Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between November 16, 2017 - March 19, 2018
3%
Flag icon
Most mammals emerge from the womb like glazed earthenware emerging from a kiln – any attempt at remoulding will scratch or break them. Humans emerge from the womb like molten glass from a furnace. They can be spun, stretched and shaped with a surprising degree of freedom. This is why today we can educate our children to become Christian or Buddhist, capitalist or socialist, warlike or peace-loving.
6%
Flag icon
And if you spend hours praying to non-existing guardian spirits, aren’t you wasting precious time, time better spent foraging, fighting and fornicating?
6%
Flag icon
Sapiens can cooperate in extremely flexible ways with countless numbers of strangers. That’s why Sapiens rule the world, whereas ants eat our leftovers and chimps are locked up in zoos and research laboratories.
7%
Flag icon
The secret was probably the appearance of fiction. Large numbers of strangers can cooperate successfully by believing in common myths.
8%
Flag icon
Unlike lying, an imagined reality is something that everyone believes in, and as long as this communal belief persists, the imagined reality exerts force in the world.
34%
Flag icon
Gender is a race in which some of the runners compete only for the bronze medal.
36%
Flag icon
This network of artificial instincts is called culture’.
38%
Flag icon
Homo sapiens evolved to think of people as divided into us and them. ‘Us’ was the group immediately around you, whoever you were, and ‘them’
42%
Flag icon
If they run out of coins, we run out of trust.
42%
Flag icon
But there is no justice in history.
42%
Flag icon
It should be stressed that an empire is defined solely by its cultural diversity and flexible borders,
44%
Flag icon
Many Americans nowadays maintain that their government has a moral imperative to bring Third World countries the benefits of democracy and human rights, even if these goods are delivered by cruise missiles and F-16s.
45%
Flag icon
to believe in the Christian God that the empire had adopted from one of its Levantine provinces,
47%
Flag icon
Religion can thus be defined as a system of human norms and values that is founded on a belief in a superhuman order.
47%
Flag icon
2. Based on this superhuman order, religion establishes norms and values that it considers binding.
47%
Flag icon
First, it must espouse a universal superhuman order that is true always and everywhere.
47%
Flag icon
Second, it must insist on spreading this belief
47%
Flag icon
it must be universal and ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
47%
Flag icon
Hence the first religious effect of the Agricultural Revolution was to turn plants and animals from equal members of a spiritual round table into property.
47%
Flag icon
Polytheists, on the other hand, increasingly saw the world as a reflection of the relationship between gods and humans.
48%
Flag icon
Polytheism is inherently open-minded, and rarely persecutes ‘heretics’ and ‘infidels’.
48%
Flag icon
Subject peoples throughout the empire were expected to respect the empire’s gods and rituals, since these gods and rituals protected and legitimised the empire. Yet they were not required to give up their local gods and rituals. In
48%
Flag icon
Still, if we combine all the victims of all these persecutions, it turns out that in these three centuries, the polytheistic Romans killed no more than a few thousand Christians.1 In contrast, over the course of the next 1,500 years, Christians slaughtered Christians by the millions to defend slightly different interpretations of the religion of love and compassion.
48%
Flag icon
Polytheism continued to give birth here and there to other monotheist religions, but they remained marginal, not least because they failed to digest their own universal message.
49%
Flag icon
The monotheist religions expelled the gods through the front door with a lot of fanfare, only to take them back in through the side window.
49%
Flag icon
Monotheists have to practise intellectual gymnastics to explain how an all-knowing, all-powerful and perfectly good God allows so much suffering in the world.
49%
Flag icon
There is one logical way of solving the riddle: to argue that there is a single omnipotent God who created the entire universe – and He’s evil. But nobody in history has had the stomach for such a belief.
50%
Flag icon
So such oppositions eventually became cornerstones of Christian and Muslim thought. Belief in heaven (the realm of the good god) and hell (the realm of the evil god) was also dualist in origin. There is no trace of this belief in the Old Testament, which also never claims that the souls of people continue to live after the death of the body.
53%
Flag icon
Yet over the last 200 years, the life sciences have thoroughly undermined this belief. Scientists studying the inner workings of the human organism have found no soul there. They
54%
Flag icon
We study history not to know the future but to widen our horizons, to understand that our present situation is neither natural nor inevitable, and that we consequently have many more possibilities before us than we imagine.
54%
Flag icon
A cultural idea – such as belief in Christian heaven above the clouds or Communist paradise here on earth – can compel a human to dedicate his or her life to spreading that idea, even at the price of death.
56%
Flag icon
Premodern traditions of knowledge such as Islam, Christianity, Buddhism and Confucianism asserted that everything that is important to know about the world was already known.
57%
Flag icon
A new branch of mathematics was developed over the last 200 years to deal with the more complex aspects of reality: statistics.
85%
Flag icon
Family and community seem to have more impact on our happiness than money and health. People with strong families who live in tight-knit and supportive communities are significantly happier than people whose families are dysfunctional and who have never found (or never sought) a community to be part of. Marriage is particularly important.
86%
Flag icon
Repeated studies have found that there is a very close correlation between good marriages and high subjective well-being, and between bad marriages and misery.
86%
Flag icon
But the most important finding of all is that happiness does not really depend on objective conditions of either wealth, health or even community. Rather, it depends on the correlation between objective conditions and subjective expectations.
86%
Flag icon
being satisfied with what you already have is far more important than getting more of what you want.