Best Books of the Decade: 2010's

1

by
4.25 avg rating — 2,807,714 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
2

by
4.22 avg rating — 2,441,532 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
3

by
4.03 avg rating — 1,982,382 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
4

by
4.05 avg rating — 1,799,440 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
5

by
4.40 avg rating — 602,677 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
6

by
4.33 avg rating — 563,623 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
7

by
4.32 avg rating — 684,019 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
8

by
4.29 avg rating — 609,383 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
9

by
4.15 avg rating — 532,191 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
10

by
4.27 avg rating — 841,949 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
11

by
4.04 avg rating — 524,120 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
12

by
4.35 avg rating — 524,553 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
13

by
4.14 avg rating — 644,767 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
14

by
4.23 avg rating — 406,516 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
15

by
4.32 avg rating — 462,888 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
16

by
4.06 avg rating — 1,003,884 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
17

by
4.10 avg rating — 673,464 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
18

by
3.90 avg rating — 778,670 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
19

by
4.04 avg rating — 605,855 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
20

by
4.45 avg rating — 370,878 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
21

by
4.59 avg rating — 271,785 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
22

by
3.90 avg rating — 1,510,163 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
23

by
4.30 avg rating — 336,858 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
24

by
4.58 avg rating — 322,070 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
25

by
4.45 avg rating — 514,379 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
26

by
3.89 avg rating — 526,431 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
27

by
4.30 avg rating — 355,105 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
28

by
4.15 avg rating — 404,168 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
29

by
4.18 avg rating — 351,883 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
30

by
4.44 avg rating — 344,225 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
31

by
4.38 avg rating — 602,321 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
32

by
4.46 avg rating — 362,558 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
33

by
3.63 avg rating — 709,600 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
34

by
4.10 avg rating — 436,751 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
35

by
4.70 avg rating — 184,271 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
36

by
3.99 avg rating — 380,024 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
37

by
4.55 avg rating — 199,843 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
38

by
4.07 avg rating — 379,323 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
39

by
4.55 avg rating — 421,526 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
40

by
4.46 avg rating — 210,466 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
41

by
4.05 avg rating — 462,479 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
42

by
4.47 avg rating — 228,372 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
43

by
4.03 avg rating — 256,656 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
44

by
4.65 avg rating — 199,721 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
45

by
4.30 avg rating — 242,155 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
46

by
4.28 avg rating — 264,015 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
47

by
3.99 avg rating — 225,971 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
48

by
3.99 avg rating — 377,309 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
49

by
3.67 avg rating — 571,883 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
50

by
4.04 avg rating — 250,453 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
51

by
4.42 avg rating — 146,594 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
52

by
4.04 avg rating — 317,128 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
53

by
3.90 avg rating — 156,180 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
54

by
4.48 avg rating — 225,150 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
55

by
4.41 avg rating — 235,470 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
56

by
4.01 avg rating — 348,464 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
57

by
3.95 avg rating — 687,065 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
58

by
4.01 avg rating — 328,455 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
59

by
4.05 avg rating — 245,752 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
60

by
4.08 avg rating — 326,057 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
61

by
3.75 avg rating — 169,978 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
62

by
4.27 avg rating — 212,454 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
63

by
4.35 avg rating — 155,346 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
64

by
4.36 avg rating — 243,310 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
65

by
3.91 avg rating — 259,283 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
66

by
3.90 avg rating — 303,989 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
67

by
3.85 avg rating — 386,356 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
68

by
4.07 avg rating — 266,030 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
69

by
4.06 avg rating — 191,254 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
70

by
4.37 avg rating — 117,332 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
71

by
3.82 avg rating — 385,421 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
72

by
4.77 avg rating — 134,514 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
73

by
3.29 avg rating — 270,469 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
74

by
4.08 avg rating — 138,236 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
75

by
4.46 avg rating — 153,871 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
76

by
3.99 avg rating — 271,096 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
77

by
4.03 avg rating — 223,490 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
78

by
3.65 avg rating — 152,333 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
79

by
4.35 avg rating — 350,294 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
80

by
3.71 avg rating — 124,948 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
81

by
3.88 avg rating — 236,351 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
82

by
4.52 avg rating — 178,644 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
83

by
4.21 avg rating — 133,219 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
84

by
4.06 avg rating — 245,694 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
85

by
4.21 avg rating — 153,492 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
86

by
4.09 avg rating — 286,974 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
87

by
3.91 avg rating — 170,667 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
88

by
4.27 avg rating — 55,387 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
89

by
4.15 avg rating — 218,456 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
90

by
4.26 avg rating — 79,103 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
91

by
4.06 avg rating — 200,219 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
92

by
4.04 avg rating — 156,351 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
93

by
3.77 avg rating — 105,325 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
94

by
4.59 avg rating — 147,866 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
95

by
3.74 avg rating — 137,466 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
96

by
4.28 avg rating — 166,409 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
97

by
3.86 avg rating — 146,111 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
98

by
3.99 avg rating — 94,199 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
99

by
4.31 avg rating — 100,008 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
100

by
3.82 avg rating — 132,619 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
flag this list (?)
5,948 books · 11,071 voters · list created January 14th, 2010 by deleted user.
896 likes · 
Lists are re-scored approximately every 5 minutes.


April 7921 books
2216 friends
Leah 1554 books
25 friends
Ross 317 books
16 friends
Ahem! 610 books
1 friend
Steven 27 books
237 friends
Nicole 19 books
3 friends
amanda 304 books
11 friends
Nicolle 1066 books
454 friends

More voters…


Comments (showing 1-50 of 103) (103 new)


message 1: by Bettie☯ (new)

Bettie☯ Tacky enough to put your own book on this particular list but to do it twice!? lol

Good luck with the promotion.


message 2: by Breanne (new)

Breanne Tiger saga all the way :)


message 3: by Ðɑηηɑ (new)

Ðɑηηɑ ...Voted only by teens.


message 4: by Alexandra (new)

Alexandra Danna: Sadly yes :/


message 5: by Phillip (new)

Phillip Edwards There are plenty of grown-up books on the list, they just aren't on page one at the moment because not enough grown-ups have voted. It would only take a few more grown-up voters to transform it into something more widely representative...


message 6: by Ben (last edited Aug 26, 2012 11:00AM) (new)

Ben Phillip wrote: "There are plenty of grown-up books on the list, they just aren't on page one at the moment because not enough grown-ups have voted. It would only take a few more grown-up voters to transform it int..."

And...... it's better. Lots of literary fiction, history books, etc. now on Page One.


Themis-Athena (Lioness at Large) Well -- I wouldn't say "lots" yet, but yes, better than before at any rate ...


message 8: by Joje (new)

Joje There are plenty of years to go here. What about works not in English, translated or not?


Themis-Athena (Lioness at Large) Joje wrote: "What about works not in English, translated or not?"

I think all that matters is the period of publication, not language ... at least that's the way it works on the other "best books of the decade" lists!


message 10: by Ðɑηηɑ (new)

Ðɑηηɑ In 100 years, people are going to think we were shape-shifting-paranormal-obssessed teenagers.


message 11: by Ðɑηηɑ (new)

Ðɑηηɑ Mockingjay is an awful book!


message 12: by Dora (new)

Dora I've just added a history book that came out last year.


message 13: by Thania (new)

Thania H. Perhaps there are a little too much young adult books on this list, but other than that, it's a okay list for the decade so far.


message 14: by Laura (new)

Laura is it just me or are there an awful lot of books from book series? :)


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads That's a real trend, series.


message 16: by Conner (new)

Conner This list really shows how far literature has fallen in the past few years. This is more like a top list of preteen books.


message 17: by Emily Ann (last edited Jul 18, 2014 10:39AM) (new)

Emily Ann I just can't understand how some of these books got on here.


message 18: by Ðɑηηɑ (new)

Ðɑηηɑ Emily Ann wrote: "I just can't understand how some of these books got on here."

Yes! Most of the books here are utter and complete crap.


message 19: by Andrew (new)

Andrew I think there's fewer adult books that have huge followings; there's no Harry Potters, Hunger Games, etc. in the contemporary adult literary world.


message 20: by Jean (new)

Jean Agenbroad Thania wrote: "Perhaps there are a little too much young adult books on this list, but other than that, it's a okay list for the decade so far."

Laura wrote: "is it just me or are there an awful lot of books from book series? :)"


message 21: by Jean (new)

Jean Agenbroad Couldn’t agree more. I finally got bored with this because too much of it was “teeny” or “list"


message 22: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Added links to the 'best-of-decade' lists for the 19th century.


message 23: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: none found.


message 24: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 1 removed.


message 25: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 1 removed.


message 26: by Mitchell (new)

Mitchell Strongly suggest a minimum number of ratings for this list of 1000.


message 27: by Ellinor (new)

Ellinor Mitchell wrote: "Strongly suggest a minimum number of ratings for this list of 1000."

I totally agree with you there. It doesn't solve the YA problem, but most definitely would solve the spam problem.


message 28: by Donna (new)

Donna Davis Found & removed one duplicate.

I think the quality of the list will improve as the decade continues. I had to knock at least 10 off the bottom of my own list in order to add some really strong ARCs I read recently. The more we read, the higher our standards will have to be, since we only get 100 votes.


message 29: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 3 books removed.


message 30: by Jason (last edited Jan 09, 2015 09:25AM) (new)

Jason I've read at least 1 book from each author in the T50.

A largely uninspiring lot.

I agree with Mitchell. I always side-eye books that have more votes on lists than they have actual ratings...or books that are even close to even on that count.


message 31: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 6 books removed.


message 32: by Donna (last edited Jan 13, 2015 10:54AM) (new)

Donna Davis It's always inspirational to sit down with a nice cup of coffee, get onto my favorite book site, and read a bunch of comments written by people who have nothing nice to say. Cheers, all.

Librarians (on staff): it is true (by my count and right now) that 3 books in the top 100 have, by a small margin, more points than should be possible. Can this be explained by people leaving during the whole amazon purchase uproar? In other words, if someone leaves the site and clears all their reviews (or not), does their score still turn up on listopia without counting them as a "person"? If that's not the reason, then what can we do to rectify the problem?

As for the grumps out there, if you don't like the books listed, add some that were first published in 2010 or later that you do like. I found 99 to either vote for or add. What can you do to improve things?


message 33: by Susanna - Censored by GoodReads (last edited Jan 13, 2015 11:17AM) (new)

Susanna - Censored by GoodReads To my best knowledge, when a person goes, their listopia votes go as well?

ETA: To add to Donna's statement: it's easy to add books to lists. At the top of the list, at the tab next to "all votes."


message 34: by Mitchell (new)

Mitchell Susanna - Censored by GoodReads wrote: "To my best knowledge, when a person goes, their listopia votes go as well?"

that is my understanding as well - which is another reason why that 100 vote limit is so irritating. You really need at least two votes per book to maintain a list.


message 35: by Donna (new)

Donna Davis Mitchell wrote: "Susanna - Censored by GoodReads wrote: "To my best knowledge, when a person goes, their listopia votes go as well?"

that is my understanding as well - which is another reason why that 100 vote lim..."

Then I am completely mystified. Is it a bug? How does any book receive more votes than it has voters? Even if all of the voters who voted chose the book as their #1 pick, there are 3 books in the first 100 which should not be able to have that many votes.

That said, I still enjoy the list and will be happy to maintain it, to the extent that a volunteer librarian can.


message 36: by Mitchell (new)

Mitchell Donna wrote: "Mitchell wrote: "Susanna - Censored by GoodReads wrote: "To my best knowledge, when a person goes, their listopia votes go as well?"

that is my understanding as well - which is another reason why ..."


can you point to a specific book, I am not following which issue you are talking about.


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads Because you don't need to have read a book to vote for it. (Which is good on "these are the books we're most anticipating" lists.)


message 38: by Donna (new)

Donna Davis *moan* Oh, I see. I always thought we were supposed to read them first, and that the "anticipating" lists were really just people voting on amazing ARC's.

The last time I felt like this was when I found out there was no Santa Claus.


message 39: by Mitchell (new)

Mitchell since this list is now owned by "deleted user", did we arbitrarily want to add a minimum number of ratings - say to 1000 - like the sf list

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/4...


message 40: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 10 books removed.


message 41: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 7 books removed.


message 42: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes It's a sensible suggestion, but it's probably too late now, because of the amount of work necessary to weed out books with fewer ratings than whatever number has been decided on. Such a rule would have to be implemented from the beginning for the editor to stay on top of it.

There is another problem: books with the same rank in this list have wildly different numbers of ratings. for example, at the moment three books, all ranked #2002, each voted for by one person, each with 18 points, have 318, 3526 and 1147 ratings respectively. It isn't clear what a smaller number of ratings has to do with a book's quality: it's only a reflection of popularity. This is an awkward fact for a list that is trying to identify the best books.

If popularity and quality were the same thing, Goodreads would be able to compile the list themselves automatically by generating a list of all books published in the period in question in order of number of ratings.

It's a fault of all Goodreads lists that there is very little control over who can add what to any given list. Many contributors simply ignore any stipulations in the list description so that they can vote for their favourites. Easily added, these books are then very time-consuming to identify and remove: so the lists very quickly become choked with books with very low numbers of votes and ratings, as here.


message 43: by Mitchell (last edited Feb 27, 2015 09:21AM) (new)

Mitchell Paul wrote: "It's a sensible suggestion, but it's probably too late now, because of the amount of work necessary to weed out books with fewer ratings than whatever number has been decided on. Such a rule would ..."

It's definitely not too late - there are enough librarians to semi-enforce it. A minimum rating especially for recent books cuts down on listopia spam by non-readers. Sure it under counts awesome books that no one has heard of. And for books from the pre-goodreads period a minimum rating really isn't necessary.

but compare
Best Fantasy Books of the 21st Century
to
Best Science Fiction of the 21st Century

The fantasy list has no ratings minimum, 5341 voters and 1471 books
The sf list has a 1000 rating minimum, 3191 voters and 375 books

I think the sf list is a higher quality list, doing a better job of capturing what books in their genre is actually good. And it is easier to maintain.


message 44: by Donna (new)

Donna Davis I object to adding a minimum number of ratings. Listopia is a democratic way that readers can promote brand new books that are excellent. I say this as a frequent (but unpaid) reader of ARCs, and since authors have been known to work the system, I will also volunteer the information that I have zero books published, and zero books in the hopper. My objection is strictly as a reader who likes to promote strong new literature.


message 45: by Mitchell (last edited Feb 27, 2015 02:15PM) (new)

Mitchell Donna wrote: "I object to adding a minimum number of ratings. Listopia is a democratic way that readers can promote brand new books that are excellent. I say this as a frequent (but unpaid) reader of ARCs, and s..."

All I can say to that is goodreads has seemingly defended the right of a list creator to specify an arbitrary minimum and for librarians to defend that criteria.

I think that Best Fantasy on Goodreads with less than 100 ratings actually satisfies the case you have, at least for fantasy fairly well.


message 46: by Donna (new)

Donna Davis Mitchell wrote: "Donna wrote: "I object to adding a minimum number of ratings. Listopia is a democratic way that readers can promote brand new books that are excellent. I say this as a frequent (but unpaid) reader ..."
I don't know where you came up with the idea that fantasy ratings of fewer than 100 would substitute for the right to vote for a best book of the decade! It's not what the list's creator designated, and I don't like the notion that some Goodreads staff might arbitrarily make the change after the fact. I suspect a lot of my own votes would be suddenly nil. In fact, I will pull all my own votes off in protest if this is done, and I will certainly not use my volunteer librarian capacity to enforce it. I've done a lot of volunteer work for listopia because it is one way that readers can have their voices heard, but since amazon bought this site, I have noticed more and more constraints on the lists that make them more closed-off. It doesn't bode well for free speech.


message 47: by Paul (new)

Paul Bowes Checked for duplicates: 5 books removed.


message 48: by Cindy (new)

Cindy M/Ðɑηηɑ wrote: "...Voted only by teens."

M/Ðɑηηɑ wrote: "...Voted only by teens."
Thanx, I'm 35 :)


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads Whipper-snapper! I'm pushing 50.


message 50: by Donna (new)

Donna Davis Susanna - Censored by GoodReads wrote: "Whipper-snapper! I'm pushing 50."
...and I'm past it. Well into my rear-view!


« previous 1 3
back to top