When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
53%
Flag icon
the goal to be pursued by affirmative action cannot be vague or only of moderate importance; it must be sufficiently valuable as a social good to justify suspending rules that ordinarily must be blind to race.
54%
Flag icon
Such high-mindedness is too abstract and too removed from the country’s historical record.
54%
Flag icon
after several hundred years of class-based discrimination against Negroes, the Court is unwilling to hold that a class-based remedy for that discrimination is permissible.”
54%
Flag icon
it was impossible to “ignore the remarkable and unique separation between blacks and others” that continues in American life.
54%
Flag icon
“Negro poverty is not white poverty,”
55%
Flag icon
the purpose of affirmative action is to put a definitive end to the caste status of blacks in American life and thus also put an end to white privilege,
55%
Flag icon
It would be callous to ignore the tremendous and devastating impact of racism on American life.
55%
Flag icon
“not only to end discrimination,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has argued, “but also to counteract discrimination’s lingering effects.”
55%
Flag icon
Every violation of color-blind norms, in short, must be justified with the goal of a just color-blind society in mind.
55%
Flag icon
strict scrutiny appropriately sets the bar high, but not beyond reach.
55%
Flag icon
affirmative action to achieve educational diversity was permissible because it addressed the specific situation created by the historical pattern of nearly all-white higher education.
56%
Flag icon
The usual sole focus on present imbalances produces claims for racial rectification without offering enough historical justification to bring its benefits to most African Americans.
57%
Flag icon
the results that can be traced directly to public policy here were profound and long-lasting. Missed chances at homeownership obviously compound over time.
57%
Flag icon
Over time, it is much harder to make up gaps in wealth than in income.
57%
Flag icon
reversal of this income convergence
57%
Flag icon
the hallmark social policy innovations of the New Deal and the Fair Deal themselves operated more as brakes than as accelerators in incorporating African Americans into the country’s rapidly expanding postwar middle class.
57%
Flag icon
The old advantages and disadvantages have continued to compound.57
58%
Flag icon
The Far East Command established such a program, aimed principally at blacks, to bring every soldier to a fifth-grade standard.
58%
Flag icon
“Command spokesmen quite openly justified the disparity on the grounds that Negroes on the whole had received fewer educational opportunities in the United States.”
59%
Flag icon
Under affirmative action, they are compensated not for being black but only because they were subject to unfair treatment at an earlier moment because they were black.
59%
Flag icon
authorize a major assault on inequality and poverty which would be justified by these historical patterns and remedied by interventions offering boosts into middle-class status.
59%
Flag icon
The programs discussed in this book did far more than cost people money or opportunity.
59%
Flag icon
Extend affirmative action in order to end it within one generation.
1 3 Next »