From the Bookshelf of Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy…

The Hobbit, or There and Back Again

J.R.R. Tolkien

Start date: October 1, 2012

Finish date: October 31, 2012

Discussion: Book Discussions

Why we're reading this: Group Classic discussion October 2012
[close] Group Classic discussion October 2012

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 250 topics — 8,801 comments total

Book Discussions

"Cyteen" by C.J. Cherryh
By deleted member · 48 posts · 105 views

last updated May 24, 2025 11:25PM

Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell by Susanna Clarke
By deleted member · 46 posts · 150 views

last updated Mar 28, 2025 02:28PM

showing 10 of 27 topics view all »

What Members Thought

Jun 05, 2009 Tracey rated it it was amazing

Shelves: fantasy, dragons, inklings

Looking for a review of The Hobbit? This isn't that. Unless you count it as expressing my deep love for it, of course. Enjoy.

He Didn’t Mean To Adventure
– The story of The Hobbit, singable to the tune of Billy Joel’s “We Didn’t Start the Fire” (try it!) (spoilers...)

Bilbo is respectable in Bag End Under Hill
Till “Gandalf tea Wednesday” and a rune scratched on the door.
Fili Kili Ori Óin, Dori Nori Bombur Glóin
Bifur, Dwalin, Bofur, Balin – are there any more?!
Yes: Thorin especially; Gandalf makes f ...more

43 likes · Like · see review

Nov 29, 2009 Carrie rated it it was amazing

Shelves: favorites, 2024-books-to-read, mgr, fantasy, 4-and-a-half-to-5-stars, classics, re-read, j-r-r-tolkien, need-to-re-read, m-g

This re-read was just as wonderful this time around.

10 likes · Like · see review

Oct 11, 2009 Gaijinmama rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: classics, fiction, fantasy, favorites, re-read

Full disclosure: I am a life-long Tolkien geek. Mock me, and I'll cuss you out in Elvish. And then I'll breathe a bit of fire at you.
This is the prequel to The Lord of the Rings. I actually read LOTR first when I was 9 years old (back when dinosaurs walked the earth...) and it was rough going, so I highly recommend reading The Hobbit first. It explains a lot of things that are important to the trilogy. Also, unlike LOTR, this is a children's book. It's not just for children, by any means, but it ...more

6 likes · Like · see review

Aug 31, 2011 Tracey rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: fantasy, old-favorite, inklings

From my blog.

I said on a different edition that it was impossible for me to review The Hobbit. I don't know if this will count any more as a review than the parody I posted there does, but here, at the least, are some thoughts on a reread.

It's been a very long time since I read The Hobbit, and having read LotR over and over (and over) in the meantime made it particularly interesting to take note of the seeds for the later story planted liberally throughout this smaller story. (Funny - I alway From my blog.

I said on a different edition that it was impossible for me to review The Hobbit. I don't know if this will count any more as a review than the parody I posted there does, but here, at the least, are some thoughts on a reread.

It's been a very long time since I read The Hobbit, and having read LotR over and over (and over) in the meantime made it particularly interesting to take note of the seeds for the later story planted liberally throughout this smaller story. (Funny - I always think of it as a short little book, but the page count is in the same general neighborhood (or at least zip code) as FotR, TTT, and RotK (after you've subtracted the appendices and indices).) There's the Necromancer, driven out – to recoup and begin a rise later as the Dark Lord. Elrond ponders the future; he doesn't expect it all to happen as quickly as it did. There are the Eagles, as yet unnamed. Rivendell, and Bilbo's happiness there; cram, and even some giant spiders; the Ring, of course, and Bilbo's constant use of it. I wonder how much of it was retro-fitted.

Another fascinating thing was how very much Tolkien's writing and the entire setting of Middle-earth matured between The Hobbit and LotR. Not that The Hobbit isn't a confident and beautifully written story – it surely is, and I took an absurd amount of pleasure in reading the first several chapters (softly) out loud. There is a joy to it, an exuberance, that is muted in LotR, which feels like the youth of LotR's adulthood.

That being said, in Tolkien's letters he states that, although its origins were at the bedsides of his sons and daughter, The Hobbit's publication was not aimed at an audience of children. This is a little undermined by the tone of the book, the language of the narrator, which is often very much a chatty "don't worry, it all comes out lovely in the end" "Princess Buttercup doesn't get eaten by the Eels at this time" sort of thing, very British-children's-book. On the other hand, some of the content is very un-children's-book-like, at least by today's standards. While there are the walking-on-hind-legs ponies and other creatures of Beorn's acquaintance, a strong children's book element – indeed, all of the talking and almost-talking animals have that feel – still, the intrepid troupe of gold-seekers goes through one hell of a lot of ponies. The baker's dozen +1 borrowed from Beorn makes it home safely – but every time you turn around in this book there goes another batch of ponies down something's gullet. Good thing they weren't all named like Sharp-ears, Wise-nose, Swish-tail and Bumpkin, and White-socks my little lad... Also, strong drink flows copiously, and everyone smokes – so very un-PC - and all the talk of smoke rings almost make me want to take up a pipe.

More, though, an underlying theme of the book is that greed, gold-lust, is one of the most powerful forces there is. Thorin is never a very nice person, but give him a glimpse of gold, the hint of the presence of the Arkenstone, and he would all but toss his brother's sons Fili and Kili into Smaug's mouth to claim it. Well, maybe not Fili or Kili, but probably Bombur, anyway. Even Bilbo succumbs a bit to the gold-lust. In a way it's a foreshadowing of the power of the Ring.

(I sincerely apologize for the unintentional dwarf-tossing in the previous paragraph.)

There are no real stereotypical heroes in The Hobbit. The main characters - primarily Bilbo, and then Gandalf, and then the thirteen dwarves - are engaging and entertaining companions, but none of them perform the major heroic acts of the book, at least not "onscreen". Yes, Gandalf kills the chief goblin, but it's not a definitive act: it doesn't do much to help the cause, throwing the goblins into confusion but not stopping them. Bilbo is, over and over, an almost accidental hero - and a true one, in that he conquers his deep, deep fears and saves his friends – but what struck me is that the arc of the story is about going to reclaim the hoard from the dragon, and the pivotal action of killing the dragon is not performed by any of the fifteen main characters. In the ultimate battle, the Battle of the Five Armies, the pivotal moment is not so much the entry of Thorin and Company but that of Beorn. It surprised me a little; LotR is in so many ways a very different sort of story. ...more

5 likes · Like · see review

May 08, 2009 Kevis Hendrickson rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

The interesting thing about The Hobbit is how close it came to never seeing the light of day. J.R.R. Tolkien's classic children's fantasy book only exists because he was bored while grading his students' papers and accidentally created the mythical creatures known as Hobbits.

But I think The Hobbit in particular came into being because Tolkien loved the old fairy tales and myths and couldn't find any contemporary books like the old ones he enjoyed reading. The Hobbit is such a fun book to read th ...more

2 likes · Like · see review