Children's Books I'll Re-Read No Matter How Old I Am
Kids' books that stand the test of time and are enjoyable even as an adult.
Comments Showing 1-50 of 59 (59 new)
message 1:
by
A.C.
(new)
Jan 11, 2012 11:47PM

reply
|
flag

'Tom's Midnight Garden' by Philippa Pearce.
These should definitely be on the list!


I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book.

I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book."
I also wondered about Night. A classic certainly, but hardly suitable for children, I would think.

Let's see if the list creator chimes in, librarians can remove them, but we have to be careful that they truly don't suit the list or lose librarian status.
Misfit wrote: "Richard wrote: "Jane Eyre is a children's classic?"
I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book."
Jane Eyre is a definite "no", but people tend to put the Hobbit on Kids' Classics lists all the time. I think Tolkien wrote it with a younger audience in mind.
I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book."
Jane Eyre is a definite "no", but people tend to put the Hobbit on Kids' Classics lists all the time. I think Tolkien wrote it with a younger audience in mind.




Re CS Lewis and Roald Dahl, I totally agree - you're never too big for them :-) . I used to absolutely devour Dahl's books as a child, so much so that the few copies that I have of his work look like survivors of some horrific book-attack. Which I suppose they are.
I muuuuust remember to add some more timeless books to this fantastic list.

Re CS Lewis and Roald Dahl, I totally agree - you're never too big for them :-) . I used to absolutely devour Dahl's books as a child, so much so that the few copies..."

Gabriel, what sorts of things do you think they should NOT be reading? I looked up Where the Red Fern Grows and I think it would have upset me deeply as a child. I read Jane Eyre at age eight and liked it. (Don't know what this proves ...)

Lol... a lot of what I read! For example, Roald Dahl is (was) absolutely brilliant, but so terribly utterly macabre. Children being flung over fences, turned into mice, neglected... downright disturbing. Although, perhaps that is just an adult mindset, to think that children would be disturbed by this or that, since really, when I read his books as a child, I was not disturbed at all (that I remember), just wonderfully amused. Only now do I stop and think, "Gosh, I'm almost certain that I should have been disturbed by reading that."
Still, I don't think I would bring myself to give a child a Roald Dahl book now. I know, I know, Hypocritical. Maybe I'll go and re-read my Roald Dahl collection to see if I change my mind.
Your comment also prompted me to look up Where the Red Fern Grows, and I don't know if I would have been disturbed, but it doesn't look very enjoyable.

The same goes for To kill a mocking bird by Harper Lee (no. 145 at the moment) or Gone with the wind by Margaret Mitchell (no. 230), or Anna Karenina by Tolstoi (no. 334), or Shakespeare's Sonnets (no. 376), or Hamlet (no. 386) and so on and so forth...
Some people obviously made a mess of this Listopia, which is a shame, really.

Somebody was looking for the list police? We have the Police Chief in the house!
I'm going to put myself to shame now - I've rarely looked at a list past page 1! Someone please tell me I'm not the only one...

Well, what shall I say... Whenever I vote on a Listopia, I tend to go through all the pages to find the books I've read and add some as well, maybe. And as I've read the above mentioned books, they showed up on the list and as such weren't hard to find for me. I still think it is a great list but it is a shame some people made such a mess of it.


Re-readable by us, certainly, but they express some very questionable attitudes if they are to be recommended to children nowadays. For example, people whose eyes are close together are untrustworthy; foreigners are suspect; deaf people are funny; black skin (gollywogs) indicates criminality. They're good yarns, but ...

It is a lovely book which enthralled me from the beginning.

I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book."
I also wondered about Night. A classic ce..."
You're right, Richard. I wondered about those as well. Hardly children's reading.

I can only say: I'm glad I'm not the only one who seems to have problems with some of the books on this list..

I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book."
Really? The Hobbit isnt a childrens book?..."
Of course The Hobbit is a children's book. But the films seem to be trying to turn it into something more like The Lord of the Rings.


loved this book as a child, still love it!"
I have even read it as an adult. Love the book


My sentiments exactly (see also messages 23, 25 and 32...). I wouldn't consider Les Miserables (#318), Watership Down (#42), The Hunger Games (#24), The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (I'm not talking about a strongly abridged children's edition but the Penguin Classics edition mentioned here at #101), the books by J.R.R. Tolkien (#3 and #48), Romeo and Juliet (#162), Twilight (#232), Lord of the Flies (#366), Shakespeare's Sonnets (#379), Hamlet (#414) and Anna Karenina (#471) children's books either. And those are just the titles I recognized.
The Hobbit, currently #3, is the only book debatable, although personally I would not let a child read it. The Koninklijke Bibliotheek (Royal Dutch Library) does not classify the Dutch translation of The Hobbit as 'jeugdboeken' (= children's books) either, by the way.
High time someone cleaned this list up, I'd say...

I admit I've read the book years ago, in a Dutch translation when I was in my teens (16 or 17, or something like that), but from what I remember, even then I thought there was more to the book then 'just' the story. In addition, to me there is a difference between children and young adults, something which, I guess, even if acknowledged, is not always a straight division? I guess it's the same with the Harry Potter books/films. Here in the Netherlands there is an age limit recommendation set for the Harry Potter films (and I remember the limit going up a bit at the third one). It doesn't mean everyone does, or always should do, as is recommended of course and apart from that, there might be different limits set in different countries as well. But as to De Hobbit, to me there was more than just the story on the surface, which is why I wouldn't give it to a child to read. I can't be the only one to resason this way, because when I was a child, the public library here even had a section for kids of 13 and over... I had a look at recent reviews on GR, and I agree with 'Kim', for instance. But, as I said earlier, The Hobbit is debatable :-)


Reading what you wrote makes me wonder if there might be a special children's edition in English? Some of the covers and series seem to imply so, see The Hobbit or The Hobbit, for instance.
I had a look just now to see if there was an age limit on the movies here in the Netherlands, and there is: 12 years old seems to be the minimum age for The Hobbit films here.


I first read The Hobbit when I was eight years old. It was a great introduction to the world of fantasy and sci fi books.

I wouldn't think so. The Hobbit seems a bit of a stretch for me as a children's book."
I also wondered about Night. A classic ce..."
I noticed several books on the list that I wouldn't consider children's books either.

Related News
Mahogany L. Browne is the author of Chlorine Sky, Woke: A Young Poets Call to Justice, Woke Baby, and Black Girl Magic. She's also the...
Anyone can add books to this list.