Evan Exempt
Evan Exempt asked:

One-third of the way through. I don't care for the main character (Kovacs); this normally wouldn't be such a big deal except for the fact that the story is narrated in first person, so there is essentially no escaping from this socially inept detective character. I personally feel that this novel should have been narrated in third person, which would have offered more narrative flexibility. Anyone else feel this way?

To answer questions about Altered Carbon, please sign up.
Lucius Rippeteau i enjoyed the 1st person. it hardened the Sci-fi-noir feel. hard boiled badass with a history and unresolved personal internal conflicts. as if we are hearing this as his friend. and judging as a friend, on a personal level, not on a society level.
Stormrunner Takeshi Kovacs is a Cyberpunk 'hero' -- meaning he's not quite good, and not quite bad. His decisions and moral compass are somewhat driven by survival, and he is a bit of an antihero. This is, to me at least, a common theme in Cyberpunk -- and a desirable one. I like that he has to choose between things often in the book, neither of which are entirely pleasant, or "good" in the traditional sense. To me this keeps it gritty, believable, and helps the noir-esque overtones of the novel.
Mike Bennewitz I don't. I like the character. He is a quintessential laconic, sardonic, hard-boild detective with extremely dry humor.
Aigars Mahinovs He is not socially inept. His training has cut him out of the society and trained him in observing and exploiting any society he might encounter. So he is doing amazingly well for a man in an alien (to him) world on a timer to figure out things that locals can not.
David Clifford Third person wouldn't work because one of the novel's themes is Identity. What is Self in this world of Altered Carbon, where the flesh is nothing. There's a lot of exposition in the way the author uses First Person Narrative but I found it necessary to move the story along and introduce the world. It's a delicate balancing act between info dump and story.
Carla Patterson It's hard for me to imagine not liking Kovacs... he is one of my all-time favorite characters in all of fiction, not just science fiction. When I ride along with Kovacs (in his head as he thinks, feels, acts, reacts), I feel amazing kinship. I have not been a soldier but I have lived a life without the blinders on. To live in this world, as it really is, one becomes an amalgam of situational strategies and complex, if not mixed, feelings. Because Kovacs can inhabit different bodies, he sees life from a perspective much closer to mine than most first person narrators. I grew up mixed race and female in a society where none of that was welcome. I can't turn off the reality of what that means and it's the fact that his breadth of knowledge of what it's like to be different genders, different races, different body types, etc, not to mention what it's like to be in limbo at someone else's whim, that speaks to me so deeply and personally. He has a certain combination of fatalism and optimism which I really like as well. He's been through it all but still wants to live, love, experience new things, etcetera. But, when they go south on him, he has tools with which to survive it. Other people have touched on various other aspects of his being the first person narrator so I won't go into those.
Suzan despite all the answers below, I didn't like him either
Ed Rush I don't think third-person would have helped much.
Scott Sancetta I don't know if I "liked" the character, but halfway through, I found I didn't care enough about him to keep reading. (I did finish it, I did enjoy it).
It's interesting how the author chose to either 'soften' Kovacs, or to reveal more of his warm fuzzy side, as we progress through the 2nd half. Maybe that works because we readers like to see characters grow or deepen.
Adrian I really had a hard time with the first person too. Probably also because I didn't like Kovacs very much... I now have "pinkeyes" because I must have rolled my eyes at every dialogue found in this book.
[Name Redacted] That's a common feature of noir, but it's always a crap-shoot. Like the narrator? Well, then, strap yourself in and have a good time! Don't like the narrator? Well, then, you're screwed. I gave up on this because of how little I cared about...er...well...any of the characters. I have better things to do with my time.
Jeno Lapua
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Clay Hard disagree. The author nails his target, and that's first-person noir antihero (arguably with a heart of gold). There are so many ways that this book is not for everyone, but if you don't care for that form, you ain't gonna like it.
Rosemary yes i did also wpuld have enjoyed it in the 3rd person narration
Image for Altered Carbon
Rate this book
Clear rating

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more