is used by conservative politicians, but the book is *NOT* a political manifesto. It talks about liberal politicians and "rabid egalitarians", always accompanying these lines with the thinking and the justification behind these classifications. (Weaver argues that our current fear of classifying and grouping people, groups, and nations is another sign of modernism's victory in spreading the dogma of "equality") He summarizes the image of a modern man, from a press agency's point of view, when deciding how to advertise to him, in one amazing paragraph:
Weaver's plan for restoration includes a return to first principles, humility, an acceptance of the things that nature and the past can teach us. It includes the abolition of the sensationalist media, and any kind of media that is bound to produce "comedy-variety shows", that are aimed at keeping the vacuous minded ignorant and in good will. It includes the studying of the past, and a complete education that educates us in both rhetoric and dialectic, teaching us how to think and how to live with the abstract. This was an aspirational book written in 1948. 73 years later, most of what Weaver argued for didn't happen. That serves to make the picture clearer: The decision to not act was the current generation's. On a personal level, it can serve as a guidebook, as we continue to slip further into the wasteland dominated by the media, the popular media, and the broadening of the noise through platforms like Instagram. I read this book on archive.org: [[https://archive.org/details/richard-m...]] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 31, 2021
|
Feb 06, 2021
|
Jan 09, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
4.28
| 77,813
| May 07, 2019
| May 07, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
I posted a version of this review on my blog as well, where you can read it with better formatting: https://blog.siddharthkannan.in/2022/...
1 Capitalism
2 Time
3 Freewill
4 Conditioning
5 Memory
6 Truth
7 Parenting
8 Conclusion
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 16, 2021
|
Jun 21, 2021
|
Nov 28, 2020
|
Kindle Edition
| ||||||||||||||||||
4.02
| 236,110
| Jun 10, 1947
| Mar 1991
|
it was amazing
|
Great book, great story, a bunch of great characters. Rambert was the character that I related with hardest. Especially his craving to leave the islan
Great book, great story, a bunch of great characters. Rambert was the character that I related with hardest. Especially his craving to leave the island and return to Paris and his decision on the day that he was going to leave. This book's tag line should be Separation and Exile. The book ends on a positive note; but the ending comes about mysteriously. I am not sure if Camus did this simply because he didn't want to write a depressing book, or to symbolize the ending of pestilence and how inexplicable it always feels. Either way, reading this book helped me better understand the period until the end. It did not increase my confidence that the ongoing pestilence will end because of anything that can be consciously done. Thinking back to the beginning of the ongoing pandemic (Feb 2020):
The 8 week emergency in Japan, everyday, Tokyo's mayor would come out and request everyone to stay home:
Unable to travel anywhere, not able to go back to work or go out to dinner; at least, we have video calls and we can see each other despite the Separation and Exile:
Looking forward into the future, at a time when this is done and we can get together and look back at the past again: ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 26, 2020
not set
|
Sep 29, 2020
not set
|
Aug 05, 2020
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
unknown
| 4.49
| 57
| 2015
| unknown
|
it was amazing
|
I heard about this book on this Ezra Klein Show episode. It is a very good book and the author presents facts about the disproportionate suspicion / pr I heard about this book on this Ezra Klein Show episode. It is a very good book and the author presents facts about the disproportionate suspicion / profiling of Muslims and the amount of media coverage that is given to "professional Islamophobes", even as Muslims trying to rectify the public image of their religion are given no air time at all. Very important book; I recommend it to anyone who has felt within themselves an inexplicable resistance when thinking about Muslims at a societal level. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 17, 2020
|
Sep 21, 2020
|
Jan 23, 2020
| ||||||||||||||||||
1473637465
| 9781473637467
| 1473637465
| 4.36
| 167,954
| Apr 03, 2018
| Apr 03, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
I picked this one up because of a recommendation from Kshitij Saraogi. He spoke highly of this book. As soon as I looked this book up, I reached Bill
I picked this one up because of a recommendation from Kshitij Saraogi. He spoke highly of this book. As soon as I looked this book up, I reached Bill Gates' blog speaking incredibly high of this book too. I am so glad I took their advice and read this book. It has significantly changed the tools I use and the way I understand the world. Hans, Ola and Anna Rosling were geniuses to have compiled everything that affects the fundamental way we humans think in ~250 pages. It takes an incredible amount of courage and belief in the facts in front of you to call out every single informed, well educated, wealthy, experienced person in the world. Throughout the book, the authors compare the way people do on the 13 question quiz compared to chimpanzees. That is audacity and belief right there. I think that the stories that Hans puts in periodically in the book serve to make the book feel like something written by someone who really has seen the world change and morph into the amazing place it is today. I don't really think I can add anything to what people have already said about this book. I have taken away three things from this book: 1. If you feel depressed about something happening in the world right now, look into the facts. Watch the news and then look at the numbers yourself. Spend your time understanding what's going on. Compare them to the past. Divide them by the total. Things have undeniably gotten better. They are bad, but they have gotten better and are getting better every day. 2. If you feel that someone is trying to get a rise out of you by triggering your fear instinct or your urgency instinct, exit the room. Take as few decisions as you can. Commit to as little as you possibly can. Drink tea, watch a show that calms your nerves, talk to the people you care about, take a day off. Re-evaluate the problem alone, with only cold hard numbers helping you. Then, go out there and talk to the people you trust to not trigger these instincts in you and get them to tell you what their experience has been. Put all this together and decide later. 3. If you feel that a line going straight to eternity doesn't make sense, find out if the line is actually straight. eg: Userbase of your app won't increase at the same rate as it did in the firt 3 months. It would be crazy to assume that and save resources now. If you feel you are generalizing, look for differences within a group and similarities across groups. Don't blame people. Don't believe experts, simply because they are experts. All this is talk, what really changed for me is surprisingly easy to articulate: I had basically tuned out of the global warming discussion because (a) I was pissed with Western countries blaming huge countries like India and China, when quite obviously they were the ones with the highest CO2 emissions per capita. (b) I looked at the graphs that showed increases of average temperatures by 2 degrees Celsius over nearly 200 years. I wasn't convinced by the data in front of me. I had lost belief in the so-called experts. I am now convinced I need to spend more time understanding this problem. Global Warming is too big a problem for me to do anything for it personally. All I can do though is spend time understanding what is going on. A few quotes that were impactful for me: pg. 69: I'm a very serious "possibilist". That's something I made up. It means someone who neither hopes without reason, nor fears without reasons, someone who constantly resists the overdramatic worldview pg. 69: When women are educated, all kinds of wonderful things happen in societies. pg. 230: Some aspects of the future are easier to predict than others. ... Demographic forecasts are amazingly accurate decades into the future because the systems involved -- essentially, births and deaths -- are quite simple. Children are born grow up, have more children, and then die. Each individual cycle takes roughly 70 years. pg. 137: If the UN forecasts for population growth are correct, and if incomes in Asia and Africa keep growing as now, then the center of gravity of the world market will shift over the next 20 years from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean. Today, the people living in rich countries around the North Atlantic, who represent 11 percent of the world population, make up 60 percent of the Level 4 consumer market. Already by 2027, if incomes keep growing worldwide as they are doing now, then that figure will have shrunk to 50 percent. By 2040, 60 percent of Level 4 consumers will live outside the West. Yes, I think the Western domination of the world economy will soon be over. pg. 247: (speaking of a woman in Bandundu in what is now the Democractic Republic of Congo in 1989) She was able to think critically and express herself with razor-sharp logic and perfect rhetoric at a moment of extreme tension. pg. 247 The world cannot be understood without numbers, nor through numbers alone. A country cannot function without a government, but the government cannot solve every problem. Neither the public sector nor the private sector is always the answer. No single measure of a good society can drive every other aspect of its development. It's not either/or. It's both and it's case-by-case....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 28, 2018
|
Jul 29, 2018
|
Jul 30, 2018
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
4.21
| 50,678
| Mar 13, 2012
| Mar 13, 2012
|
it was amazing
|
This was a book that was very hard to stop reading. I started on a Friday evening and spent the whole weekend reading this book while distractedly att
This was a book that was very hard to stop reading. I started on a Friday evening and spent the whole weekend reading this book while distractedly attending to other household chores, talking to people on the phone, etc. I was basically absorbed enough in this book to completely forget what else happened that weekend. (my journal for the 4 days is pretty much useless) This book is important for a few reasons: 1. Haidt gets to the point quickly. He doesn't beat around the bush. Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow has a similar point about there being two modes of thinking etc. But I have struggled to get through the first few chapters of that book because of just how bone dry that prose was. There were no anecdotes to escape the boredom of talking about important psychological decision making processes. 2. Haidt builds models from scratch. But he does it fast and doesn't start too basic. I think that Haidt's writing is engaging because he has a good knack for what is a good point to start the discussion. He doesn't start from the very basics of evolution or something. He starts from the middle, talks a little bit about how evolution affected the things that we care about, and then quickly moves on to talking about how these things changed and how the two sides of the political spectrum deal with these things. This is the central part of the book: the modules of thinking that we are polarized around: 1. Care/Harm: whom do we feel the need to care for? 2. Fairness/Cheating: are people getting from institutions in proportion to what they put in? 3. Loyalty/Betrayal: are institutions loyal towards the people that elected them or do they fight for people who are not seen as part of the group that elected them? 4. Authority/Subversion: Order or Chaos? Everyone has to play their part in obeying the prevalent authority; is subversion then tolerated? 5. Sanctity/Degradation: is a feeling of purity associated with some political positions? 6. Liberty/Oppression: Is there equality of opportunities for everyone? Is there equality of outcomes for everyone? 3. The Hive Switch This was perhaps the most fascinating part of the book for me. The ideas in this part are very very basic: We are all selfish beings who can act as an effective part of a group if the conditions are just right. Think about everyone coming in to help others when there is a natural disaster or people joining the military to fight wars. Haidt talks about how we have built a society where being selfish is alright, but being selfish during times of crises is frowned upon and can severely affect reputation and mating prospects. He also gives a short intro to how in every major transition in evolutionary history, single units bind together to form a larger unit that is more resilient. single-cell -> multi-cell -> multi-organ -> ... (I should laud his consideration of the subject. He doesn't talk as a scientist with expertise in this field. He talks as a social scientist who has done his reading and is talking about what he feels happened.) Another important point here: Shared intentionality. He argues that humans are the only ones who can do this effectively. We can band together with a single intention and work as a group. Animals don't even come close to something like what we do at large organizations or in armies. Interestingly, Language came after shared intentionality. We developed language to communicate our shared intentions, not the other way around (i.e "since we had language, we were able to communicate our shared intentions" <- WRONG) *** One of the cuter facts in the book: Infants freak out when they see non-Newtonian things happen. i.e A toy car goes through a wall. Even at a young age, they realize that something is off about that. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 07, 2018
|
Dec 10, 2018
|
Jun 21, 2018
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||||
1560252480
| 9781560252481
| 1560252480
| 4.10
| 58,276
| 1978
| Oct 12, 1999
|
it was amazing
| Requiem Requiem I understood the title after I had finished reading the book. For almost 3 years, people I know have been telling me how this is the most disturbing movie about drug addiction ever made and how it changed their perception of the parties involved. I concur with them: this is definitely one hell of a disturbing book. Selby Jr manages to convey the hopelessness and the helplessness of Harry, Tyrone, Marion and Sara in a single sentence:
This book reminded me of everything that is great about reading and why I stick with this habit in the first place. I don’t have anything except good things to say about this book. This book doesn’t have any punctuations. Single quotation marks (like those in I'll) are replaced by forward slashes. There are no double quotes. Thankfully, there are full stops, the characters are very less so it’s possible to make sense of who is talking. I got used to this after reading around 30% of the book. Marion’s character is the most fascinating. Her psychologist’s reaction when she asks him for the money and he asks him about the needle marks in her arm is painful and sums up my thoughts about where the book was going to go in the first half:
And Marion’s answer to that:
This book is worth a read. And then some. The writing is fabulous; the subject matter is dark and disturbing; the characters are vibrant and extremely troubled. A few quotes from the book that I have to share here:
At the end of the day, they just want no hassles. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 29, 2018
|
May 2018
|
Feb 07, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0141034599
| 9780141034591
| 0141034599
| 3.95
| 105,578
| Apr 17, 2007
| 2010
|
it was amazing
|
This has been a life-changing book. The ideas put forth in this book about prediction, our inability to predict, our love for narratives and how we be
This has been a life-changing book. The ideas put forth in this book about prediction, our inability to predict, our love for narratives and how we bend and twist facts into sweet little narratives, and our absolute ineptness in trying to predict the future using flawed models of the past are worth reading several times and internalizing. A lot of this book is filled with passages where NNT shines as writer with a good bit of humor and wit too. This is the Archimedes Chronophone, applied to the future, instead of the past: (sort of)
Another gem of a thought, articulated extremely well:
A word on Bitcoin-ish bubbles:
And finally, the quote that I had printed on a poster, because of how bad-ass it is:
The characters in this book (Yevgenia, Fat Tony) are all endearing as hell and I wish there was a novel about Fat Tony, especially! He seems suave and just the kind of hustler whose stories would be incredibly fun to read. Highly recommended read. Go right ahead and pick this one up, you will NOT regret it! P.S There's a title / subtitle / chapter heading on every single page. This is digest-able philosophy, packed with useful-in-the-real-world ideas. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 25, 2018
|
Feb 11, 2018
|
Jan 09, 2018
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1400078776
| 3.84
| 621,513
| Apr 05, 2005
| Aug 31, 2010
|
it was amazing
|
Writing this review without giving away any of the plot is hard. I am going to try anyway, because I really liked this book. This book takes a surreal
Writing this review without giving away any of the plot is hard. I am going to try anyway, because I really liked this book. This book takes a surreal view of life. One in which the future is obvious, but not clear. You keep expecting something spectacular to happen, only to be reminded that life isn't told in a series of spectacular events, but as a million other small events that coalesce together. There is a sense of impending doom throughout the book. You always feel like the worst is going to be on the next page. Kathy is going to have a big fight with her friends, she is going to discover something devastating about her life, about who she is and why she exists. If you are anxious about not finding out anything even after finishing the book (like I was, when I started the book), don't be. Everything is explained in detail towards the end. Of course, "detail" is relative, because it isn't clearly explained, you have to piece together the different things that you learn. Two things that I really liked about this book: 1. Ishiguro's use of the "master analogy" that runs throughout the book: it's hard to like the book if you don't like this analogy. It's a very simple one and makes a lot of sense. The terms that Ishiguro uses are hard to get out of your head once you realize their logic. 2. The switching back and forth as a narrative device: The story doesn't run linear, but it's not non-linear enough to confuse you. It's just confusing and clear enough to make sense and yet make you feel like you are standing in a room whose size you have an idea of but can't really see because there's smoke all around. To go to an analogy that I really love: It's like walking down your apartment building's corridor in winter with fog and mist all around, you know where the stairs are, of course you do, but you can never be sure. TL; DR I really liked the book, but I can't really talk about it without giving away spoilers. But I really liked the book though. Some quotes:
Incidentally, it's a song on this tape that the book is named after:
...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 02, 2018
|
Sep 13, 2018
|
Oct 07, 2017
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||||
0141439580
| 9780141439587
| 0141439580
| 4.04
| 817,023
| Sep 23, 1815
| May 06, 2003
|
it was amazing
|
THE HYPE IS REAL. AUSTEN IS GREAT. Jane Austen was a mysterious writer to me. She was talked of universally, she was admired everywhere. A character, ev THE HYPE IS REAL. AUSTEN IS GREAT. Jane Austen was a mysterious writer to me. She was talked of universally, she was admired everywhere. A character, even one like Amy Dunne (Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn) wanted men to read Austen and learn something from them. The movie of one of her books, Pride and Prejudice, was GREAT! Emma is a 450 page book, it's a delight to read. Set in late 18th century England, there's no need to say that it is set in a different world. That world is infinitely more formal, more proper and more delightful in almost all its ways and traditions! That has been the most important thing for me, from this book. The formal undertone of all the exchanges, Isabella referring to her father as "Sir", the forceful mention of societal classes and someone's place in society depending on their inheritance, the purity of their blood and the size of their ancestral home. All of these make this book a great read, but at the same time, you can't help feeling like there's something off about the system: About how Jane Fairfax must cry because being a governess is her only resort, or how most people feel Harriet Smith is worth only Robert Martin and not even someone like Mr. Elton. If Austen meant for her reader to actually feel that, I am not sure. She succeeded, nonetheless. But coming then, to the actual story of the book. The third volume of the book is by far the fastest moving with a story that rolls on and on with people matching up and marrying, left and right. The first two volumes both end in deep disappointment and surprisingly, it's Emma herself(!!) whose fate lies in jeopardy at the end Volume 2. SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS The book though, ends in a really sweet place. Emma pairs up with someone who is worthy of her and their match is very becoming, indeed! The topic of women and marriage is the overpowering centre of this book and if you don't want to read formal chats about why it is inappropriate for someone to speak loudly at the dinner table, or why a particular person's pale complexion says a lot more than just that she isn't well, this book isn't for you. If you are unsure, definitely read it! I look forward to reading more of Austen! (I wish her books were shorter though) ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 30, 2017
|
May 04, 2017
|
Mar 27, 2017
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
4.13
| 1,877,136
| 1985
| Apr 1998
|
it was amazing
|
For a moment or two, I considered that this might be a dystopia that has proven itself to be better than 1984, even. The more I thought about that, th
For a moment or two, I considered that this might be a dystopia that has proven itself to be better than 1984, even. The more I thought about that, the more I was convinced that it was definitely better than 1984, this book never explicitly explains anything. Be it the room that Offred lives in, the commander's chambers, the bedroom with Serena, the sitting room, the "RED" center, everything is described in pieces and among other people's dialogues or the setups for their dialogues. All in all, this is a VERY COMPLEX book to read, there are many moving parts and I can guarantee that there's almost nothing that can be understood (except for the expectation of the facts in the synopsis) for the first few chapters, but soon after that the story picks up. Somewhere around half the book, the back story is revealed: the fog clears and the dust settles, there's some end in sight at least. The next 100 pages go by rather fast and I didn't even notice the pages going by so fast. The story was THAT engrossing! This book was shocking. The ease with which Offred, the protagonist describes the acceptance of the coup, the suspension of the constitution is frightening. It really puts the power of the government in perspective, there's almost nothing that the subjects (governed) can do when the government decides to take an extreme measure. Eg: Demonetisation in India in November 2016. It was announced at 8 pm, it was in effect starting midnight. Botched implementation, millions of man-hours wasted by people in standing in ATM queues, forcefully having to use digital means of payment effectively reducing the flow of portable cash in the system. Eerily enough, this is EXACTLY the situation that leads to the world Offred lives in and describes throughout the book. The final few pages are again about hope and it's existence. I think this ending pushed it just that little bit above 1984. A dystopia is not about showing a bad fictional world, that's horror without the psychic elements. A dystopia should show a world that's clearly screwed up, but the characters in it haven't yet lost their sense of the "days before" this happened and haven't given up hope at getting even that small chance to improve their lives, in my opinion. This hope is what defines characters and what satisfies me as a reader. In 1984, I really wanted a happy ending for Winston, but what ended up happening to him was hideous and depressing, rather than being thought provoking and something that gives you pause to think about what you want the end to be for the main character. For eg, I want Offred to be safe in a safe house and for her to escape to England and start a new family and see the shadows of Luke and her daughter in her husband and children there. The author made space for this possibility, for this "alternate ending", if you will, and that's what makes this book a sweet read! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Apr 22, 2019
Mar 08, 2017
|
Apr 24, 2019
Mar 27, 2017
|
Mar 09, 2017
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
9780141045573
| 0141045574
| 3.98
| 13,988
| 1945
| Jun 29, 2009
|
really liked it
|
Phew. This is a dense book. So dense. Right off the bat, there's one thing to acknowledge right away. All the characters in this book are profoundly un Phew. This is a dense book. So dense. Right off the bat, there's one thing to acknowledge right away. All the characters in this book are profoundly unhappy, about their lives, they are uncertain about their future, they are always obsessing over the people they know and want to be close to, they want to suffer, they want to see others suffer, it's a huge set of Bipolar people who are always in a love-hate relationship with everyone else. The only exception is perhaps the Ivich-and-Boris relationship, they are always with each other, no matter what, but even Boris agrees at one point that although he doesn't understand all the allusions Ivich makes, it's better to pretend to understand to keep the spell going. The book ends on a high note, a note that I never thought would come in this kind of a book. I was more or less prepared for an ending that would leave most of the people unhappy, but atleast a few people were happy. I will leave you guessing as to who they were. And finally, Sartre and Existentialism. The whole book is spewed with inner monologues by Mathieu, Daniel, Boris (only the male characters, probably because Sartre himself couldn't write from a female perspective. Well done there!), about the characterisitcs of being trule free, they know that it has eluded them, and they might never get there, but that doesn't stop them from thinking about what they could do to get there, what things they might have let go of, and what they would definitely have to gain. Mathieu at one point talks about suffering and how he still needs to suffer a lot more, Boris wants everything to be picture-perfect, and the way it is all the time, Daniel wants to die because he is annoyed and ashamed with himself, and thinks that doing that one thing will finally let him be free. It's elusive and none of them get to it in this book at least, but this is a series of 3 books. I certainly plan to read more Sartre. This flavor of philosophy is different from Albert Camus' The Rebel, which I was barely able to get past 50 pages of. That was heavy, devoid of plot or characters and filled with philosophical ramblings. Sartre's plot-related philosophical rambling is easier to digest, and although it is an acquired taste, the size of his books and the allure of his characters does make the time spent on it worthwhile! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 17, 2016
|
Dec 22, 2016
|
Dec 17, 2016
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||
015626224X
| 9780156262248
| 015626224X
| 4.09
| 80,358
| 1933
| Mar 15, 1972
|
it was amazing
|
This book has some really good fiction! The question of whether this is actually fiction, or just auto-biographical from the author's own experience i
This book has some really good fiction! The question of whether this is actually fiction, or just auto-biographical from the author's own experience is a good one, and I guess it's partly autobiographical (as the summary says). In any case, it's a good book! There are some subtle references to capitalism (?) here, but I guess that it depends on what mindset you are reading this book with, and you could read these kind of references into any book written around the World War 2 time. There are a few lines, some of which might seem rather obvious in retrospect, but when presented as structured quotes they sound really good:
This list goes on and on. It's a really good book! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 10, 2017
|
Feb 19, 2017
|
Nov 27, 2016
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0060929871
| 9780060929879
| 0060929871
| 3.99
| 1,731,353
| 1932
| Sep 01, 1998
|
it was amazing
|
The beginning of this book is fascinating science fiction. And then, the book moves slowly into a spiral of amazing writing that it never recovers fro
The beginning of this book is fascinating science fiction. And then, the book moves slowly into a spiral of amazing writing that it never recovers from. The book gets progressively better and better. The number of Shakespeare quotations increase and the splitting of the life that is lived in London is presented, and eventually, it's death alone that can save people who want to be unhappy and undergo struggles from a world with drug-induced happiness, where everyone belongs to everyone else.
...more
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 03, 2016
|
Sep 09, 2016
|
Sep 03, 2016
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0316055433
| 9780316055437
| 0316055433
| 3.93
| 860,339
| Sep 23, 2013
| Oct 22, 2013
|
it was amazing
|
After reading this book, I have a newfound respect for art. Mainly, paintings, sculptures, pots, utensils, things that are kept in museums. I realize
After reading this book, I have a newfound respect for art. Mainly, paintings, sculptures, pots, utensils, things that are kept in museums. I realize now that these objects, some of them bare stones from 1000s of years ago, have survived all this while and will survive for a lot longer. When I saw them, I became a part of their eternity. They became a part of my life. That's what this book is about: art not for art's sake, art as the driving force of mankind, a deeper understanding of art than a transient piece that evokes some feelings in us. Heavy preface, I know. The one liner wasn't hard to come up with: Theo Decker loses his mom in a museum accident, he takes a painting from that museum, and everything spirals from there. This book has great writing. It's not easy to read because somewhere around the middle of the book the plot stalls. Theo is in a drug-ridden haze which he is unwilling to come out of. It's really boring to read about, and I (legit) felt like I was in some sort of a haze too because I was falling asleep reading the book and waking up not knowing where I had left off or what was going on; because what was happening 40 pages ago felt exactly like what was happening right now. My point is, this book closely resembles what Theo's thoughts were at the moment you are reading them. In fact, at the end of the book, he admits to it when he says that he wrote this as a journal in real time that he kept right from when he was a child and a teacher of his gave him a journal to cope with his mother's death. So, when you read this book, you have this up-and-down feeling as if you are feeling exactly what Theo is feeling and going through what Theo is going through but one looking glass away; as if he has taken away the soul of what was happening to him and is telling you just the facts making it harder for you to wrap your head around what sort of a room he is or what he is doing. Like having a normal lens looking at his life instead of a wide angle lens. Your understanding lacks perspective and throughout the book, you need to be alert and supply this consciously. His mother's death is something that overshadows the book like a cloud covering the sun on some overcast day. About 15 years later, he still brings her up in conversation. He still traces everything that he does back to her. It's incredibly heart breaking and sad. It scared me in the beginning of the book when he says things like How was it possible to miss someone as much as I missed my mother? I missed her so much I wanted to die: a hard, physical longing, like a craving for air underwater. The book is also about the Barbours. When Theo goes to their house, we see their house only from his perspective: a kid who has just lost the only parent he loved and doesn't know how to deal with the world yet. When he returns after all those years to meet the Barbours, I thought about it for the first time from their perspective and realized the impact that he must have had on them! It's really beautiful to read it. The book is also about Boris. About the difficulties of his life, about how similar his life is to Theo's, about how differently they both approach what happened to them, about how Boris says Theo's father is good even though he says it only because Theo's dad would never be as brutal as he is with Theo with Boris, his son's friend, a third person: the distance makes him decent. And sometimes that is what you need to be decent with someone else: distance. Too close is not always good. [image] And finally, perhaps most importantly, this book is about The Goldfinch. Not the painting as much as the finch itself. The little guy who spent his whole life chained to the wall, who looks at you earnestly from nearly 400 years ago. What was the bird like? Did children like him? Did he ever fly freely in the sky or was he chained at birth? The last few pages of this book summarize everything that Theo and Welty and Boris and anyone who came in contact with this painting, even Horst, felt about this painting. ... And if I could go back in time I’d clip the chain in a heartbeat and never care a minute that the picture was never painted. Only it’s more complicated than that. Who knows why Fabritius painted the goldfinch at all? A tiny, stand-alone masterpiece, unique of all its kind? And we can never know that. That was a heavy review to write. I should put some of the quotes I like here, just in case you need more convincing to go right ahead and pick this book up: What had happened, I knew, was irrevocable, yet at the same time it seemed there had to be some way I could go back to the rainy street and make it all happen differently. ‘When you feel homesick,’ he said, ‘just look up. Because the moon is the same wherever you go.’ So after he died, and I had to go to Aunt Bess – I mean, even now, in the city, when I see a full moon, it’s like he’s telling me not to look back or feel sad about things, that home is wherever I am.” She kissed me on the nose. “Or where you are, puppy. The center of my earth is you.” Yet all these aspects were – to me – so tender and particular they moved me to despair. With a beautiful girl I could have consoled myself that she was out of my league; that I was so haunted and stirred even by her plainness suggested – ominously – a love more binding than physical affection, some tar-pit of the soul where I might flop around and malinger for years. “It’s a joke, the Fabritius. It has a joke at its heart. And that’s what all the very greatest masters do. Rembrandt. Velázquez. Late Titian. They make jokes. They amuse themselves. They build up the illusion, the trick – but, step closer? it falls apart into brushstrokes. Abstract, unearthly. A different and much deeper sort of beauty altogether. The thing and yet not the thing. I should say that that one tiny painting puts Fabritius in the rank of the greatest painters who ever lived. That life – whatever else it is – is short. That fate is cruel but maybe not random. That Nature (meaning Death) always wins but that doesn’t mean we have to bow and grovel to it. That maybe even if we’re not always so glad to be here, it’s our task to immerse ourselves anyway: wade straight through it, right through the cesspool, while keeping eyes and hearts open. And in the midst of our dying, as we rise from the organic and sink back ignominiously into the organic, it is a glory and a privilege to love what Death doesn’t touch. Insofar as it is immortal (and it is) I have a small, bright, immutable part in that immortality. It exists; and it keeps on existing. And I add my own love to the history of people who have loved beautiful things, and looked out for them, and pulled them from the fire, and sought them when they were lost, and tried to preserve them and save them while passing them along literally from hand to hand, singing out brilliantly from the wreck of time to the next generation of lovers, and the next. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 17, 2018
|
Jun 2018
|
Mar 29, 2016
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
4.19
| 4,163,503
| Jun 08, 1949
| Jul 01, 1950
|
it was amazing
|
Dystopia. Disturbing. I was hardly able to read through the middle chapters of Part 3. It was all so grotesque, the imagery, the man himself, the chan
Dystopia. Disturbing. I was hardly able to read through the middle chapters of Part 3. It was all so grotesque, the imagery, the man himself, the change his mind was going through, the things a collectivist group is capable of. Ew. If that's the right emotion. Parts 1 and 2 are shocking, hard to believe, fascinating and frightening all at the same time. It's hard to believe that people would exist in a society as the one depicted, but at the same time, it is easy to understand why there is no revolution. When you have no one to compare yourself to, you tend to resign yourself to what you have, take pleasure in the few privileges accorded on you by the power above, the Party, Big Brother. The book by Emmanuel Goldstein is perhaps my favorite part of the book. OR rather, the most logical? I don't know, but it made sense. The explanations, "War is Peace" and "Ignorance is Strength", these slogans are enraging when in the Part 1 of the book but they make sense in Part 3. The world makes sense once you know why it is the way it is. I had actually planned to read another Dystopian novel, The Man in the High Castle, I am not sure if I would now. Stay away from Dystopia because it is disturbing? Nah, this is probably one of the few books that people read books for. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 05, 2016
|
Jan 11, 2016
|
Jan 01, 2016
|
Mass Market Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
0241953243
| 9780241953242
| 0241953243
| 3.88
| 789,237
| Sep 1955
| 2011
|
it was amazing
|
It is an amazing book. I would read it for the writing alone, every other sentence is a quote, and every ten pages you meet a sentence, so intelligent
It is an amazing book. I would read it for the writing alone, every other sentence is a quote, and every ten pages you meet a sentence, so intelligently crafted, that you just HAVE to re-read it, and then bask in the sun, at the end of the tunnel leading down to the meaning of those few words. THAT is awesome! Whether the pointedly reduced usage of punctuation marks all through the book is intentional or accidental, I can't say, but makes the experience a whole lot more wholesome. So, tl; dr GREAT writing! There is a small and interesting plot, a twist at the end of the book that is pretty hard to figure out (I was maybe 40% to the solution, no regrets though), and a small number of deliciously crafted characters. Humbert of course, is the best, probably because he is the narrator. As for the weird part of the book, well, yeah. Yes, it is the point of view of a paedophile. Yes, he is the protagonist. No, I don't feel bad reading this book in public. Here's what I read about this on a comment on Reddit, and I am going to add my own sentences to it and reiterate here: (The comment is from memory) I think it is disturbing that Nabokov can portray a modern paedophilic man as a sweet and lovable character. That's what disturbs me more than the really rare reader who stares at me when I read or leaf through this book in public I love this book. It is some of the best writing I have read, the wordplay, the characters and the final few pages of this book. And the humour. Oh yeah, there's a lot of that. From pronouncing himself a psychoanalyst, to declaring that people who don't like Fountain pens are people who have a fetish for water, there's a lot of it equally spread across the book. So, it is a humourous book, about a paedophilic man and a 12 year old girl, both of whom travel around America, and finally ... I won't spoil it for you. Go on, read! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 14, 2016
|
Mar 29, 2016
|
Dec 30, 2015
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1400031702
| 9781400031702
| 1400031702
| 4.17
| 562,153
| Sep 16, 1992
| Sep 11, 1992
|
it was amazing
|
This was probably the first book that I was determined to read because of this awesome review. I started reading, and in the prologue, I discovered th
This was probably the first book that I was determined to read because of this awesome review. I started reading, and in the prologue, I discovered that they had killed their friend. An attrocious act, on the face of it, but surprisingly towards the end, I was empathising with their situation, and although, I feel that this may not have been the best course, I can't question the decision that they made to kill their friend. That, only because of some really involved and amazing writing! Starting out, the book feels really obscure, the characters seem to be ideal versions, who have had too much of education of the Classics, and have withdrawn into a world of their own where murder is required, and covering it up will only make the act harder to digest. The first five chapters delve into Bunny. The last three are set after the act. Initially, the book is heavy with philosophical references, and description of everything in general. But as the book proceeds, it gets darker and concentrates more on the plot itself, rather than the surroundings. Throughout the book, I felt as if Richard (the narrator) is a passive part of it all, and is able to provide us with something more than just a plain narration of what's going on, but something that is more involved with his own emotional conflict, and the perceived lack of remorse in his accomplices. This book does lend itself to a movie wonderfully, and now I wish there was a movie based on this book. I am intrigued by her style, and her characters, but most of all, the boldness of the premise of this book. Re-Read: August 25th, 2019 The first time I read a PDF version of the book. It was nearly 4 years ago and I remember reading a really good review and that being the reason I started reading this book. Well, this book has aged incredibly WELL! I absolutely loved the nuances that I was able to catch on the second time that I read this book. This time, I read it on a Kindle, so I was able to mark several passages that I thought were just absolute FIRE!
Over-all, the book evoked the same kind of emotions in me, I believe. You start with the disbelief: is there ever anything that a person can do to you that would make you want to kill them in cold blood? Then, you learn more about the 5. In particular, I learnt an incredible amount about Bunny in the first section of the book. Then, you realize how cruel he is, and how he gets on everyone's nerves all the time. And how he does it with a relish for the results.
The above quote describes perfectly the way Bunny was blackmailing all of them. And then, the act. Once it happens though, you are only half-way done. This book is much more a story about the consequences of one decision than it is about the build-up to that decision. People dislike other people a lot. It comes quite naturally. Taking the decision that this dislike would lead us to, is quote natural too. But the consequences of that decision are un-savoury and push the remaining 5 people (including the narrator) into an extremely unpleasant sequence of events. Richard has a particularly enlightening realization.
Richard was Bunny's only potential ally. He was the only "outsider", so to speak. He was the only one in their group, who Bunny believed didn't know about the act, and was confident wouldn't approve of, if Bunny ever chose to tell Richard. In turning Richard on to his side, in a fashion that was so natural that one might even question this particular theory as cynical or diabolical, Henry displays his master-y of people and understanding what motivates them. (Henry would have been one hell of an engineering manager!) Finally, I have never stopped admiring Camilla for the amazing character that she is! In this book, particularly, she is the hinge to all the guys around her. She is the person around whom all the others spin. In some ways, Henry was the leader of the group, he was flying the plane. But Camilla was the Pursor, she was the one responsible for charming the outsiders and keeping them happy. (including us, the readers). Tartt puts the reader in Richard's place, that's quite clear. And then, in drawing similarities between Richard and Camilla, she forces us to see Camilla as the endearing one. The character that you can't quite not love. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Jul 14, 2019
Dec 20, 2015
|
Aug 25, 2019
Dec 24, 2015
|
Dec 16, 2015
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
4.12
| 2,856,093
| May 14, 2012
| Apr 22, 2014
|
it was amazing
| What are you thinking, Amy? How are you feeling? Who are you? What have we done to each other? What will we do? This book. Oh, this book. Where do I st What are you thinking, Amy? How are you feeling? Who are you? What have we done to each other? What will we do? This book. Oh, this book. Where do I start? I love the narration, I love the look inside beloved Amy's busy, working round the clock brain. Now, I had already seen the movie. So the biggest twist in the book, which if you don't know by now, you should stop reading right here. No, seriously stop. Don't blame me when the movie is spoilt because you continued to read. Anyway, the biggest twist in the book was known to me. But this didn't make the experience of reading the book even a little bit bad. If anything, it kept me on the edge, anticipating the start of the next chapter and Amy returning at any moment. Any moment. A lot of the book is about Amy, and Nick. Some of it is about Go, and even less about Mama Maureen and Nick's Dad. The least is said about Marybeth and Rand. But after reading this book, and thinking about what really went wrong, I guess it's these two. The dream couple, the couple that never fights, the couple that has probably never made a mistake. Amy finds them disgusting and repulsive after really understand what the Amazing Amy books did to her. Nick sees in Rand the father figure he lacked all his life. I feel like they are the people who are really screwed up. Through the books, it was almost like they were telling Amy how to behave, and she was exactly that. An unbelievably smart, alpha female who doesn't back down from a fight, and always must get what she deserves. What's the point of being together, if you are not the happiest? This fits her parents very well. They were together, they were never really in a fight, they always had their hands around the other's waist. And that's the image of marriage that has forever been etched in young Amy's mind. The characters are all fetching, Boney is slightly different from the movie, she's a little bit more of a hometown girl, Gilpin is in the driving seat in a lot of the cases where in the movie it was always Boney who was driving the investigation. This is one book that I will find hard to stop thinking about. I am done with the review, but Amy must always have the last word. I waited patiently - years - for the pendulum, to swing the other way, for men to start reading Jane Austen, learn how to knit, pretend to love cosmos, organize scrapbook parties, and make out with each other while we leer. And then we'd say, Yeah, he's a Cool Guy...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 14, 2016
|
Oct 31, 2016
|
Dec 02, 2015
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
0099556316
| 9780099556312
| 0099556316
| 3.73
| 81,704
| Jan 02, 1996
| 2006
|
it was amazing
|
personally, I think that this is one of the best books by Crichton. Although, at the end of the book, you may end up being just that little bit scared
personally, I think that this is one of the best books by Crichton. Although, at the end of the book, you may end up being just that little bit scared to fly, believe me, the fear passes. and soon becomes empowering, so you can actually feel the wheel turning, as you take off, cruise or land. the avionics, the forces, everything is explained in much detail, but at every step, skipping the drab text book language. Crichton rules! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jul 05, 2015
|
Paperback
|
