"And his research often relies on the "correlation = causation" mistake."
It is exactly what bothers me. Plus over-hyped journalistic style of writing (where every person is introduced by his external titles and achievements... as if his/her deeds are not enough) and actually reliance on those authorities per se (again - as if first hand knowledge is not enough). I admire the message of this book, but it could be well summarised into 30 pages that would be actually worth my time.
Flagging a post will send it to the Goodreads Customer Care team for review.
We take abuse seriously in our discussion boards.
Only flag comments that clearly need our attention.
As a general rule we do not censor any content on the site.
The only content we will consider removing is spam,
slanderous attacks on other members,
or extremely offensive content (eg. pornography, pro-Nazi, child abuse, etc).
We will not remove any content for bad language alone, or being critical
of a particular book.
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
It is exactly what bothers me. Plus over-hyped journalistic style of writing (where every person is introduced by his external titles and achievements... as if his/her deeds are not enough) and actually reliance on those authorities per se (again - as if first hand knowledge is not enough). I admire the message of this book, but it could be well summarised into 30 pages that would be actually worth my time.