Nataliya’s review of Water for Elephants > Likes and Comments

161 likes · 
Comments (showing 1-25 of 25) (25 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Becky (new)

Becky Nataliya, if you enjoyed old Jacob's story, I think that you might enjoy Losing Julia by Jonathan Hull. This is a war story, and a love story, and also has old/young narrative lines, but I thought it was fantastic and realistic, and surprisingly funny at times.

It's a great book. :)

Great review though, and I especially liked the parts about "that Twilight guy". LOL

PS. I got here through a friend liking your review. Totally not a creepy Water For Elephants stalker trying to push (what I thought was) a better book. LOL


message 2: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Becky, thanks for recommendation. I will check out that book - seems interesting from the description.


message 3: by Amanda (new)

Amanda Great review--I laughed several times! I may have to give this one a pass since I suspect your entertaining review is better than the book.


Stephanie *Very Stable Genius* I wasn't a huge fan of this one either....great review. Very funny.


message 5: by Betty (new)

Betty Wright You lost me at "that guy from twilight".


message 6: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Betty wrote: "You lost me at "that guy from twilight"."

Unfortunately, that's how I will always think of him. But it's his own fault - no one held a gun to his head forcing him to star in that (as far as I know). He's not that bad of an actor, actually - it's just that it's hard to be any good playing a self-hating emo sparkler without many facial expression.


message 7: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya I must have been in a really good mood when I rated it. But I did enjoy the story of old Jacob, and that's what all those stars go to. A cranky but feisty old guy - that's what I really loved reading about. That was unexpectedly touching. The rest of the story - meh.


message 8: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Kat wrote: "Funny that you think of Pattinson as 'that Twilight guy'. I still think of him as Cedric Diggory. ;)"

I did think that for a while as well, but eventually the pancake makeup/lipstick/bad hair combo imprinted itself on my poor neurons :(


message 9: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya I would love that! But then I would never be able to completely horrify people who somehow were lucky to escape any knowledge about the Twilight craze (like my mother, bless her innocent soul) with the whole abusive relationship/extreme codependency/'and also, they sparkle!' scary combo! I love watching people's eyes get wider and wider as I tell them about the sparkliness :D

Of course, rereading this, I realize that getting rid of my Twilight-i-fied neurons is the only possible way to proceed.


message 10: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya I want to see that movie! Usually I laugh along with Twilight with RiffTrax.
(Plus I should keep the neurons anyway - I don't have that many of them to begin with, and maybe I can retrain them to do more productive things).


message 11: by Nicole (new)

Nicole I just saw the movie and am glad I never bothered with the book. The Twilight guy was good (haven't seen the movies but I do think he is beautiful) but there was absolutely no chemistry between him and Reese Witherspoon. I think she was miscast. Somehow, I have never felt the urge to pic up the book and now am sure I never will. Thanks for your review.


message 12: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Nelly wrote: "I just saw the movie and am glad I never bothered with the book. The Twilight guy was good (haven't seen the movies but I do think he is beautiful) but there was absolutely no chemistry between him..."

Believe it or not, even the weak chemistry between Jacob and Marlena in the movie was still better than what we see in the book (and same goes for Jacob and Rosie the elephant ;) August was the only character who was done very well in the book (with the exception of old Jacob).


message 13: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Ashley wrote: "Also I regret that your review is so prominent when it appears as though you probably haven't even read the book. I feel bad for people who come here seeking decent reviews only to find poor "enter..."

Uncalled for, Ashley. I have read the book, every single page of it, despite you thinking otherwise. I also gave it a three-star rating, which to me means 'liked it but nothing special'. Is that's what the issue is for you here?

I don't quite see what makes my review a 'poor "entertainment" review' in your opinion - I do explain why I gave the book the rating that I did. Maybe you disagree with my opinion (obviously) and love this book more than I did, but that does not invalidate my opinion. You enjoyed it, I did to a lesser extent, and neither of us is wrong.


message 14: by Josh (new)

Josh Damn, I actually found this to be an exceptionally fair review, and if I pick the book up I might expect to skim good chunks of it. I'm so confused on where someone could get the idea that it was a joke review? Either that comment was meant to be directed elsewhere, or she automatically assumes pictures = joke.


message 15: by Jenn (new)

Jenn I love this review! Maybe I will even watch the movie after reading the book! :)


message 16: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Jenn wrote: "I love this review! Maybe I will even watch the movie after reading the book! :)"

Thanks, Jenn!


message 17: by Michel (new)

Michel Avenali Great review as per usual Nataliya. I picked up this book and I am thoroughly enjoying it.


message 18: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Michel wrote: "Great review as per usual Nataliya. I picked up this book and I am thoroughly enjoying it."

Thanks, Michel! I'm glad to see that you loved this book.


message 19: by Kendra (new)

Kendra Great review, I was trying to decide if I should read it since I kind of liked the movie. I thought it was weird that they casted Reese to play the love interest of Pattinson. Isn't she mid thirties now and he's barely old enough to drink? Or maybe that was a detail in the book but not mentioned in the movie. Anyway it was a big help!


message 20: by Tiffany (new)

Tiffany Wonderful review! Thanks to you, I might get it on my next trip to the library! I considered watching the movie, and happened upon it a Target one day, though I only read the back and didn't actually get the movie. BUT I happened to notice it mentioned the book, and (at that time) I had no knowledge if there being a book! It sounded interesting enough, so decided to do my usual reach on GoodReads to see if it was worth reading. I didn't even know who's point of view it was from, let alone know it was all about a memory! (Backs of movies give no information!) Hope I enjoy it a little more than you did. Thanks again!


message 21: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Tiffany wrote: "Wonderful review! Thanks to you, I might get it on my next trip to the library! I considered watching the movie, and happened upon it a Target one day, though I only read the back and didn't actual..."

Thanks, Tiffany!


message 22: by Kate (new)

Kate Your math! That is funny!


message 23: by Tim (new)

Tim Meechan You should be a politician, that last line was perfect, "you enjoyed it, I did to a lesser extent ", too bad we suddenly live in a world where your "wrong" just for having a different opinion. BTW, I'm only halfway but I think 3 was generous😋.


message 24: by Diana (new)

Diana "The story developments become more and more superficial and detached as the story progresses, as though the author ran out of steam and was finishing the book only because she was under contract to do so."

An accurate description of NaNoWriMo, which apparently this book was a product of.


message 25: by Mugdha (new)

Mugdha Your math is perfect


back to top