Ellie asked:

How old should someone be before reading this book?

To answer questions about Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, please sign up.
Elaine Sabin-Simpson I don't believe in censoring what kids read- if they're old enough to pick up books without pictures, and can manage the level of the vocabulary, let them get on with it.
Yve I was 17 when I first read this book. I think someone should be around that age (15-18+) before reading it. Sex is more insinuated than explicit, but the tackling of fanatical religion and its disturbing side effects might be disturbing to younger people. And it's not a very "straightforward" novel so I think you need to be a bit older to appreciate that.
Cendre I think too around 15.
Pamela I too think around 15. I found this book very eye opening. When i read this book i was just coming out in the 80's. It was the rave around then. It was good to read then and still.
wing Any age. As long as you hold just *enough* maturity than I guess it's good to go for anyone 10+
Hilo I'm 28 now and I think it's the perfect age to read it ^^ Especially when you're a former christian fundamentalist who needs a long time for recovery.
Judy About 11 is just right I think. The first year of secondary school is the best time to put aside (not completley though) childish books and get your teeth into more mature reading.
Image for Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit
Rate this book
Clear rating

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more