Giles Hotchkiss, another New York Republican, offered a substantive criticism of Bingham’s formulation. The language left too much to the “caprice of Congress,” Hotchkiss argued. “We may pass laws here to-day, and the next Congress may wipe them out. Where is your guarantee then?” Instead, Hotchkiss suggested, “Why not provide that no State shall discriminate against any class of its citizens … [?]” An explicit limit on the states would ensure that, unlike in Bingham’s initial proposal, the amendment would not become meaningless if “rebels” and “their northern sympathizers” took charge of
...more

