MJ’s review of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change > Likes and Comments
95 likes · Like
MJ wrote: "Condescending fake-friendliness masking resentment and loathing."
I liked this review, even though it's very long.
I have a good habit: every morning I punch a businessman. Gets the endorphins flowing. Ian: tsk, be a team player!
Well, I've already suggested one explanation for this book in my review. But having just read a de Ségur fairy tale, here's a second possibility: Stephen R. Covey was a kind, noble philosopher who foolishly offended a powerful witch. She put a curse on him that made everything he said come out as a cross between managerspeak and psychobabble. Then the good fairy came by shortly after (for some reason, she's always late), and said that she couldn't change what her sister had done, but it would still make him very rich.
Actually, I like this one better. Go Madame de Ségur!
I think this gibberish is beyond the reach of most witches. They have a very creative vocabulary compared to.
Anyway, who wants to change? I am who I am today through long years of self-loathing, isolation and disgust for the human race. I worked hard for my status!
MJ wrote: "I think this gibberish is beyond the reach of most witches. They have a very creative vocabulary compared to.."
Witches have their own highly effective ways:
http://www.potw.org/archive/potw283.html
Still my favourite quote of Macbeth: "Double, double, toil and trouble; fire burn and cauldron bubble!" It's catchy.
MJ wrote: "Stephen R. Covey wrote: "What you are shouts so loudly in my ears I cannot hear what you say."."
You're being too harsh here, MJ. Give the guy a break. He was just revealing his hipster cool paraphrasing Pink Floyd.
Rule of effective persons #1: "Like reviews after doing a quick scan of them, and if you're going to comment, make it snappy".
Mike wrote: "So you don't like Steely Dan because they never were a calandar-worthy boy band, huh?"
I wonder how many people know where the name Steely Dan came from?
Mike wrote: "(I always kinda liked Steely Dan--the band)"
Me too. Much underestimated as (and possibly, by) intellectuals. I still love the guitars in "Reelin' in the Years".
Mike wrote: "I saw them a couple years ago. Quite good, but def not easy to look at."
People say the same about us/me.
I always associated that band with snoozy mediocrity, but maybe I was wrong! And I don't know whence their origins. I'm sure it's all rather fascinating.
In the British music press when I was a teenager, Steely Dan were a byword for the dullest of dadrock. And though these days I find quite a lot of the other contents of (dadrock bible)
Mojo
interesting (!), I kind of still see them in that context, as I've never heard of them attracting younger fans.
NME:
"The band's music is characterized by complex jazz-influenced structures and harmonies played by Becker and Fagen along with a revolving cast of rock and pop studio musicians. Steely Dan's "cerebral, wry and eccentric" lyrics, often filled with sharp sarcasm, touch upon such themes as drugs, love affairs, and crime. The pair are well known for their near-obsessive perfectionism in the recording studio, the most extreme example being that Becker and Fagen used at least 42 different studio musicians, 11 engineers, and took over a year to record the tracks that resulted in 1980's Gaucho--an album that contains only seven songs."
In other words, they are the MJ of rock.
Ian wrote: "In other words, they are the MJ of rock. "
Pfft. My brother (near twice my age) and father (thrice my age) are Steely Dan fans so I must have attached the "dadrock" label to them for that reason. They sound brilliant in theory. It's interesting how the "near-obsessive perfectionism" of bands makes absolutely no difference to how the audience receive an album. My Bloody Valentine's Loveless is beautiful but reeks of the gaslamp as Kingsley said about Martin.
It's interesting how the "near-obsessive perfectionism" of bands makes absolutely no difference to how the audience receive an album.
It simply seems to gain them more respect from other musicians and aspiring musicians. Whereas the casual radio listener can't really tell the difference.
In other words, they are the MJ of rock.
And perhaps it's other writer-types who most appreciate writing like yours.
Especially those bits where so much meaning is distilled into far fewer words than I would generally take to say the same thing. Having tried, I know it's quite difficult. < /sycophant>
Wikipedia says the album 'Loveless' took nearly two years to make and they nearly bankrupted their record label! Woohoo! I love alternative rock bands, I am definitely checking them out. I am always in search of new (to me) music.
MJ, how many copies of Loveless do you have? If two or more, then haven't you disproved your argument?
Fathers are never to be trusted in their asssessment of their sons' creative or romantic ventures.
Thanks, Anto. The only reason I condense is I set myself about ten minutes to write most reviews, with exceptions.
Yolande: Loveless is a brilliant chill-out album, except it is louder than anything in history. I wrote lots of Belch to it.
Ian: I had a copy but I sold it. Still have it on my (now) dead hard drive, with all my other music. Sob!
There is a skill to well-written brevity though. It requires the best choice of words and that takes more time for some than for others.
This Blaise Pascal quote is something which I could apply to more and more of my emails, especially in the last year or so: “I have only made this letter longer because I have not had the time to make it shorter."
Steely Dan has soul! "White Soul"! i read somewhere that that exists and so i am willing to suspend disbelief. for teh children. the white children.
The review is beyond me. Its full of loathing and unfounded criticism. Appears to be more like an image of emotions formed in MJ's mind than a serious attempt to analyze the worth of this work
Mohit wrote: "The review is beyond me. Its full of loathing and unfounded criticism. Appears to be more like an image of emotions formed in MJ's mind than a serious attempt to analyze the worth of this work"
This comment is beyond me. Its[sic] full of loving and unfrowned critter schism. A pears Toby moah! Like am I mage of emoticons terraformed in a Maister Joe mind the step seriously a temptation anal & Isis wrath of work.
You are clearly not ready to understand this book. Refer to Principle 1: response-ability. Move on veeery slowly from there.
Wikipedia says the album 'Loveless' took nearly two years to make and they nearly bankrupted their record label! Woohoo! I love alternative rock bands, I am definitely checking them out. I am always in search of new (to me) music.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
MJ wrote: "Condescending fake-friendliness masking resentment and loathing."I liked this review, even though it's very long.
I have a good habit: every morning I punch a businessman. Gets the endorphins flowing. Ian: tsk, be a team player!
Well, I've already suggested one explanation for this book in my review. But having just read a de Ségur fairy tale, here's a second possibility: Stephen R. Covey was a kind, noble philosopher who foolishly offended a powerful witch. She put a curse on him that made everything he said come out as a cross between managerspeak and psychobabble. Then the good fairy came by shortly after (for some reason, she's always late), and said that she couldn't change what her sister had done, but it would still make him very rich.Actually, I like this one better. Go Madame de Ségur!
Ian wrote: "Some people are born rich and others have richness thrust upon them, and then there is us."
Some people are just mean to be ineffectual. It is a sub-tenet of the Laws of Perpetual Misery.
Some people are just mean to be ineffectual. It is a sub-tenet of the Laws of Perpetual Misery.
Ian wrote: "I never mean to be ineffectual. It just happens that way."
Happiness is a tangible source of energy. It has to be distributed evenly in the world, but never fairly.
Happiness is a tangible source of energy. It has to be distributed evenly in the world, but never fairly.
I think this gibberish is beyond the reach of most witches. They have a very creative vocabulary compared to. Anyway, who wants to change? I am who I am today through long years of self-loathing, isolation and disgust for the human race. I worked hard for my status!
MJ wrote: "Anyway, who wants to change? I am who I am today through long years of self-loathing, isolation and disgust for the human race. I worked hard for my status! "
Ditto.
Ditto.
MJ wrote: "I think this gibberish is beyond the reach of most witches. They have a very creative vocabulary compared to.."Witches have their own highly effective ways:
http://www.potw.org/archive/potw283.html
Still my favourite quote of Macbeth: "Double, double, toil and trouble; fire burn and cauldron bubble!" It's catchy.
MJ wrote: "Stephen R. Covey wrote: "What you are shouts so loudly in my ears I cannot hear what you say."."You're being too harsh here, MJ. Give the guy a break. He was just revealing his hipster cool paraphrasing Pink Floyd.
Rule of effective persons #1: "Like reviews after doing a quick scan of them, and if you're going to comment, make it snappy".
Mike wrote: "So you don't like Steely Dan because they never were a calandar-worthy boy band, huh?"I wonder how many people know where the name Steely Dan came from?
Mike wrote: "(I always kinda liked Steely Dan--the band)"Me too. Much underestimated as (and possibly, by) intellectuals. I still love the guitars in "Reelin' in the Years".
Mike wrote: "I saw them a couple years ago. Quite good, but def not easy to look at."People say the same about us/me.
I always associated that band with snoozy mediocrity, but maybe I was wrong! And I don't know whence their origins. I'm sure it's all rather fascinating.
In the British music press when I was a teenager, Steely Dan were a byword for the dullest of dadrock. And though these days I find quite a lot of the other contents of (dadrock bible)
Mojo
interesting (!), I kind of still see them in that context, as I've never heard of them attracting younger fans.
NME:"The band's music is characterized by complex jazz-influenced structures and harmonies played by Becker and Fagen along with a revolving cast of rock and pop studio musicians. Steely Dan's "cerebral, wry and eccentric" lyrics, often filled with sharp sarcasm, touch upon such themes as drugs, love affairs, and crime. The pair are well known for their near-obsessive perfectionism in the recording studio, the most extreme example being that Becker and Fagen used at least 42 different studio musicians, 11 engineers, and took over a year to record the tracks that resulted in 1980's Gaucho--an album that contains only seven songs."
In other words, they are the MJ of rock.
Ian wrote: "In other words, they are the MJ of rock. "Pfft. My brother (near twice my age) and father (thrice my age) are Steely Dan fans so I must have attached the "dadrock" label to them for that reason. They sound brilliant in theory. It's interesting how the "near-obsessive perfectionism" of bands makes absolutely no difference to how the audience receive an album. My Bloody Valentine's Loveless is beautiful but reeks of the gaslamp as Kingsley said about Martin.
It's interesting how the "near-obsessive perfectionism" of bands makes absolutely no difference to how the audience receive an album.It simply seems to gain them more respect from other musicians and aspiring musicians. Whereas the casual radio listener can't really tell the difference.
In other words, they are the MJ of rock.
And perhaps it's other writer-types who most appreciate writing like yours.
Especially those bits where so much meaning is distilled into far fewer words than I would generally take to say the same thing. Having tried, I know it's quite difficult. < /sycophant>
Wikipedia says the album 'Loveless' took nearly two years to make and they nearly bankrupted their record label! Woohoo! I love alternative rock bands, I am definitely checking them out. I am always in search of new (to me) music.
MJ, how many copies of Loveless do you have? If two or more, then haven't you disproved your argument?Fathers are never to be trusted in their asssessment of their sons' creative or romantic ventures.
Thanks, Anto. The only reason I condense is I set myself about ten minutes to write most reviews, with exceptions. Yolande: Loveless is a brilliant chill-out album, except it is louder than anything in history. I wrote lots of Belch to it.
Ian: I had a copy but I sold it. Still have it on my (now) dead hard drive, with all my other music. Sob!
There is a skill to well-written brevity though. It requires the best choice of words and that takes more time for some than for others.This Blaise Pascal quote is something which I could apply to more and more of my emails, especially in the last year or so: “I have only made this letter longer because I have not had the time to make it shorter."
Steely Dan has soul! "White Soul"! i read somewhere that that exists and so i am willing to suspend disbelief. for teh children. the white children.
The review is beyond me. Its full of loathing and unfounded criticism. Appears to be more like an image of emotions formed in MJ's mind than a serious attempt to analyze the worth of this work
Mohit wrote: "The review is beyond me. Its full of loathing and unfounded criticism. Appears to be more like an image of emotions formed in MJ's mind than a serious attempt to analyze the worth of this work"This comment is beyond me. Its[sic] full of loving and unfrowned critter schism. A pears Toby moah! Like am I mage of emoticons terraformed in a Maister Joe mind the step seriously a temptation anal & Isis wrath of work.
You are clearly not ready to understand this book. Refer to Principle 1: response-ability. Move on veeery slowly from there.
Wikipedia says the album 'Loveless' took nearly two years to make and they nearly bankrupted their record label! Woohoo! I love alternative rock bands, I am definitely checking them out. I am always in search of new (to me) music.



I want to read your book of Highly effective habits.