Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Player Piano” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Player Piano

Kurt Vonnegut

3.86 · Rating details · 41,231 ratings · 1,648 reviews

Kurt Vonnegut’s first novel spins the chilling tale of engineer Paul Proteus, who must find a way to live in a world dominated by a supercomputer and run completely by machines. Paul’s rebellion is vintage Vonnegut—wildly funny, deadly serious, and terrifyingly close to reality.

Get A Copy

Or buy for

Paperback, 341 pages

Published September 2006 by Dial Press (first published 1952)

More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Player Piano, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

Best Dystopian and Post-Apocalyptic Fiction

3,115 books — 23,622 voters

Vonnegut's Best

38 books — 595 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

3.86 ·

Rating details

· 41,231 ratings · 1,648 reviews

Filter

Sort order

Jan 10, 2017 Lisa rated it it was amazing

Shelves: favorites, so-good-it-hurts, unforgettable

Man created machines in his own image...

And man and machine alike were told to worship one deity: the CORPORATE PERSONALITY!

The 10 Commandments according to the Church Of Corporate Thinking:

1. Thou shalt believe in one corporation
2. Thou shalt have no other corporations beside the one you serve
3. Thou shalt honour all traditions and communal behaviours of your corporation
4. Thou shalt accept whatever the corporation tells you as truth
5. Thou shalt have no other truths except for corporate truth
6 ...more

flag 133 likes · Like · see review

Jan 22, 2017 Adina rated it it was amazing

Shelves: dystopia, us

I just remembered that I did not review Player Piano. I did not have the time to do it when I finished the novel one month ago and then I forgot.

I am not going to write a full review because I lost the momentum, but I have a few comments.

First of all, If you never read Kurt Vonnegut I would not start with this one. It is very good but I believe it would be better savored by readers that already enjoyed other works by the author. This is his first novel and his fragmented writing style and sati ...more

flag 96 likes · Like · see review

Feb 17, 2017 Manny rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: donalds-are-trumps, science-fiction

In his first novel, published in 1952, Vonnegut envisages a dystopian future where nearly all jobs have been rationalised away by increasing automation. But, just when things seem most hopeless, a saviour appears in the form of a brash, uncouth but lovable billionaire, who, despite having no previous political experience, rides a populist wave to become President. He immediately expels all illegal immigrants and starts a war against an alliance of Middle Eastern and Asian countries. Within month ...more

flag 89 likes · Like · see review

Jan 25, 2017 BlackOxford rated it it was amazing

Shelves: american

The Cybernetic Script

One of the most important but least discussed consequences of WWII is an ideology. It is way of thinking that unites the political left and right, and even transcends the ideologies of Capitalism and Marxism with their apparent conflicts about the nature of human beings and their politics. It is an ideology that became and remains the dominant intellectual force in the world in my lifetime. This ideology goes by a name that is only occasionally used today and is probably rec ...more

flag 84 likes · Like · see review

Jan 15, 2018 J.L. Sutton rated it really liked it

When Kurt Vonnegut does dystopia (as he does in his first novel, Player Piano), you know it's not an empty idea for him to rail against, but a way for him (and us) to work out the implications of a new reality, in this case, our desire to improve the world with technology. In this early dystopian vision (set in the near future after WWIII), the world is nearly completely automated (like the player piano). Society's needs are apparently met. Far from bringing about happiness, automation only serv ...more

flag 82 likes · Like · see review

Aug 31, 2012 Lyn rated it really liked it

Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut was his first novel, first published in 1952. Early fiction from Vonnegut is told in a more straightforward fashion than Vonnegut readers will be accustomed to from his later works, but his imagination and wit are still unmistakable.

This is a dystopian work describing a United States after a third war where machines have taken the place of 90% of industrial workers. Government work available to displaced workers comes from either the Army, emasculated and bureaucra ...more

flag 65 likes · Like · see review

Aug 17, 2010 Petergiaquinta rated it liked it · review of another edition

It’s been almost thirty years since I read Player Piano, and all I had retained from that first read was the name of the main character, a faint recollection of the novel’s focus on a future world heavily reliant on automation, and a vague sense of not liking the book all that much despite Vonnegut being one of my favorite authors. I had hoped to like the book better as a seasoned adult, but instead I found re-reading Player Piano to be a tedious chore which surprised me, as this year I have ret ...more

flag 41 likes · Like · see review

Feb 13, 2017 Gabrielle rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: american, sci-fi, dystopian, own-a-copy, used-bookstore-finds, read-in-2017, mandatory-reading, speculative-fiction, reviewed

In a world where actuaries in Japan are getting fired by the hundreds because an algorithm now does their job, where Amazon's utterly creepy house robot Echo can organize your life and transfer info on your every move to God knows who, and where Google has created AIs that live on the Internet and talk to each other in an encrypted language so sophisticated that humans can't figure out what they are saying, "Player Piano" is eerily prescient.

In fact, as someone who works for a major insurance co In a world where actuaries in Japan are getting fired by the hundreds because an algorithm now does their job, where Amazon's utterly creepy house robot Echo can organize your life and transfer info on your every move to God knows who, and where Google has created AIs that live on the Internet and talk to each other in an encrypted language so sophisticated that humans can't figure out what they are saying, "Player Piano" is eerily prescient.

In fact, as someone who works for a major insurance company and who knows just how ridiculously dependent we are on your technology working well and how much we want our employees to be devoted body and soul to the company, this book felt disturbingly familiar from the very first page.

In a not so distant future, everything has been automatized and machines do all the work, nobody starves and the only jobs still available are the ones that can't be replaced by machines... and the army. But of course, a chasm exists between those who do simple manual work and the engineers and managers who overlook the exactitude of all those machines, effectively creating a polarized society.

Paul Proteus, an important engineer and manager of Ilium Works, can feel that something is not quite right with his life and with the world, but does not know how to deal with his malaise. His old friend and colleague Ed Finnerty has acknowledged that this way of life is hollow and unfulfilling a long time ago and resists the systematic automation of everything by not fitting into the mold of the brilliant engineer that he is.

One day, Paul is asked to betray his integrity for a better job and a secure social position and he finds himself incapable of doing it. He decides to rebel against this life that now feels so meaningless, but it's not as easy to escape the corporate beast as he seems to think. Especially when computers have a record of your entire lives...

In a parallel story line, we accompany the Shah of Bratpuhr's visit to America, his incapacity to perceive people who are not in charge as anything other than slaves (despite his translator's best efforts), and his amusement at the exotic and illogical American way of life.

The idea of the corporation as a Church, its employees as its worshipers and its executives as clergy is obviously not a new one, but it gave me a uncomfortable shiver. The corporate retreat, which is essentially a brain-washing vacation meant to cultivate your bond to the company and with your colleagues, the long ridiculous titles meant to glorify the simplest of jobs, more executives than executants... I see these things going on every day at work, and it's creepy. Add to that a President who is an actor, because charisma is more important than political skill for that job... *shudder*

I see human labor, skill and intelligence devalued a little bit more all the time, whether because we have become too reliant on our GPS to know how to read a map, or because products are now manufactured to break in a year or two so that we must buy a brand new one that turns out to be cheaper than repairing the old one... It makes me uncomfortable on so many levels...

Some people seem to think that Vonnegut has not yet sharpened his trademark wit and dark humor to their full potential when he wrote "Player Piano", but I found him to be just as brutally funny, vitriolic in his commentary and thought-provoking as in his later works. He had his finger on the simple reality that without a sense of purpose and usefulness, humans will loose their sense of identity and their spirits, and he wrote a great book about it.

Of course, he missed the mark on a few things: the Rust Belt's downfall, for instance. And the very old-fashioned gender-roles made me roll my eyes a few times. But dismissing this work just because a few things are not perfectly predicted would be a mistake. I recommend it to everyone. ...more

flag 41 likes · Like · see review

May 18, 2012 Joshum Harpy rated it it was amazing

I was working as a janitor the day that Kurt Vonnegut died. Sweeping the floors, I listened as the news came over talk radio and I remember distinctly standing up stiff and staring hard at the speakers while the news sank in. I had recently heard in interviews and read Vonnegut sharing his feelings about his own death. That he had reconciled himself to it and felt that he had done much with his life, that he was ready to go (I'm paraphrasing, of course his words were funnier and more acidic). St I was working as a janitor the day that Kurt Vonnegut died. Sweeping the floors, I listened as the news came over talk radio and I remember distinctly standing up stiff and staring hard at the speakers while the news sank in. I had recently heard in interviews and read Vonnegut sharing his feelings about his own death. That he had reconciled himself to it and felt that he had done much with his life, that he was ready to go (I'm paraphrasing, of course his words were funnier and more acidic). Still, standing there with my broom in an abandoned diner, I cried for Kurt. I wasn't crying because he had gone too soon, or because it was unjust or shocking, I cried for all of us who have to live in a world without him. His voice, his fierce, sentimental, hilarious and acidic cultural commentary shed light on our lives in a way no one else can. No one could ever hope to call "bullshit" so effectively, concisely, and with as much heart as Vonnegut spent his life doing. I have never read a book by Kurt Vonnegut that I didn't adore and this novel is perhaps one of his best.

A beautiful book about the reckless and relentless escalation of technology and automation, questioning if the inexorable rise of gadgetry in our time has really improved the quality of our lives. This was Vonnegut's first novel and it has a decidedly different feel than his larger body of work. It is a bit bleaker in tone and lacks the same degree of absurdist whimsey which Vonnegut later mastered. The humor is still there, but there is a desperation and darkness which is not softened by Vonnegut's typical absurdist shrug.

Written during the technological boom in the wake of WWII, this book was a dystopian projection of where that technology may lead. A significant element of the plot is the massive supercomputer EPICAC, buried in the winding caves of Carlsbad Caverns, a not so subtle reference to ENIAC, the world's first computer, which had gone online just 6 years before this book was published. This computer, which works on paper punch cards, vacuum tubes and magnetic tape, is very much dated with the popular technology of the time. However the dated nature of all the technology central to the story, only reinforces the theme of technology and automation escalating faster than humans can possibly understand the implications.

The protagonist, Paul Proteus, is a gifted and successful engineer on the verge of a breakdown due to his disillusionment with his profession and growing disbelief in the benefits of a fully automated world. He begins to sympathize with the dispossessed working class, which has been segregated by IQ into pointless lives where they have the choice of joining the military or doing construction work. Through this ordering of society by mechanistic intelligence, Vonnegut satirizes capitalism, hierarchical societies and the spiritually and emotionally void nature of a culture which worships the escalation of technology above all other concerns. The novel escalates from there in typical Vonnegut fashion as the reasonably likeable and humble Paul Proteus is pinballed around a world gone crazy.

Despite the novel being 60 years old (an aeon in terms of technological advancement these days), and most of the references to technology being at this point naive, antiquated and understated, this book is not only still relevant, it is more relevant by the second. We live in an age of transition so dramatic and technological in nature that the themes of this book define our era, and there is no writer I would trust more to call bullshit on our brave new world than Vonnegut. ...more

flag 30 likes · Like · see review

Jun 05, 2017 Sebastien rated it it was ok

Disappointed in this one, it was underwhelming. I hadn't read Vonnegut in a long time and was excited to read this. Unfortunately I found the characters rather unlikable, obnoxious, one-dimensional caricatures, while the narrative operated like a chess game in which I could guess most every move before it was made. I also found the messaging heavy-handed. Yeah, I agree or at least am concerned with most of the themes brought up, but it was done with a lack of subtlety that grated on me.

In terms Disappointed in this one, it was underwhelming. I hadn't read Vonnegut in a long time and was excited to read this. Unfortunately I found the characters rather unlikable, obnoxious, one-dimensional caricatures, while the narrative operated like a chess game in which I could guess most every move before it was made. I also found the messaging heavy-handed. Yeah, I agree or at least am concerned with most of the themes brought up, but it was done with a lack of subtlety that grated on me.

In terms of the societal and cultural critique I generally align with many of Vonnegut's positions. The critique encompasses worship of technology, efficiency, productivity, growth, meritocracy, materialism above all else. There is critique of elites hoarding opportunities, classism, all powerful and dictatorial corporations that strip away our rights couching it under the guise of "freedom" and "progress", the rules and rigidity of corporate management and bureaucracy, marriage of corporations and police state. In this atmosphere the powerful use their moralizing as a cudgel on "poorer" people (the underclass) to strip away their humanity (sound familiar?). Warps into a vulgar sort of anti-humanism camouflaged by grandiose and caricatured moralizing.

In this book elites tell themselves they are heroes, moral heroes, saving the rest of humanity while in actuality most of their actions and motives are self-serving and based on consolidating or increasing their power. Vonnegut makes commentary on all that. The one aspect he doesn't touch on is the environmental aspect and worries from an unrestrained system that cannibalizes everything in sight, and for me I see that as one of the most important issues that could lead to global civilizational crisis. But it's completely understandable that he doesn't hit this aspect because I don't think it was in the cultural zeitgeist of the times, it would take a few decades before this concern would really start to blossom in the culture.

There is a strong critique of techno-utopianism here, and that's cool. I'm fine with that, although Vonnegut comes across as more pessimistic than me on technology. Technology is mere tool, it is how humans use and apply it that matters. Technology, with proper policy and decent thinking, can benefit broad swathes of humanity. I don't fear machines, I don't fear technology, but I worry about the humans behind the machines who leverage these things for their power. The question is will the powerful keep co-opting technology in order to keep funneling and consolidating power and control for themselves, further walling themselves off from the rest of society? or will we have sensible policy and management of these technologies that allows a diverse range of people to benefit? I think we need to work hard to make sure society as a whole benefits.

I don't know a lot about the Frankfurt School, I've only read a few articles. But I wouldn't be surprised if Vonnegut was strongly influenced by their ideas and cultural critique because his own critique pretty much mirrors many of their views. In their views there is a cultural and spiritual sickness plaguing the modern world, with a cult of instrumental reason driving the way: https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-frankf...

It is easy to critique materialism, and the cult of materialism. Unfortunately I think it is valid, there is a spiritual and cultural vacuum and this materialism is filling the void in our culture and our lives. Materialism wouldn't matter as much if we had more solid foundations in spirit and culture. I do think the pendulum may be starting to swing the other way against hyperconsumerism, but it's hard for me to say for sure. In the end I just don't think hyperconsumerism is sustainable, not just in regards to the environment, but not sustainable in the economic, societal, and cultural aspects.

I do appreciate this book for its themes, its prescience, and its relevance to today's problems. I love Vonnegut in general but like I said, in spite of the themes I was disappointed with story-telling, characters, and ideological heavy-handedness. The themes do pose very important questions, questions that we will keep struggling to answer in the coming generations. ...more

flag 29 likes · Like · see review

Apr 03, 2017 da AL rated it it was amazing

Seriously, anything by Vonnegut is a must-read!

flag 25 likes · Like · see review

Jun 07, 2007 graycastle rated it did not like it

Shelves: scifi

There was a period in my life when I read all the Vonnegut I could get my hands on, which is mostly a very rewarding experience, but oh man, this is terrible. It's his first novel, and it really should've been a short story - even as a short story, it would've been forgettable. Classic scifi man/machine themes unleavened by the irony I would usually expect from Vonnegut, drawn out far too long, with characters who lack depth or interest. Read, I dunno, anything else by Vonnegut instead, and you' ...more

flag 24 likes · Like · see review

Oct 12, 2007 Matt Dorsey rated it really liked it

Is it acceptable to call a soft sci-fi dystopian novel badass? Does that reveal the total nerd at the core of my character?

The only reason I can see for this book not to be mentioned as one of Vonnegut's greats is that it's edged out by the half-dozen or so outright masterpieces in his canon. But for a first novel, this is ace. It's Vonnegut's most conventionally structured novel, and possibly even his least original. The plot is more or less a tweaking of Huxley's 'Brave New World' (Vonnegut h Is it acceptable to call a soft sci-fi dystopian novel badass? Does that reveal the total nerd at the core of my character?

The only reason I can see for this book not to be mentioned as one of Vonnegut's greats is that it's edged out by the half-dozen or so outright masterpieces in his canon. But for a first novel, this is ace. It's Vonnegut's most conventionally structured novel, and possibly even his least original. The plot is more or less a tweaking of Huxley's 'Brave New World' (Vonnegut himself has admitted this). Yet frankly, I like it better than that dystopia, as 'Player Piano' is more focused, has better flow, and the satirical elements don't rely as much on suspension of disbelief.

Kurt Vonnegut was not a luddite. This is important to keep in mind when considering the book's premise. The idea of mechanical labor replacing human workers is simply the means around which Vonnegut builds his multi-tiered assault on corporate aristocracy, to borrow an excellent and underused term from David Korten. The satire is wicked-sharp. Consumerism, the class divide, barriers to entry of higher education, and even peace-time mentality all get their comeuppance in Vonnegut's portrayal of a near-future America where socialism and manufactured material desires are used to sate the drive of the lower class (most of the population), while ass-kissing mono-talents get drunk off their own wealth and power. It's socio-political satire that's refreshingly more socio than political, and it's no less relevant now, 55 years after its first pressing, than it was then. Somewhere in the book's final third, the resistance movement gains a strong voice, and the writing may coax the reader into aligning with it. The wit and intellect of the author really comes through here: does this story have any heroes, or are the revolutionaries really just anarchists who by their nature must shake up whatever order there is?

After this, his first novel, Vonnegut went on to write far more original and versatile works, many of which I've read. Absent here are the non-linear narratives, single-word commentary sentences, chatty introductions and frequent narrator editorializing which would become his M.O. However, reading 'Player Piano' should make it obvious why he soon created his own rules for writing a novel: with his very first, he'd already done all he could within the bounds of conventional composition. 'Player Piano' is Vonnegut's most straightforward narrative, but also possibly his harshest and most thorough satire; his social discontent and bitterness does not jump out in short bursts here, but is more cool and collected, and therefore able to seethe beneath every word of this carefully constructed and brutal depiction of the powers-that-be and the trail of human wreckage left behind in the name of "progress". ...more

flag 22 likes · Like · see review

Feb 16, 2016 Brian rated it really liked it

This novel, Vonnegut's first, is a more traditional narrative than his later books. The story is told linearly, the chapters are much longer, etc. However, the unmistakable Vonnegut themes are very much present, and make their first appearances here. "Player Piano" deals with the ideas of the danger / dehumanizing effects of technology and how that interacts with basic human dignity. Writing in 1952 about the "false gods" of technology, one need only look around today to think that Vonnegut was This novel, Vonnegut's first, is a more traditional narrative than his later books. The story is told linearly, the chapters are much longer, etc. However, the unmistakable Vonnegut themes are very much present, and make their first appearances here. "Player Piano" deals with the ideas of the danger / dehumanizing effects of technology and how that interacts with basic human dignity. Writing in 1952 about the "false gods" of technology, one need only look around today to think that Vonnegut was a prophet foretelling our doom.
Frankly, I have a hard time nailing down "Player Piano" because I think it meant something different in its original context than perhaps it does now. There are times when the novel seems very anti-communist and anti strong centralized government. The line is even uttered by a government official "Are you against us?" implying that the State knows what is best for all. Clearly Vonnegut does not think that is the case. There is also a very intriguing character, the Reverend Lasher. Of particular interest to me was a scene in a saloon where the Reverend gives a lovely speech on the dangers of class warfare. Moments such as this seem tailor made for the early 1950s and what was happening at the time. They come across as a defense of capitalism and American values. If one has read Vonnegut's biography they know that despite the image many people have of him, these were issues that he cared about deeply.
I don't want to give away plot points, but the text left me with the distinct impression that Vonnegut had a negative opinion of the impetus and results of most revolutions. The novel is full of contradictions, showing the good and bad aspects of capitalism, communism, messianic leaders, uprisings / revolutions, technology, the advances of science, etc. I don't see where the novel comes down decidedly in one camp or the other. However, one thing the book seems definitive about is in its belief that the general population are nothing more than sheep that easily drift from whim to whim. Like Shakespeare Mr. Vonnegut, in this book at least, seems to have a low opinion of the masses. You only have to pay attention to the "common man" during an election season or during the midst of the latest pop culture fad to see that Vonnegut's pessimism is justified.
"Player Piano" is not as brilliant as Vonnegut's later books. It meanders at times and could have been edited into a "tighter" novel. However, there are many moments scattered throughout that make it worth your attention. It is thought provoking and timely, despite being 60 years old. It endures, and that alone is reason enough to read it! ...more

flag 18 likes · Like · see review

Jul 13, 2017 Neil rated it liked it

Player Piano felt different from other Vonnegut books: the sentences weren’t as bare, the pages were full and his fingerprint felt more spread out. Chapters ran twenty pages long which allowed for little details to creep in (like how a phone becomes moist after talking on it for a few minutes) and the main message of the book felt more sunken into the story than usual. If Vonnegut’s prose is fast food and James Joyce a steak house, then Player Piano falls somewhere around Applebee’s but with goo ...more

flag 14 likes · Like · see review

Dec 03, 2014 Tyler Jones rated it really liked it

There are probably several reasons why Kurt Vonnegut was such a popular writer, but I will give you two.

Reason one: His personality. Vonnegut had a distinct voice. Sarcastic and biting, yet also forever sticking up for the little guy. He was funny as hell. He had Personality - and it was this Personality that his readers adored. With each successive novel, his readership craved more of the same, which meant that the actual plot of the books became less important than the voice of Vonnegut himsel ...more

flag 13 likes · Like · see review

Nov 21, 2018 Kayıp Rıhtım added it · review of another edition

Shelves: Ütopya-distopya

Kayıp Rıhtım Kitap Kulübü'nün ikinci konuğu Otomatik Piyano olmuştu.

Kulüpteki tartışmaları buradan okuyabilirsiniz: https://forum.kayiprihtim.com/t/kr-ki...

flag 13 likes · Like · see review

May 09, 2015 Mr. C rated it really liked it

"The most beautiful peonies I ever saw," said Paul, "Were grown in almost pure cat excrement" (300).

Awesome...

I began to read this book the week SOL (an acronym Vonnegut would have loved.... like his EPICAC computer mainframe...) testing commenced at the high school I teach at... a full week, in other words, of licensed teachers getting paid to STARE at children take standardized computer-based examinations. These are the tests that apparently establish competence or confirm mental infirmity. T ...more

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Jul 08, 2010 Chloe rated it really liked it

Shelves: dystopian-fiction, not-owned, scifi-fantasy

For some reason I had thought that I had long ago run through the works of Kurt Vonnegut. He was one of the first writers whose books I can remember consciously deciding that I needed to read each and every one of. The moment is still clear in my memory- I had just been introduced to Kilgore Trout and his trunk of pulp novellas in Breakfast of Champions. I'm not quite sure what happened with that goal, but I'm guessing I lost the thread of the quest sometime after reading Galapagos back in high For some reason I had thought that I had long ago run through the works of Kurt Vonnegut. He was one of the first writers whose books I can remember consciously deciding that I needed to read each and every one of. The moment is still clear in my memory- I had just been introduced to Kilgore Trout and his trunk of pulp novellas in Breakfast of Champions. I'm not quite sure what happened with that goal, but I'm guessing I lost the thread of the quest sometime after reading Galapagos back in high school. So it was with much joy that I received the news that my book club had decided to read Vonnegut's first novel, Player Piano, published in 1952.

Dr. Paul Proteus lives in an allegedly utopian world. All industry has been mechanized, the sweat of the worker's brow replaced by the drip of oil from the pistons and pulleys manufacturing all the household goods, widgets and whatsits that EPICAC, a giant computer inhabiting the immenseness of the Carlsbad Caverns, has computed that Americans need in order to be happy. Only those who can program or repair the machines still have jobs in the traditional sense, the rest of the country's vast labor pool being forced to join either the army or what amounts to the Works Project Administration building bridges and roadways. As a member of the elite cadre that maintains the machines, and thus their power, you would think Proteus would be far more satisfied with his life. Yet he's not. He feels more at home slumming in bars with the disaffected across the river than he does in his immaculate home with his status-seeking wife and it's only a matter of time before this dissatisfaction with the world becomes out and out rebellion.

This book is classic Vonnegut in the sense that he has clearly seen the future repercussions of what his society was moving toward and railed against it as best he knew how. I can't help but draw comparisons to the rampant unemployment of today and the growing hordes of dispossessed unable to find even the most mundane of jobs. A service economy with no one to service. Vonnegut knew that, regardless of how often we rail against the strictures of employment, the majority of people derive satisfaction in earning an honest dollar. Remove this obligation and you are also likely to remove the sense of self worth a person has. Regardless of whether or not it's healthy to base one's self worth on their employability, this is the cultural message we inherit at birth- the value of honest labor. Of course, it's easy to rail against a system that disenfranchises millions but, as Vonnegut shows in Player Piano, it's damn near impossible to root it out.

What is missing from Player Piano, and the reason I can't give it that fifth star, is the trademark sense of humor that runs rampant through his other books. Sure, he's got his dystopian world and his biting satire but there is no sense of detachment or whimsy here. This is Vonnegut at his most acerbic, the cynicism that he would return to in his final years of writing during the Bush reign. This is a book written by a man who fully understands the harm that humans inevitably wreak upon ourselves and our world, but who has yet to admit to himself that it's all just one giant joke and the best thing we can do is lean back, sip our whiskey, and say "so it goes." ...more

flag 13 likes · Like · see review

Dec 08, 2015 Alex rated it liked it

Shelves: 2015, rth-lifetime, novel-a-biography

For his first book in 1952 Kurt Vonnegut made an entry in a long string of dystopian novels stretching back to (where else) Eugene Zamyatin's 1921 classic We. It's not the best entry.

The We Lineage
In order of quality:
1984
We
Brave New World
Player Piano
Anthem

These books all deal with futures in which social class has ossified and production has mechanized. They deal with the automation of society, and with socialism (in wildly different ways).

Vonnegut was a socialist. The way he deals with it is b ...more

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Dec 25, 2015 Elora rated it it was amazing

seriously loved this book 100%

flag 11 likes · Like · see review

Aug 19, 2008 Hank rated it really liked it

Recommends it for: managers and corporate cheerleaders.

Shelves: dystopian

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. You could see Vonnegut's genius in his first novel.

On a blog I read, the Devil Vet's been thinking about hope and hopelessness in dystopian fiction. I think Player Piano is good example of how hope plays into dystopian narratives. The Ghost Shirt Society of the book rises in rebellion against the soul-numbing mechanized society even though they know they will fail. Why? Simply to show that it can be done. That there can be light at the end of that tunnel, if power is wrested from the managers an You could see Vonnegut's genius in his first novel.

On a blog I read, the Devil Vet's been thinking about hope and hopelessness in dystopian fiction. I think Player Piano is good example of how hope plays into dystopian narratives. The Ghost Shirt Society of the book rises in rebellion against the soul-numbing mechanized society even though they know they will fail. Why? Simply to show that it can be done. That there can be light at the end of that tunnel, if power is wrested from the managers and engineers who hold it in that society. "Hope in hopelessness" indeed.

But then, that's one of Vonnegut's favorite themes (literally from the beginning, as we see) to kick around. You might have the whole world against you, you might know from the beginning that stretching your wings will just result in being shot out of the sky, but the exercise of whatever freedom you can snatch is worth the fall.

Of course, he didn't rely simply on ideas. The man could spin a yarn. The whole section of the book where Proteus has to go on an annual weekend team-spirit-building retreat had me chuckling through my anger. I hate that kind of workaday pep rally crap, and that particular scenario sounds like my idea of four days of hell. And the chapter in which Proteus buys a small, old school farm - thinking that will calm his need to get out of the "we are all cogs" system - and his wife takes it completely the wrong way sort of broke my heart. Though, I have to admit, I felt some for the wife - it's not like he spent any time communicating his feelings or situation to her.

The running thread of the Shah of Bratpuhr touring the US, with his guide in more and more dire straits, was a nice touch. Sometimes that kind of show-and-tell subplot can feel tacked on or unnecessary, but Vonnegut's storytelling allowed it to weave in and out of the major action.

final thought: No surprise, I agree with him. If you take away a person's chance to do for themselves, you take away a major reason to get out of bed every morning. I'm not saying we all have to work hard or die. I'm just saying, yeah, we all need that feeling of dignity that honest work can provide, whether for decent wages or just for our own benefit.

(epicdystopia.blogspot.com) ...more

flag 10 likes · Like · see review

Jan 12, 2013 Nathan Titus rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Vonnegut is one of my favorite writers, and this is my favorite book by him. However I don't consider it exactly a Vonnegut book because it is absolutely unlike anything else he has ever written.

Vonnegut likes to brag that he has never written a book with a villain in it. To that I add that he has never written a book with a hero in it except for Player Piano. His other characters are merely protagonists, people who do not even so much as have things happen to them as observe that things happen. ...more

flag 10 likes · Like · see review

Apr 04, 2014 Natalie rated it it was amazing

My favorite Vonnegut. Epically dystopian--disturbingly relevant. Somehow it manages not to shove it's agenda down your throat but does gently haunt you.

flag 10 likes · Like · see review

Feb 24, 2018 Brierly added it · review of another edition

Shelves: reviewed

I started Player Piano twice in high school. Kurt Vonnegut is one of my favorite classic English class authors. Last year I read Welcome to the Monkey House over a period of months and really enjoyed it. Sure, there are dated references that root this book (and his other work) in the mid-twentieth century, but I can suspend my own perspective for a bit and enjoy this bit of fiction.

The novel is futuristic, dystopian, and all too possible; set in the New York manufacturing city of Ilium, Player P ...more

flag 11 likes · Like · see review

Apr 26, 2010 Nikki rated it it was amazing

Shelves: alt-history, fiction, read-in-2008

(written in 2008)
I’m always a fan of Vonnegut. I loved this book. What made it so fascinating (what makes all his books so fascinating actually) was that pieces of it were eerily close to the attitude of the world today. Every once and a while something would be familiar enough to make you think that perhaps this world isn’t so far off. And that is a scary thought. Makes you honestly wonder what mankind is capable of. How much freedom are we willing to give up for security? What are we willing t ...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Nov 21, 2008 Ryan Hansen rated it really liked it

It's pretty amazing that Vonnegut could write so brilliantly about a technological backlash in a computerized society well before the age of the PC and the internet. Besides the fact that vacuum tubes are considered high tech in this book, it could have been written yesterday. You know, if he hadn't died. I didn't love the way the book wrapped up, but I'll cut him some slack since it was his first.

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Aug 09, 2018 Jason Pettus rated it liked it

Shelves: late-modernism, sci-fi, classic

THE GREAT COMPLETIST CHALLENGE: In which I revisit older authors and attempt to read every book they ever wrote

Currently in the challenge: Margaret Atwood | Christopher Buckley | Daphne Du Maurier | Michel Houellebecq | John Irving | Kazuo Ishiguro | Shirley Jackson | Bernard Malamud | Tim Powers | Philip Roth | John Updike | Kurt Vonnegut

Although I read a handful of Kurt Vonnegut's '80s novels back when I was in college, almost thirty years ago now, this year will be the first time I've ever at THE GREAT COMPLETIST CHALLENGE: In which I revisit older authors and attempt to read every book they ever wrote

Currently in the challenge: Margaret Atwood | Christopher Buckley | Daphne Du Maurier | Michel Houellebecq | John Irving | Kazuo Ishiguro | Shirley Jackson | Bernard Malamud | Tim Powers | Philip Roth | John Updike | Kurt Vonnegut

Although I read a handful of Kurt Vonnegut's '80s novels back when I was in college, almost thirty years ago now, this year will be the first time I've ever attempted to either read him comprehensively, read his really early works, or even learn more about him and his career history; and so that made it a big surprise last week to read his Wikipedia page for the first time and realize that he was actually considered a mid-tier Silver Age science-fiction author for the first five books of his career, all the way up to his 1969 breakout hit Slaughterhouse-Five. So in other words, not an Isaac Asimov but more a Frederik Pohl, with books that were loved by hardcore genre obsessives but that never really made a dent with the general public.

This is very clearly on display in his first-ever novel, 1952's Player Piano, which is shocking in hindsight precisely for what a so-so book it actually is, and how conventionally written it is, given how famous Vonnegut eventually became for both his unusual writing style and the high quality of his concepts. Ironically, the speculative novel is about a "world of the future" that has largely come to actually pass by 2018 -- an America where not only have most industrial and factory jobs been automated and are now run by robots, but even most white-collar jobs like writers, accountants and secretaries, Vonnegut envisioning a crazy far-future when computers can do things like (gasp!) catch typos in memos and automate tax preparation. In Vonnegut's world, pretty much the only humans left with actual jobs are computer engineers and their managers, eerily predicting the actual state of Silicon Valley in the 21st century; and while the rest of the country is still well taken care of, due to the socialized basic income that all this automation can now afford, it's left the US in a state of violent despondency over most people now no longer knowing their "purpose" in life, most former blue-collar workers now throwing themselves into their fraternal organizations like the Elks and the Rotary Club with a kind of zeal that has turned them almost into weaponized religious cults.

The novel is mostly notable now for the ways that Vonnegut correctly predicted much of the technology that would pass in the 65 years between then and now, even while badly misjudging what kind of effect this technology would have on society at large; he pictures this sea change in technology happening in a sociological bubble that completely stands still, leading to a shell-shocked populace who are utterly unequipped to adapt themselves to their rapidly changing times, while in reality over the last 65 years we've seen an America that has largely been able to successfully change its outlook and educational options to adapt to this rise in technological automation, giving us a contemporary US in 2018 that by and large is much wealthier and better-working than the barely functioning dystopia Vonnegut imagines in his book. (Also glaringly obvious to modern readers, Vonnegut's complete and total inability to predict in 1952 the rise of creative industries to replace all the factory workers and administrative peons of his own times -- designers, marketers, TV and film producers, craft artists, small business owners, "user experience" experts, basically all the modern job types that get lumped into the catch-all term "creative class.")

That makes the book problematic for contemporary readers, because it's hard to get over the schism here of Vonnegut describing a world that technologically works much like our real world does, but that in his case produces an Orwellian nightmare of a society that is perpetually on the brink of an ideologically based violent revolution; and like mentioned before, this is then compounded by the fact that his writing style here is barely above serviceable, a book that reads and feels exactly like the genteel Mid-Century Modernist relic that it actually is. According to his Wikipedia page, Vonnegut didn't develop his now iconic "Vonnegutian style" of writing until 1973's Breakfast of Champions, which apparently was the result of a nervous breakdown and an erroneous belief that that book was going to be the last of his career (but more on all this when we reach it); so while I work my way up to that point, I'm going to keep my expectations low for these more straightforward sci-fi novels from the start of his career, advice that I recommend to others as well who are making their way through his early books. Although I'm glad I now have it under my belt, I can't honestly say that I will ever take on Player Piano again, a reading experience that mostly left me anxious to get to Vonnegut's mature classics from later in his career. ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

May 06, 2016 Aloke rated it liked it

Shelves: scifi, fiction

Despite its science fiction trappings this is really a fun house look at the present. Writing in 1952, Vonnegut depicts a world where automation has rendered most jobs obsolete except for a small cadre of managers and engineers who administer the factories and create new machines. Those put out of their jobs are provided a safety net of medical care, housing, income, etc. but deprived of meaningful work they are resentful of the status quo. Of course this sounds prescient today with threats of A Despite its science fiction trappings this is really a fun house look at the present. Writing in 1952, Vonnegut depicts a world where automation has rendered most jobs obsolete except for a small cadre of managers and engineers who administer the factories and create new machines. Those put out of their jobs are provided a safety net of medical care, housing, income, etc. but deprived of meaningful work they are resentful of the status quo. Of course this sounds prescient today with threats of AI takeover and presidential candidates lamenting jobs lost to China.

But really it's always been that way. Vonnegut knows that. He takes shots at all sides. But he's definitely tougher on "progress". It's a useful corrective. Growth has its costs. Beware executives holding team building activities. The problem is that a lot of those points are dulled by being buried in lectures masquerading as dialogue. The jokes often fall flat. He hits his stride in the second half and you can see the absurdist outlines of his later work in there.

In the "what they got wrong" department: in the far future it's still the 50s as far as women are concerned, Pittsburgh as the center of the the US economy and an outsize role in society for fraternal organizations: as Charles Murray points out in "Coming Apart" most Americans don't belong to them these days.

Some quotes:

“Well, what the heck,” said Buck. “I mean, they aren’t people. They don’t suffer. They don’t mind working.” “No. But they compete with people.” “That’s a pretty good thing, isn’t it—considering what a sloppy job most people do of anything?” “Anybody that competes with slaves becomes a slave,” said Harrison thickly, and he left.

----

“All right,” said Lasher, his voice low. “In the past, in a situation like this, if Messiahs showed up with credible, dramatic messages of hope, they often set off powerful physical and spiritual revolutions in the face of terrific odds. If a Messiah shows up now with a good, solid, startling message, and if he keeps out of the hands of the police, he can set off a revolution—maybe one big enough to take the world away from the machines, Doctor, and give it back to the people.” ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Oct 30, 2014 Chris Dietzel rated it really liked it

In reading this I was surprised to find a book that wasn't filled with Vonnegut's usual sarcasm and absurdity (in a good way). Then I realized this was his first book and that he was still probably finding his voice as a writer when he wrote it. Instead of relying solely on comical misunderstandings and dialogue, you find a more genuine story of people struggling to find a purpose in an unhappy world. Although nothing for me will ever match 'Slaughterhouse-Five,' I enjoyed this more than books l ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Kayıp Rıhtım: KR Kitap Kulübü #2 Kurt Vonnegut - Otomatik Piyano	1	7	Jan 19, 2019 04:13PM
Mentor Texts: Mentor Texts	1	2	Dec 11, 2017 08:32PM
Escape The Earth!: 2016: Player Piano	2	5	Mar 15, 2016 09:51AM
Book Club: Extension	3	11	Jun 21, 2013 08:23PM
Book Club: Anita	1	22	Jun 20, 2013 07:58PM
Technoloy Growth	4	39	May 08, 2013 01:54PM

Readers Also Enjoyed

Genres

Fiction

1,116 users

Science Fiction

521 users

Science Fiction > Dystopia

214 users

Classics

209 users

See top shelves…

About Kurt Vonnegut

Kurt Vonnegut

23,801 followers

Kurt Vonnegut, Junior was an American novelist, satirist, and most recently, graphic artist. He was recognized as New York State Author for 2001-2003.

He was born in Indianapolis, later the setting for many of his novels. He attended Cornell University from 1941 to 1943, where he wrote a column for the student newspaper, the Cornell Daily Sun. Vonnegut trained as a chemist and worked as a journali ...more