In the same way, beaming light on the unseen is costly in both computational and mental effort.
I've found that when another person forms an opinion based on a A MULTIPLICITY of HEADLINES, it's impossible to get them to READ THE TEXT. Everytime I point out what the article said, or why it's OBVIOUSLY FALSE, they change the subject.
THERE IS NO POINT IN DEBATING A HEADLINER. THEY DON'T DIG.

