Umm....House of Leaves is on this list twice.

Amy wrote: "Umm....House of Leaves is on this list twice."

Lots of lists have books on them more than once. I don't know why nobody notices this.

How is The Handmaid's Tale meta?

Checked for duplicates: 2 books removed.

Clearly some people have a rather odd idea of what is meant by 'metafiction'. The term was coined in 1970 by the American writer William Gass, and it makes decreasingly little sense to use it in connection with writing before the 20th century - though it's perfectly fair to acknowledge isolated prototypes as early as Tristram Shandy and Jacques the Fatalist.

I think that the main point is that somewhere in the text the reader's attention must be explicitly drawn to the fictionality of the reading experience, and in a way that isn't just incidental. It isn't enough for the book to have been written during the postmodern period, or to exhibit other postmodernist features.

If one ignores this, one ends up suggesting, with Patricia Waugh in her book Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-conscious Fiction (1988) that "all fiction is...implicitly metafictional": trivially true, but not useful. It doesn't help that 'metafictional' seems to have been used quite casually elsewhere as a synonym for 'postmodernist', which it isn't.

Paul wrote: "Clearly some people have a rather odd idea of what is meant by 'metafiction'. The term was coined in 1970 by the American writer William Gass, and it makes decreasingly little sense to use it in co..."

Or Don Quixote.

Checked for duplicates: 1 book removed.

But to be quite frank, to be useful this list would have to be reduced by two-thirds.

As the original creator of this list, I'd love to trim off the books I don't consider metafiction, but I don't see any way for me to do so. Seems we're at the mercy of the Goodreads voters :/

The crux - and the beauty - of open lists is the more users are involved, the more it gets watered down.

(But I really love that list, nevertheless.)

Abigail wrote: "As the original creator of this list, I'd love to trim off the books I don't consider metafiction, but I don't see any way for me to do so. Seems we're at the mercy of the Goodreads voters :/"

As the list creator, you should be able to remove anything that doesn't fit the bill, surely? You are allowed to remove books that are 'totally miscategorized', after all.

You might have to be a little more prescriptive in the list description. For example, Nabokov's 'Pale Fire' (#6) seems fine; but what makes 'Lolita' (#7) metafictional?

Paul wrote: "As the list creator, you should be able to remove anything that doesn't fit the bill, surely? You are allowed to remove books that are 'totally miscategorized', after all."

I would love to remove miscategorized books, but I don't see any way to do that. All I can do is edit the description and rate my own suggestions for the list; I've been unable to find any way to remove books from the list. If you have any ideas on how to do that, I'm all ears!

Abigail wrote: "Paul wrote: "As the list creator, you should be able to remove anything that doesn't fit the bill, surely? You are allowed to remove books that are 'totally miscategorized', after all."

I would lo..."If you can edit the list at all, you should be able to see two links (after you press 'edit' after the description on the first page) that give you two further options: 'check for duplicates' and 'remove individual books'. If you can't see those links, you don't have full editing privileges.

If you'd like to list books here that you want to see removed, I'll happily remove them for you.

This list, probably well intended, is not as useful as other lists, because the rubric, Metafiction, is stretched to unrecognizable degrees. "Meta" (a.k.a. "reflexive") means it's clearly about the work's own genre & medium--whether fiction, painting, or theatre. No Shakespeare is metafiction, because (a) it's drama, and (b) there's no centering on writing (even when letters are pivotal). Ditto "Godot." If reviewers think works are *allegories* for writing/reading/fiction, that's an interpretation for an essay, not criterion for basic categorizing to help fellow list users.

Yeah. a lot of these REALLY do not belong on a metafiction list. Disappointing. Sort of ruins the utility of the whole thing.

Paul wrote: "But to be quite frank, to be useful this list would have to be reduced by two-thirds...If you'd like to list books here that you want to see removed, I'll happily remove them for you."

I agree. Here are a few to prune to start with:

Little, Big
Understanding Comics
Redshirts
Duma Key
Don Quixote
the Poe collection
Winne the Pooh
Wicked
Much Ado About Nothing
Hamlet
Jonathan Strange
Orlando
The Handmaid's Tale
Northanger Abbey
French Lieutenant's Woman
Dark Tower series
Peter Pan
S.
Lolita
Princess Bride

I would argue for keeping The Princess Bride on a list of metafiction. The author frames the story as an abridged retelling of an older book with the "boring bits" taken out, and he frequently alludes to this older book throughout the text.

I just rechecked, and though I can edit the description and remove duplicate books, I don't have the option to remove individual books (even though I originally created the list).

I agree with Michele's list to prune, with the exception of S., which is certainly metafiction. While some of those books have metafictional elements, they aren't necessarily books I would assign in a course about metafiction (which is more of what I was going for in creating the list).