From the Bookshelf of Catching up on Classics (and lots more!)…

The Scarlet Pimpernel

Emmuska Orczy

Start date: March 1, 2015

Finish date: March 31, 2015

Discussion: New School Classics- 1915-2005

Why we're reading this: Revisit the Shelf Reread, March 2015

Book of the Month, June 2011
[close] Revisit the Shelf Reread, March 2015

Book of the Month, June 2011

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 398 topics — 15,996 comments total

New School Classics- 1915-2005

* Finding New School Book Threads
By Bob , Short Story Classics · 2 posts · 428 views

last updated Dec 31, 2023 11:38AM

Farewell, My Lovely - Spoilers
By Sara , New School Classics · 26 posts · 59 views

last updated Nov 08, 2025 06:58PM

showing 10 of 79 topics view all »

What Members Thought

Aug 15, 2017 Julie rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: classic-novels, fin-2017

I have no idea why some people classify this novel as a classic piece of literature. Just because it was written over a hundred years ago doesn't automatically make it a great novel. Orczy is not in the same league as Tolstoy or Dickens or Shakespeare. She did not write a number of brilliant works that hold up to the passage of time and remain relevant. She did, I think, write the first superhero novel. I read that the creators of Batman were influenced by The Scarlet Pimpernel and I totally see I have no idea why some people classify this novel as a classic piece of literature. Just because it was written over a hundred years ago doesn't automatically make it a great novel. Orczy is not in the same league as Tolstoy or Dickens or Shakespeare. She did not write a number of brilliant works that hold up to the passage of time and remain relevant. She did, I think, write the first superhero novel. I read that the creators of Batman were influenced by The Scarlet Pimpernel and I totally see that. At times I felt like I was reading the pulpy novelization of an action movie. I'm sure at the time of the release of this book (and the accompanying play) the plot seemed fresh and daring. Now, of course, it's just one long cliche and common trope. The comparisons to a Scooby Doo episode are not far off the mark.

The plot is extremely far-fetched and the characters one dimensional. I kept waiting for a supernatural element to be introduced in order to explain the disguises the S.P. used. I couldn't suspend my disbelief enough - there is no way he could turn himself into a petite elderly woman. Just....no. He's supposed to be huge. How does he hide his height and girth? Hmmmm. And Marguerite -the cleverest woman in Europe! - spends hours with him while he is disguised and doesn't notice? Hmmm. The S.P.'s superhuman strength is also over the top. He is beaten so severely he loses consciousness yet he is still able to walk a mile and a half in the pitch dark through the rough countryside carrying Marguerite? Hmmmm.

Orczy is a mediocre writer. If I read the word "inane" one more time I was going to scream. Were thesauruses not invented when she wrote the book? She tells the reader, she doesn't show the reader. Don't tell me Marguerite is "the most clever woman in Europe" over & over & over. Show me! Instead, Marguerite is incredibly dense throughout the book. I couldn't get over how she kept forgetting people - forgetting her husband, forgetting her brother, forgetting that guy that helped her get to France. Where was the cleverness?

The romance between Marguerite and her husband befuddled me. They got secretly married after a whirlwind courtship because he was sexually attracted to her and she really enjoyed how much he desired her. She didn't love him but loved that he loved/wanted her so much. Then, after the marriage, they almost immediately have a falling out and never talk about it because both are too proud. Marguerite suddenly decides she passionately loves her husband because.....um, that wasn't totally clear to me. Because she found out he was secretly the S.P.? Or something like that.

Finally, that crazy antisemitic chapter of the book "The Jew" - what the hell!?!? That came out of no where. It was like talking to someone at a party, thinking they are cool, when suddenly they start talking about n*ggers and f*ggots. Whoa! Didn't realize how horrible you were! Thanks for sharing that tidbit about yourself! It wasn't just that Orczy was showing some of her characters to be bigoted towards Jewish people. She, the third person narrator, was writing these horrid descriptions.

"His red hair, which he wore after the fashion of the Polish Jews, with the corkscrew curls each side of his face, was plentifully sprinkled with grey- a general coating of grime, about his cheeks and chin, gave him a peculiarly dirty and loathsome appearance. He had the habitual stoop, those of his race affected in mock humility in past centuries, before the dawn of equality and freedom in matters of faith, and he walked behind Desgas with the peculiar shuffling gait which has remained the characteristic of the Jew trader in continental Europe to this day."

"She felt as if he held Percy's fate in his long, dirty hands."

"The eyes of the Jew shot a quick, keen glance at the gold in his interlocutor's hand."

"With a final, most abject and cringing bow, the old Jew shuffled out of the room."

Talk about a buzz kill. I was already having issues with the book and that chapter was like the final nail in the coffin.

I give the book 2 stars because it does have a historical interest in the sense that Orczy created a Batman/Superman sort of hero and that is intriguing. Also, I am a sucker for books set in that time period. Even mediocre books like this one.

...more

3 likes · Like · see review

Jun 04, 2011 Trisha rated it it was amazing

Shelves: classics, best-ever

Fantastic book! I loved it! There were heroes and villains, intrigue and disguises, suspense and plot twists, and action right down to the very end. I can honestly say that this was a fun, exciting, feel-good story!

1 like · Like · see review