Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters
Rate it:
Open Preview
21%
Flag icon
Formal versus Ecological Rationality
22%
Flag icon
Philosophy professors who present students with contrived thought experiments, like whether it is permissible to throw a fat man over a bridge to stop a runaway trolley which threatens five workers on the track, often get frustrated when students look for loopholes, like shouting at the workers to get out of the way. Yet that is exactly the rational thing one would do in real life.
22%
Flag icon
Classical versus Family Resemblance Categories
22%
Flag icon
A third reason that rationality will never be reduced to logic
22%
Flag icon
Logical Computation versus Pattern Association
23%
Flag icon
“hidden” layer of neurons between the input and the output, as shown on the next page. This changes the network from a stimulus-response
23%
Flag icon
creature to one with internal representations—concepts,
23%
Flag icon
The networks are called deep learning systems because of the number of layers between the input and the output
23%
Flag icon
Human rationality is a hybrid system.
24%
Flag icon
time and chance happen to them all. An essential part of rationality is dealing with randomness in our lives and uncertainty in our knowledge.
24%
Flag icon
“random” in common parlance refers to two concepts: a lack of patterning in data, and a lack of predictability in a process.
24%
Flag icon
Brevity is the soul of pattern: we say that a dataset is nonrandom when its shortest possible description is shorter than the dataset itself.
24%
Flag icon
This credence estimate is sometimes called the Bayesian interpretation of probability
24%
Flag icon
frequentist
25%
Flag icon
availability heuristic.
25%
Flag icon
data came to be considered a public good.
25%
Flag icon
it. We
26%
Flag icon
implemented billions of dollars of dubious safety measures, like installing bulletproof
26%
Flag icon
communal outrage
26%
Flag icon
victim narrative: a moralized allegory in which a harmful act is sanctified, the damage consecrated
26%
Flag icon
The goal of the narrative is not accuracy but solidarity.
27%
Flag icon
People avidly consume data in the weather, business, and sports pages, so why not the news?
27%
Flag icon
crib deaths within a family are not independent,
28%
Flag icon
conditional probability:
28%
Flag icon
prob(A | B).
28%
Flag icon
Boy or Girl paradox. People tend to say .5; the correct answer is .33.
29%
Flag icon
“Did you see that poor disabled guy?
29%
Flag icon
“Yeah, but his tailor is a genius—the suit fits him perfectly!”
30%
Flag icon
The psychoanalyst Carl Jung proposed a mystical force called synchronicity to explain the quintessential thing that needs no explanation, the prevalence of coincidence in the world.
30%
Flag icon
post hoc hanky-panky.
30%
Flag icon
the cluster illusion.
30%
Flag icon
if 23 people are in a room, the chances that two will share a birthday are better than even. With 57 in the room, the odds rise to 99 percent.
30%
Flag icon
When a series of plagues is visited upon us, it does not mean there is a God who is punishing us for our sins or testing our faith. It means there is not a God who is spacing them apart.
30%
Flag icon
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
30%
Flag icon
“Rationality Community,”
31%
Flag icon
Suppose that the prevalence of breast cancer in the population of women is 1 percent. Suppose that the sensitivity of a breast cancer test (its true-positive rate) is 90 percent. Suppose that its false-positive rate is 9 percent. A woman tests positive. What is the chance that she has the disease? The most popular answer from a sample of doctors given these numbers ranged from 80 to 90 percent.3 Bayes’s rule allows you to calculate the correct answer: 9 percent.
31%
Flag icon
31%
Flag icon
posterior probability:
31%
Flag icon
prior probability
31%
Flag icon
likelihood.
31%
Flag icon
commonness or ordinariness of the data.
31%
Flag icon
32%
Flag icon
she is representative of an art history major, and the stereotype crowds out the base rates.
32%
Flag icon
Bayesian updating.
32%
Flag icon
It’s simply the mindset of someone who wasn’t born yesterday.
32%
Flag icon
The reason these studies were sitting ducks for the replicability snipers is that they had low Bayesian priors. Not as low as ESP, to be sure, but it would be an extraordinary discovery if mood and behavior could be easily pushed around by trivial manipulations of the environment.
33%
Flag icon
The problem is that “surprising” is a synonym for “low prior probability,”
33%
Flag icon
Forbidding the use of ethnic, sexual, racial, or religious base rates is a public commitment to equality and fairness
33%
Flag icon
failure to think clearly about base rates—to lay out when there are good reasons for forbidding them and when there are not.
33%
Flag icon
The problem is: which base rate?