The Case for Easter: A Journalist Investigates Evidence for the Resurrection
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
9%
Flag icon
As the nineteenth century dawned, Karl Bahrdt, Karl Venturini, and others tried to explain away the resurrection by suggesting that Jesus only fainted from exhaustion on the cross, or he had been given a drug that made him appear to die, and that he had later been revived by the cool, damp air of the tomb.3
Megan
That's insane. Anyone who knows how cruxifiction works knows that you don't survive it.
10%
Flag icon
Conspiracy theorists bolstered this hypothesis by pointing out that Jesus had been given some liquid on a sponge while on the cross (Mark 15:36)
Megan
It was vinegar and He refused to drink it.
17%
Flag icon
But how certain was death by this crude, slow, and rather inexact form of execution called crucifixion? In fact, most people aren’t sure how the cross kills its victims.
Megan
Suffocation. Slow, agonzing suffocation.
52%
Flag icon
Craig’s explanation, however, left yet another question lingering: Why were the women going to anoint the body of Jesus if they already knew that his tomb was securely sealed? “Do their actions really make sense?” I asked. Craig thought for a moment before he answered—this time not in his debater’s voice but in a more tender tone. “Lee, I strongly feel that scholars who have not known the love and devotion that these women felt for Jesus have no right to pronounce cool judgments upon the feasibility of what they wanted to do. “For people who are grieving, who have lost someone they desperately ...more
Megan
They were determined to honor someone they loved, rock or no rock. End of story.