Data Analysis for Continuous School Improvement
Rate it:
Kindle Notes & Highlights
11%
Flag icon
absent,
11%
Flag icon
pro...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
11%
Flag icon
Class sizes, number of years of teacher experience by grade level, number of students in special education programs, by gender and ethnicity, and the subgroups of students enrolled in differ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
12%
Flag icon
pick a point in time (census) to gather demographic data elements and then include at least three years of information to show a trend.
13%
Flag icon
strengths, challenges, implications for the continuous school improvement plan, and identify other data they wished they had.
13%
Flag icon
By using “challenges” to replace “weaknesses,” staff are able to address real school challenges.
13%
Flag icon
Implications are placeholders until all the data are analyzed.
13%
Flag icon
constructive responses to challenges.
14%
Flag icon
consolidated implications for demographics, perceptions, student learning, and school processes.
14%
Flag icon
some data, such as attendance and behavior, that require staff to look across months and weeks to understand them.
14%
Flag icon
subgroupings of achievement or perceptions measures allow us to isolate variations among different student groups to understand if all students are achieving or experiencing school in the same way, and to know if there is something the adults need to learn about particular student groups to better meet their needs.
14%
Flag icon
Disaggregation helps us find student groups that are not responding to our processes in the way others are—enabling us to understand why and to search for new processes so every student learns.
14%
Flag icon
student achievement, perceptions, and school process data by demographic variables
14%
Flag icon
use 40 as a minimal group size they believe will lead to reliable results.
41%
Flag icon
get appropriate data
41%
Flag icon
structures for teachers to collaborate
41%
Flag icon
leadership to hold the process and people accountable.
41%
Flag icon
what students know and do not know
41%
Flag icon
how students are learning;
41%
Flag icon
how teachers are teaching;
41%
Flag icon
what teachers need to do ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
41%
Flag icon
who is getting different (bett...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
41%
Flag icon
If formative assessments are not aligned to learning standards, there will be a problem.
41%
Flag icon
Teachers need support in getting real-time formative data to review in a timely fashion.
41%
Flag icon
Data Leadership Team
42%
Flag icon
Supporting and facilitating dialogue
42%
Flag icon
data are available
42%
Flag icon
teacher ownership of the data
42%
Flag icon
exploration of current processes,
42%
Flag icon
implementation, monitoring, and follow-through of next steps.
42%
Flag icon
data tools
42%
Flag icon
appropriate reports and graphs are available in a timely fashion
42%
Flag icon
re-roster or reorganize student achievement results
42%
Flag icon
data in perspective to other data,
42%
Flag icon
longitudinal reports of individual students, for each teacher, for grade levels, and for the school
42%
Flag icon
planning a work calendar
42%
Flag icon
understand the purpose of the team
42%
Flag icon
meeting norms.
42%
Flag icon
conditions for trust.
42%
Flag icon
challenging questions.
42%
Flag icon
participate in the meetings.
42%
Flag icon
Use time well
42%
Flag icon
make instructional decisions based on data
42%
Flag icon
analyze the data,
42%
Flag icon
which instructional strategies need to be improved.
42%
Flag icon
target their instruction
42%
Flag icon
implementation of instructional strategies
42%
Flag icon
Monitor and measure
42%
Flag icon
use of protocols
42%
Flag icon
Prepare questions