Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Art of Rhetoric” as Want to Read:
The Art of Rhetoric
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Art of Rhetoric

by
3.88  ·  Rating details ·  3,684 ratings  ·  155 reviews
Few, if any, writers in history have made major contributions to as many fields of knowledge as Aristotle...

'If there are two definitive features of ancient Greek civilization,' writes Hugh Lawson-Tancred in his wide-ranging Introduction, 'they are articulacy and competition.' In the city-states oratorical competence was an essential asset for politicians in the Assemblies

...more
Paperback, 304 pages
Published October 31st 1991 by Penguin Classics (first published -322)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Art of Rhetoric, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Art of Rhetoric

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Matt
Jul 19, 2010 rated it it was ok
Aristotle defines. Unmercifully. And The Art of Rhetoric is no exception. Aristotle disdained the sophist tradition of ancient Greece as much as Plato, but he also understood that rhetoric was a popular study of the day and it became another discipline he sought to master. With a scientific eye and a mind toward philosophical value, Aristotle studied rhetoric as “the power to observe the persuasiveness of which any particular matter admits” (pg. 74; Ch. 1.2). Rhetoric, when used appropriately, b ...more
Paul
Not Aristotle's clearest or best organized work, but still part of the core curriculum of a liberal education.

Why read Aristotle today? Because he is one of the greatest minds in Western history, and such a person's well-considered thoughts are inherently worth reading, if anything is.

In addition, this book was deliberately aimed at those seeking to play an active role in a democratic society, to help them fulfill their function as citizens of a free society. We in the West imagine ourselves (mo
...more
Alp Turgut
Aristoteles'in Platon'un "Gorgias"da bahsettiği Retorik kavramını bir üst seviyeye taşıdığı eseri "The Art of Rhetoric / Retorik", insani tutumlara dair mükemmele yakın tanımlamarıyla adeta bir hayat sözlüğü niteliğinde. Kıskançlık, kibir, gurur, hırs, yaşlılık, gençlik gibi bir sürü kavramın açıklamalarını okuma şansı bulduğumuz eserde özellikle ilk iki kitabı okurken ünlü filozofun zekasına ve gözlemlerine hayran kalıyorsunuz. Öte yandan, eğretileme ve konuşma tekniklerinden bahsettiği daha ço ...more
Paul Haspel
You may never have read anything by Aristotle; but if you've ever taken a college writing course, you've had him as your teacher. The Art of Rhetoric did so much to define how subsequent generations, and civilizations, regarded the task of crafting persuasive language that it can truly be regarded as a founding text. Methodically, Aristotle sets forth his sense of how the writer's handling of character and emotion contributes to success in rhetorical terms. His insights regarding style and compo ...more
Jesse Broussard
Apr 19, 2008 rated it it was ok
Shelves: mediocre
I'm sure it's excellent, necessary, brilliantly designed, etc. But so is a sewer system, and you don't want to spend too much time there either.
Eric
Feb 03, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The first book of Aristotle’s highly taxonomical Rhetoric opens with a parsing of dialectic and rhetoric. He sets up the latter as an art of persuasion related to but nevertheless distinguishable from the former. After exploring the usefulness of syllogisms and enthymemes for both arts, Aristotle sets out his three basic categories of rhetorical discourse: deliberative, judicial (or forensic), and epideictic. He spends the rest of the first book exploring topics (related to the Greek topos, for ...more
Abdullah Başaran
Sep 09, 2017 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
[Warning: Translation disaster]

Çeviri (Mehmet Dogan, YKY) çok fena. Eyvah eyvah. Zaten ingiliççeden, neden bilmiyorum. Hayir yani neden bu kadar kötü bi çeviriyle Aristo okunmak zorunda kalinmis ki? Bu yüzden 1. Yoksa ne haddime canim Üstâd Aristû'ya bu puani vermek.

Bunun disinda, bilhassa ikinci bölüm çok önemli. Çok detayli bir duygular epistemolojisi. De Anima ve etik kitaplarindaki duygular ve hisler nazariyelerine paralel okumalar yapilabilir. Hatta daha öteye geçilerek Platon'la, Cicero ve
...more
Josiah
Dec 11, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: education, philosophy
The only rhetoric textbook a classical school should ever need (I exaggerate slightly... but not much). Aristotle's Art of Rhetoric has everything. And it's all brilliant. I've been using this (Book I particularly) as my 11th grade writing curriculum this year, and it's amazing. This translation (Waterfield) in particular is much easier for my students to grasp than other translations out there, and it doesn't take much to turn his advice here into a series of really practical writing assignment ...more
Alex
Aug 24, 2017 rated it liked it
Don't be put off by the rating. Worth a read.
Carmen
Sep 09, 2008 rated it it was ok
Shelves: education
I need an Idiot's Guide type book to help me with this one because this is just not sinking in. Perhaps I need to reread it. ehh. I'm not really a fan of rhetoric to begin with but this is certainly the book for orators, politicians, and lawyers to be. Proof, proof, proof, make sure you can back up what you say, but when you don't have proof, at least say it with style and panache, that's half the battle. An interesting read during election season.

One of the most interesting moments in this boo
...more
Scott
Feb 26, 2010 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is obviously a classic to the field of rhetoric. It also contains what is essentially the first treatise on human psychology, in addition to systematically analyzing the art of persuasion.

I have never read any other editions of this book, but I would recommend this edition to everyone who wants to read it. George Kennedy's translation and his commentary are incredibly helpful, even amusing at times. His sheer knowledge of Aristotle and this work (he must have spent decades on it) is st
...more
G.M. Burrow
Read this when I barely knew what "rhetoric" meant. So I should sift through it again.
Daniel Gonçalves
Apr 22, 2015 rated it really liked it
Lido para a disciplina de retórica, obviamente. Um marco na história da civilização.
Gastjäle
Sep 23, 2018 rated it liked it
The relevance of this book is mind-boggling. It's easy to draw a plethora of parallels from the enumerated rhetorical devices and tips of Aristotle to the modern orators, both public and private. Aristotle was clearly an honest man, for an ignoble cad would hardly have shared all their secrets for public success as openly and thoroughly as the ol' Greek master.

Yet, in spite of his honesty, he acknowledges the inherent dishonesty of the art of rhetoric. This art does not deal with facts and trut
...more
Martin Hassman
Kniha mi vůbec nesedla. Asi to bylo kombinací více faktorů.
- Překladem do archaické češtiny - z akademického pohledu to je asi ocenitelné, ale špatně se mi četla.
- Nedostatečnou znalostí reálií antického Řecka. Odkazuje se na ně neustále, ztrácel jsem se v tom.
- Přístupem k tématu. Co jsem hledal, že autor řekne k tématu by zabralo asi jen desetinu knihu, zbytek byla pro mě "vata" okolo.

Ve výsledku bych si radši přečetl předžvýkaný výtah, který přinese zajímavé myšlenky autora současnému čtenáři
...more
Alexkidd117
Aug 05, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Very interesting book of one the masters of western philosophy. Well written, this short book is a useful anatomy of rhetoric. We find a wise advises to deliver a speech and convince an assembly. I do not give 5 stars because we don't have more direct advises, or maybe it is just my contemporary expectations for a book of self-improvement.
Anna
Dec 13, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: philosophy, classics
Overall, I found the book messy and terrible structured. Not the best I've read from Aristotle.
Daniel Gargallo
Mar 27, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: classics
A translation is mainly an analogue to another text. This edition presents a direct analogue that, to the layman, doesn’t arouse any suspicions of misrepresentation in the text, and sustaining that particular suspension of disbelief is the measure of any translator's work.

I was totally content with this specific publication, but my interests were to read it once and be done with it. This is an unglamorous edition and I wouldn’t give it to your daughter’s boyfriend for Christmas.

As a speechwrit
...more
James
Feb 09, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
While this is a book about rhetoric the broad definition that is used by Aristotle allows for excursions into philosophy, government, history, ethics, and literature. Thus when discussing the proper organization of a speech Aristotle draws on literary examples from Homer and Herodotus to Sophocles. No one can deny the strength of Antigone's argument when she says, "But when mother and father have gone to Hades there is no brother who can be born again".(p 271)
The work is difficult for Aristotle
...more
Eric McLean
There is a lot of good stuff here (obviously-it's Aristotle, man!) and it almost feels wrong not giving this 5 stars, but alas...I just didn't find all of it very interesting. I struggled to finish this, mostly because there were some great points on rhetoric surrounded by mountains of definitions that don't really seem to define rhetoric as it is today. I'm sure there are some more modern texts that get at the same ideas in a more modern context-but we all owe a lot of that to Aristotle.

Anyway,
...more
Brittany Petruzzi
I cleared my one-star rating for being a purely subjective impression as a college freshman. Never have I read a more unpersuasive and engaging treatment of the art of persuasion. Perhaps I would have found it more so with a better translation? Someday I may pick up a Sachs translation and give it another go.
Will Mego
Mar 15, 2016 rated it did not like it
Shelves: read-in-2016
Don't throw things at me.

When I trudged through the dull translation of a section that proclaimed no value to a type of oration that I had just that evening used to great effect in a public political speech to a small audience, perhaps the years have been unkind, but I knew this wasn't going to be of great use to me. Times change, and sophistry is a fact. Wishing it away changes nothing.
Rhonda
Apr 21, 2011 rated it really liked it
I am glad to be reminded of this wonderful book, although I read it some time ago. It is effectively practical advice in nature which perhaps I did not completely appreciate at the time. Perhaps it is time to read it again.
Yann
Jul 21, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Je me suis régalé avec Aristote.
sologdin
Jun 11, 2011 rated it it was ok
aristocrats must talk pretty to keep the peasants in line.
Michael de Percy
Jul 02, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: read-reviewed
Some of this book reads like a manual for living with what seem to be the simplest instructions imaginable. Wake up, lift the cover, put your feet on the floor, stand up, go to the bathroom, etc. Yet when one thinks about this being some of the earliest writings in recorded history, this instruction manual in how to be persuasive in speech and in writing states exactly what we teach our university students today. And therein lies the simplicity that belies its brilliance. This is my first cover- ...more
J. Alfred
Nov 23, 2016 rated it it was ok
Aristotle is one of those guys that you know is a seminal influence on the whole of civilization, and yet seems to have gotten there by saying all the obvious things. (Somebody had to do it!) The man is clearly brilliant, but not quite congenial to modern taste, if I'm any judge. Case in point: a treatise on rhetoric-- that is, the art of speaking well-- should not, I submit, be impossibly labored, irritatingly imprecise in terminology, and totally unmemorable, and yet this seems to be.
Ahem: "e
...more
Nikolaj Laustsen
Argument Forensics

The work is a bit disorganized, and you pile between the points in a way that make it difficult to follow.

But it is excellent with an introduction from the creator of the work on rhetoric, the book has been widely used in teaching communications, but the ideas here give a good insight into the origin of rhetoric and argumentation technique.

I give the book a 4-star rating, because i think there is something to be learned, witch is not given in other books on the subject. The la
...more
David Mytton
The first 20% of the book is a commentary from the translator which helps to set the scene for the main body of work. This was a useful introduction but I thought that some of it should have come after the main text as an explanation of what the reader just read, rather than what is about to be read.

I found the most interesting and useful aspects of Aristotle's work to be the final couple of chapters on style and form. The rest of the text seems to be more about providing definitions, which I su
...more
Zachary Rudolph
Dec 31, 2016 rated it liked it
“Sweet-natured through their not having yet observed much wickedness, and credulous through their not yet having been many times deceived, and optimistic ... because they have not frequently met with failure. And for the most part they live in hope; for hope is of the future and remembrance of the past, and for the young the future is long and the past short; for on one’s first day one can remember nothing but hope for everything. And they are easily deceived for the reason given (that they easi ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Book Groups 2 8 Dec 02, 2012 01:53PM  
Reading Rocks!: Why is it important to analyze the "moves" writers make? 115 259 Oct 25, 2012 07:07AM  
Brain Pain: Aristotle - The Art of Rhetoric - Discussion 1 51 Nov 26, 2011 10:45AM  
  • Rhetorica ad Herennium
  • Phaedrus
  • Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student
  • Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Vol 1, Books 1-5
  • A Rhetoric of Motives
  • Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus.
  • History of the Peloponnesian War: Bk. 1-2
  • The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present
  • A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms
  • Outlines of Scepticism
  • The Plays and Fragments
  • Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students
  • Discourses, Books 1-2
  • The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
2,631 followers
(Greece: Αριστοτέλης)
(Arabic: أرسطوطاليس)
(Bulgarian: Аристотел)
(Russian: Аристотель)
(Ukrainian: Арістотель)
(Alternate European spelling: Aristoteles)


Aristotle (384–322 B.C.) numbers among the greatest philosophers of all time. Judged solely in terms of his philosophical influence, only Plato is his peer: Aristotle's works shaped centuries of philosophy from Late Antiquity through the Renaissance,
...more
“What makes a man a 'sophist' is not his faculty, but his moral purpose. (1355b 17)” 11 likes
“If there are two definitive features of ancient Greek civilization, they are loquacity and competition.” 3 likes
More quotes…