Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “La virtud del egoísmo” as Want to Read:
La virtud del egoísmo
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

La virtud del egoísmo

3.47  ·  Rating details ·  10,757 Ratings  ·  436 Reviews
Entre 1933 y 1982 Ayn Rand lanzó al mundo su filosofía objetivista con una claridad de razonamiento que la convierte en una figura gigante de la filosofía. Su precisión y sencillez son singulares. Su sistema filosófico racional, basado estrictamente en la lógica y en la realidad, carece de contradicciones y resulta coherente con la naturaleza del hombre. Sus ideas enfrenta ...more
Hardcover, 208 pages
Published May 28th 2006 by Grito Sagrado (first published 1961)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about La virtud del egoísmo, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about La virtud del egoísmo

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Gene Wagendorf III
Sep 26, 2007 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Those with conficts of interest/morality
Shelves: non-fiction
I didn't really get this book when I first read it, but having read it multiple time since, it's become like a bible. Rand outlines her Objectivist philosophy and explains the concept of rational self-interest. This book will turn you into an asshole once you read it, someone will smack you, you'll read it again, pick up the part everyone misses (about morality being intrinsic, not non-existent) and then you'll live a happier, more whimsical life.
Mar 18, 2007 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book once meant a lot to me. When I was 15. If anything written by Ayn Rand means a lot to you and you're not going through adolescence, you should be ashamed of yourself. Yeah, I know I sound like a self-righteous douchebag, but seriously. Give me a break.
Part II of multi-part review series.

Reading Rand reminds me of teaching freshman composition at university years ago. There’s not nearly as many spelling errors, but Rand’s pronouncements bear all the markers of severe Dunning-Kruger effect: under-researched, un-theorized, insufficiently self-aware.

For instance, this text has a tendency to adopt dogmatic solecisms, such as “In popular usage, the word ‘selfishness’ is a synonym of evil” (vii)--uh, not really. This is a nasty problem throughout t
Apr 12, 2009 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: philosophy
Ayn Rand was not afraid of turning conventional wisdom on its head. For millennia, one of the few ethical principles that prevailed across cultures was the value of altruism, i.e. , giving up your life for the benefit of others. Rubbish, writes Rand.

Rand was as anti-community and pro-individual as anyone I have ever read. Adamantly opposed to coercive state and religious power, she built a philosophy, Objectivism, on rational thinking and reason. She became too dogmatic and rigid for my taste in
Jun 16, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
The best thought I embraced from this book was a simple, yet powerful, soundbite: "A plant will not destroy itself, but man will".

Towards the end of the school year, a couple of kids in class had some serious self-destructive behavior--not just your run-of-the-mill, "I didn't do my homework." I dropped math for the day and we had an outstanding class discussion about how a plant will grow around a rock to seek light, and that roots grow deep to seek water--doing everything it can to sustain itse
Apr 29, 2011 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Just noticed this in Johan Hari's column from today's Independent:
Trump probably won't become the Republican nominee, but not because most Republicans reject his premisses. No: it will be because he states these arguments too crudely for mass public consumption. He takes the whispered dogmas of the Reagan, Bush and Tea Party years and shrieks them through a megaphone. The nominee will share similar ideas, but express them more subtly. In case you think these ideas are marginal to the party, reme
May 15, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Altruism ain't all its cracked up to be.

Although she tends to take things a bit too far, Rand touches on an often overlooked point of life: we are the ones best-equipped to care for ourselves. It is a wonderful and necessary aspect of humanity when we chose to show charity and care for others, but when is it appropriate to sacrifice ourselves for the well-being of another? You would jump into a rushing river to save your child, but would you do the same for an elderly stranger? A young stranger?
It's fitting that Rand's non-fiction reads like an advertisement for Atlas Shrugged; she is the ultimate capitalist after all. This is the lowest score I've yet given a book on this website; it's rare that I can't find something of significance to appreciate in any of the books I read. Although Anthem was a semi-interesting (if shrill) way to spend an afternoon, this essay collection is as bad as it gets. Supposedly a scholarly work of philosophy, this book has inspired many people (some of whom ...more
نمی دونم واقعاً اگر همه این گونه بشوند دنیا چگونه میشود ولی مهم نیست، من این گونه میشوم ...more
♥ Ibrahim ♥
Jun 30, 2008 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: literature
This woman, Ayn Rand, is more bizarre than bizarre can ever be! Who in the big, wide world would be in his right mind and still write a book to praise selfishness?! As if to be self-centered needs to be praised or called even virtuous! And she calls that philosophy! But with that spirit in which she praises selfishness you will find that a common theme in all of her writings. Look at Emmanuel Levinas,a real philosophers who never ceases to assure us that the "others" are we and for others we are ...more
Kevin J. Rogers
Ayn Rand was one of the most controversial thinkers--and successful fiction writers--of the 20th Century. Her detractors would claim that there is little to distinguish her fiction from her philosophy: that both are the result of a fantasist's distorted perspective on the world, tainted by an extreme egoism and fueled by some rather profound delusions. Her supporters would claim that it is the world as we know it that is distorted, mostly through the insidious influence of the philosophy of altr ...more
Rachel Terry
May 27, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sociology
It's a shock value title because the book is really about individualism vs. collectivism, and if you've read Atlas Shrugged or know about the Russia Rand immigrated from, you know where she stands on that issue.

There were a couple of chapters I liked in particular. I liked the discussion about the importance of property rights. Rand asserts that there are no individual rights without property rights. If people cannot claim the fruits of their labors as their own, they are completely at the mercy
Jul 13, 2008 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
I could write an entire dissertation on the inconsistencies of Rand's philosophy and the arguments she makes, but I'll behave and limit myself to just one criticism: she flagrantly disregards the meaning of the term "ethics" and argues that a purely "selfish" approach (i.e. one that is concerned only with one's self) is not only a rational thing to do, but it is, in fact, an ethical approach to take.

The first part of her argument does make sense if you boil rationality down to a purely biologica
Lisa (Harmonybites)
Ayn Rand was once asked if she could present the essence of her philosophy while standing on one foot. She answered: Metaphysics: Objective Reality; Epistemology: Reason; Ethics: Self-interest; Politics: Capitalism. I first encountered Ayn Rand through her works of fiction as a young woman barely out of my teens. Back then I was already an atheist, one with a great belief in science and reason. There was nothing in her "metaphysics" or "epistemology" that I found the least bit surprising or cont ...more
Aug 07, 2010 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I found this book to be worth reading.After twenty one years of sacrificing my life and raising two arrogant teenagers who remain ungrateful for my efforts.I understand what Rand is trying to say.We cant always do all the giving because we will end up spent with nothing to show for it.We must nurture ourselves always, in this way we will have inner strength and the ability to get through life regardless what may come our way.
I disagree that her philosophy is founded on a Dr. Spok mentality.Her
Ericka Clou
Note: Objectivism is deeply anti-Christianity, and anti-religion in general. You should not trust a politician that claims that he is both a Christian and a believer in the philosophies of Ayn Rand. He does not understand either Christianity or Objectivism, or possibly both, or he's a huge liar.

That said, this book isn't really what it sounds like. It's a collection of essays by Ayn Rand and Nathanial Branden that are not pro-heathenism per se. Rand and Branden try to explain how the philosophy
Jul 11, 2016 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: trash, philosophy
О ужас! Сделайте меня это развидеть! :) Если это "философия" (да ещё и "объективизма"), то тогда я - Папа Римский! Если даже это и философия, то "ключница делала" :((

1. Это не философские тексты, а пропаганда (ну или публицистика-эссеистика в лучшем случае). В текстах слишком много эмоций (особенно ненависти к инакомыслящим), и слишком мало строгой логики.

2. Главная авторская идея проста как 2х2 : эгоизм (и основанный на нём капитализм) - это хорошо (этично), а альтруизм (и основанный на нём с
Gregg Bell

Ayn Rand is an event. She had one of the most astute and utterly confident minds of all time. Whether she's right about what she thinks is a different story. But make no mistake--Ayn Rand thinks about thinking. She is a true intellectual.

That said, I think "The Virtue of Selfishness" is not her strongest effort. For starters it has an uncharacteristically provocative title. Which is okay, but when a title is too sensationalistic (a la Ivan Boesky's "Greed is good.") I'm always skeptical. There a

May 05, 2009 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book summarizes Ayn Rand's philosophy of Objectivism. I really like many of the values Objectivism champions: reason, ethics, self-love, self-esteem, self-reliance, individualism, joy, and pleasure. But emphasizing these in absolute terms, as polar opposites to other qualities, creates a lot of problems.

Like most Western philosophers, Rand is a dualistic thinker, which I find simplistic. To her, value and morality are objective, inherent in human nature. There is Self and Other, Moral and I
Mar 10, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Ayn Rand's philosophy, Objectivism, is often misinterpreted and misused, without ever being studied or even read. Often, the argument is that 'capitalism' has failed, and therefore Rand's philosophy is a failure as well. This is a strawman argument at best. The Virtue of Selfishness, as provocative a title as the book may have, is a philosophical synopsis of the application of Rand's philosophy, objectivism; it is not Rand's philosophy in itself.
Those that have read Rand know that her writing st
Nov 16, 2009 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This book by novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand, (author of "Atlas Shrugged" and "The Fountainhead") is an ethical treatise on her philosophy of Objectivism, which sets out the principles of rational egoism—selfishness—and is the answer to thousands of years of the ethics of self-sacrifice—altruism.

This morality is based on the needs of man’s survival, with one’s self as the standard of value, (hence selfishness,) and the pursuit of one’s own happiness as the moral ideal. Or, to quote Miss Rand:
Jun 14, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
The title of the book is slightly misleading as most people have no true philosophical understanding of what is "selfishness", immediately thinking of the irrational blanket understanding of individuals acting in grotesque mockery of true self interest, often harming themselves in the process. Her contention is that such people are not selfish enough, for if they were truly selfish, they would have their true self-interest at heart and are therefor acting irrationally and not selfish at all. Thi ...more
Anshupriya Goswamy
Apr 28, 2010 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: philosophy
Recently Right to Education was enacted and intellectuals hailed it as a major success of Indian democracy. As the Indian Govt paves the way for Right to Food Act, I see that there is an increasing need for more people to read this book and realise what they are witnessing is not the victory of Indian democracy over poverty and hunger, a victory of the principles of modern day altruism, the success of government over economic ills.

What we are seeing is the constant abdication of private rights t
Colin Gabriel
Oct 03, 2007 is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition
I heard it will make you an asshole.. I can't wait

on a side note I have a problem with reading while driving
Mar 21, 2010 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sociology
The star's for this: she writes a novel and then quotes one of the characters at length in this book. What chutzpah.

It's even better than the academics who cite things they haven't written yet.

Why have I picked it up? I'm sleeping badly. It made me closely examine what's in the bookshelf in the room in which I am generally living at the moment.

Oh yes. I see what's happened. Many years ago when I first moved into this house, I very sensibly put all the philosophy out in the spare bedroom where no
Feb 22, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Juan by: Nicolás Albertini
¡Queda claro que defiende el egoísmo cuando las únicas obras que cita son sus otros libros y sus artículos en revistas! Hablando en serio: encuentro difícil reseñar un libro así porque obliga a enfrentarse a cuestiones cotidianas en las que la ira te obliga a darle la razón, particularmente en las que tienen que ver con el individuo como pieza fundacional y fundamental del resto de estructuras; por otra parte, estoy de acuerdo con ella y el coautor en su antirracismo y el rechazo a las tiranías. ...more
Jan 27, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2017
This collection is very uneven in quality. Certain essays, especially toward the beginning, are poorly written and full of ridiculous thought. Most of Rand's essays in the first two thirds or so of the book are paraphrases of Atlas Shrugged (which both she and Branden cite constantly), and Branden has no original thoughts. He also makes some bizarre, baseless claims, and uses a painful style of writing. However, while all of Branden's essays are mediocre at best, Rand (even in her poorer essays) ...more
Benjamin Sauers
It is hard to know what to say about this book or Ayn Rand in general. I found myself in agreement with a very small minority of these essays. My favorite being the final one titled "The Argument from Intimidation" of which I am in resounding agreement. Ironically the final essay had nothing to do with the Objectivist Ethic, the main thesis of the collection, and more to do with the nature of rational discourse. Rand attempts to create a foundation for individual rights, which she seems to think ...more
This book is interesting because a good chunk of the time I either did not agree with Rand or I felt her supporting examples were poor or I felt she had swung to the opposite extreme of the one she was critiquing. So why give it five stars?

Rand's philosophy has/is having an enormous impact on our political sphere today. Yet it's always puzzled me how politicians who claim to practice a religion that basically commands altruism (especially in the New Testament) could so enthusiastically support s
May 17, 2009 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
After reading Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, I started this and was thinking- Oh boy, another collection of articles from Rand's Objectivist newsletter. Turns out there is a lot of good stuff here. The theme that runs through these essays is much the same as Unknown Ideal, as well as all of Rand's other works: In a truly free society, the individual is all-important. No man should be sacrificed, in whole or in part, for the benefit of another.

There are two articles here that I think many would f
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Ominous Parallels
  • Ayn Rand Answers: The Best of Her Q & A
  • God of the Machine
  • The Logical Leap: Induction in Physics
  • The Passion of Ayn Rand
  • Basic Writings of Nietzsche
  • The Capitalist Manifesto: The Historic, Economic and Philosophic Case for Laissez-Faire
  • Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government
  • The Criminal
  • The Ethics of Liberty
  • Libertarianism: A Primer
  • The Discovery of Freedom: Man's Struggle Against Authority
  • The Art of Reasoning
  • In Defense of Selfishness: Why the Code of Self-Sacrifice is Unjust and Destructive
  • The Market for Liberty
  • Ayn Rand and the World She Made
  • Honoring the Self: Self-Esteem and Personal Transformation
Alisa Rosenbaum was born in pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg to a prosperous Jewish family. When the Bolsheviks requisitioned the pharmacy owned by her father, Fronz, the Rosenbaums fled to the Crimea. Alisa returned to the city (renamed Leningrad) to attend the university, but in 1926 relatives who had already settled in America offered her the chance of joining them there. With money from the sa ...more
More about Ayn Rand...

Share This Book

“The man who does not value himself, cannot value anything or anyone.” 998 likes
“Men who reject the responsibility of thought and reason can only exist as parasites on the thinking of others.” 174 likes
More quotes…