What do you think?


Law, Liberty and Psychiatry
s/t: An Inquiry into the Social Uses of Mental Health Practices
Hardcover
First published December 12, 1989
About the author
Thomas Szasz
100 books329 followersThomas Stephen Szasz (pronounced /sas/; born April 15, 1920 in Budapest, Hungary) was a psychiatrist and academic. He was Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at the State University of New York Health Science Center in Syracuse, New York. He was a prominent figure in the antipsychiatry movement, a well-known social critic of the moral and scientific foundations of psychiatry, and of the social control aims of medicine in modern society, as well as of scientism. He is well known for his books, The Myth of Mental Illness (1960) and The Manufacture of Madness: A Comparative Study of the Inquisition and the Mental Health Movement which set out some of the arguments with which he is most associated.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
March 11, 2012
We choose. Szasz is uncompromising in this belief. We are not machines and thus we always have some choice in how we act- hence we are always responsible for our conduct. pg. 135. Szasz took this position 50 years ago in response to the criminal justice system’s attempt to find causal connections to criminal behavior. A trend that has heightened beyond anything he had to deal with in his time. Today we have drug courts, mental health courts, veteran’s courts, and the list goes on and will multiply as time passes. All motivated, in Szasz’s opinion, to escape the undeniable truth of what this system does. It punishes.
However, punishment is something we, as a society, have become increasingly uncomfortable in doing. We mask our true intent behind catch-phrases for rehabilitation, protection of the public and treatment. It’s easier to judge a man if you view him as inferior. And mental illness has become a term of classification to encourage oppression.
Szasz is relentless in damning the forensic psychiatrists who have blurred their responsibilities of treating patients with assessing their patient’s risk to society. The use of mental health “treatment” facilities as alternatives to prison have become the preferred tool of oppression. An excellent example can be seen in the civil commitments of sex offenders who are deemed dangerous after finishing their prison sentences. All under the guise of commitment, and not imprisonment, people can be locked away for the rest of their lives as they receive “treatment“. If you think this is hyperbole, look at Wisconsin State Statute Chapter 980. Other states have their versions too. Psychiatrists have become wardens.
Szasz is also equally blunt in how to address these issues. If we have lock up someone against their will, we must take responsibility for why we do so. If we do not like the choices a manic schizophrenic makes, we imprison them. Maybe it’s a prison, treatment facility or hospital. But it’s still imprisonment. Szasz challenges us to make our prisons humane places instead of carving out supposedly humane facilities for those who we sympathize. By making separate facilities, we trick ourselves into thinking that we aren’t oppressing people. We comfort ourselves with our sensitivity and pride ourselves on our humane dispositions. We lie to ourselves.
In this age of political correctness, it’s important to have thinkers like Szasz. Thinkers who remind us that changing the way we discuss things can be an instrument for positive change but it can also mask, and further complicate, the societal faults we are unwilling to face.
However, punishment is something we, as a society, have become increasingly uncomfortable in doing. We mask our true intent behind catch-phrases for rehabilitation, protection of the public and treatment. It’s easier to judge a man if you view him as inferior. And mental illness has become a term of classification to encourage oppression.
Szasz is relentless in damning the forensic psychiatrists who have blurred their responsibilities of treating patients with assessing their patient’s risk to society. The use of mental health “treatment” facilities as alternatives to prison have become the preferred tool of oppression. An excellent example can be seen in the civil commitments of sex offenders who are deemed dangerous after finishing their prison sentences. All under the guise of commitment, and not imprisonment, people can be locked away for the rest of their lives as they receive “treatment“. If you think this is hyperbole, look at Wisconsin State Statute Chapter 980. Other states have their versions too. Psychiatrists have become wardens.
Szasz is also equally blunt in how to address these issues. If we have lock up someone against their will, we must take responsibility for why we do so. If we do not like the choices a manic schizophrenic makes, we imprison them. Maybe it’s a prison, treatment facility or hospital. But it’s still imprisonment. Szasz challenges us to make our prisons humane places instead of carving out supposedly humane facilities for those who we sympathize. By making separate facilities, we trick ourselves into thinking that we aren’t oppressing people. We comfort ourselves with our sensitivity and pride ourselves on our humane dispositions. We lie to ourselves.
In this age of political correctness, it’s important to have thinkers like Szasz. Thinkers who remind us that changing the way we discuss things can be an instrument for positive change but it can also mask, and further complicate, the societal faults we are unwilling to face.
August 23, 2015
A fantastic read! Szasz coined the term 'Therapeutic State" which he uses in this book. This book offers a scathing condemnation of the many ways in which mental illness diagnosis and 'treatment' violated (in some cases, still violate) the Bill of Rights (he gives an amendment by amendment breakdown) and natural law. He examines the purpose and nature of the law, and concludes that all parties are best served when the principles of liberty and personal responsibility are upheld, as opposed to the models of paternalistic or therapeutic states. I can never get enough of Szasz, but this is one of his best.
August 26, 2024
A very, very interesting man.
A must-read for trainee psychotherapists!
A must-read for trainee psychotherapists!
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews




