730 books
—
1,134 voters
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “In the Next Room, or the vibrator play” as Want to Read:
In the Next Room, or the vibrator play
by
In the Next Room or the vibrator play is a comedy about marriage, intimacy, and electricity. Set in the 1880s at the dawn of the age of electricity and based on the bizarre historical fact that doctors used vibrators to treat 'hysterical' women (and some men), the play centers on a doctor and his wife and how his new therapy affects their entire household. In a seemingly
...more
Get A Copy
Paperback, 90 pages
Published
June 18th 2010
by Samuel French, Inc.
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
In the Next Room, or the vibrator play,
please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about In the Next Room, or the vibrator play
Community Reviews
Showing 1-30

Start your review of In the Next Room, or the vibrator play

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.

This play made me realize that reading and reviewing plays is a more difficult proposition than I had imagined. The playwrights I've read and loved—Tom Stoppard, Jen Silverman, Martin McDonagh—all have a wit and lyricism that is easily seen on the page. But there are other playwrights whose skill resides not in any kind of poetic razzle-dazzle, but more in opening up a space onstage for the actors and designers to create something beautiful in their own right.
I think maybe Sarah Ruhl is one of ...more
I think maybe Sarah Ruhl is one of ...more

Oct 10, 2019
Linds
rated it
it was amazing
Shelves:
historical-fiction,
oppression,
1800-s,
plays,
victorian,
feminism,
read-in-2019,
5-star-read-in-2019
A weird, funny, and surprisingly sweet play.

The main reason I read this play now is that I am going to try and make the trip to see it performed at Shepherd University in November.
The play is really interesting, set at the dawn of electricity and during a time when psychology was both early and heavily gender biased. There are too many fascinating theoretical issues at work in the play to do justice to all of them, but some are: gender issues manifested in types of authorities over space, power, and knowledge; racial issues and implicit ...more
The play is really interesting, set at the dawn of electricity and during a time when psychology was both early and heavily gender biased. There are too many fascinating theoretical issues at work in the play to do justice to all of them, but some are: gender issues manifested in types of authorities over space, power, and knowledge; racial issues and implicit ...more

Man, Sarah Ruhl is a playwright from heaven. You know a play is spectacular when it's as engrossing to read it as it would be to see it on stage! She pumps her succinct, witty, salient, and entertaining work full of heart and intelligence. This one would be especially excellent in the theater because it relies on simultaneous and alternating action in the living room and "the next room," but as reading material it also moves like a, er, modern-day vibrator? Speaking of, it gave me a deeper
...more

Sarah Ruhl explores female empowerment and sexuality in the age of the dawn of electricity in the play, In the Next Room, or the vibrator play. Based on a true story, Dr. Givings has begun treating women suffering from "hysteria" using a vibrator to bring them to orgasm, thus releasing them from whatever was blocking them from feeling emotion and living full, sexual lives to satisfy their husbands. When Mrs. Givings grows curious about the treatment and longs to experience it for herself, the
...more

I did it, I read a play! The only other play I've willingly read was Harry Potter and the Cursed Child: Parts One and Two, so this was out of my comfort zone. But I really want to complete the Reading Women challenge and this checks off #8 on the list. Of course I picked a play about sex and vibrators.
It was actually really fascinating, and somehow the stage directions and structure of the set (two rooms in which action happens simultaneously) came off really well on the page.
It was actually really fascinating, and somehow the stage directions and structure of the set (two rooms in which action happens simultaneously) came off really well on the page.

Dec 01, 2018
Sara
added it
Loved!

What a play. Two rooms next to one another. In one, a doctor uses a vibrator to treat women dealing with hysteria (this, apparently, was a real medical practice in the 1880’s); in the next room, the doctor’s wife deals with a newborn.
This is a fascinating look at marriage and desire and giving into pleasure. I would love to see a production of this one.
This is a fascinating look at marriage and desire and giving into pleasure. I would love to see a production of this one.

5 Stars.
Set in late 19th-century doctor's home and office.
Dramatization of a raucous funny solution-- the over-sized electric-powered doctor-applied vibrator--to a age-old sexual problem: Hysteria.
Why is the doctor's wife standing at the door of the other room, her husband's office? What does she realize? What will she do?
After reading this play, I ordered more plays by Sarah Ruhl. This writer has knocked my socks off. I plan to read 2 or 3 in early November,
Set in late 19th-century doctor's home and office.
Dramatization of a raucous funny solution-- the over-sized electric-powered doctor-applied vibrator--to a age-old sexual problem: Hysteria.
Why is the doctor's wife standing at the door of the other room, her husband's office? What does she realize? What will she do?
After reading this play, I ordered more plays by Sarah Ruhl. This writer has knocked my socks off. I plan to read 2 or 3 in early November,

I love love love love love love this play!!!! It’s like if A Dolls House met The Importance of Being Earnest but with an avant-garde feel and way more sexual overtones. The themes of love and female agency were wonderful and I loved the development and portrayal of the characters. It was poignant and charming and the end left me so extremely happy. 10/10 recommend this play!!!

This is a wonderful play to be read in tandem with The Yellow Wallpaper. I'm generally not a fan of reading plays--I want to see them performed--but I did very much enjoy reading this. This probably mostly due to the fact that I find women's sexuality, especially in this time period, fascinating. Read this play and then watch an episode of a Girls, and see how far (and not far) we've come....no pun intended.

I feel like the shock factor is what really makes Sarah Ruhl's play enjoyable. Don't get me wrong: I enjoyed the writing and a lot of the play devices. But in the end, the play is very .... lite. It prods some sensitive areas but mostly just reassures the sensibilities of the audience that we are so lucky to come as far as we have. Ain't that grand?

Very interesting. I knew the fact of how "hysterical" women used to be "treated" so the play didn't teach me anything new, but it is a well fleshed exploration of this historical fact. Still, this play's main theme is about how we humans get love, in all its facets, so wrong and so right. I'd be interested to know how it plays on stage. Seems it would be poignantly funny (is that possible?).

Nov 16, 2014
Paul
rated it
it was amazing
Recommends it for:
People who: considered themselves feminists (and you really, really should).
A theatrical piece entirely devoted to women embracing their own sexuality, disregarding/outright rejecting patriarchal claims to their bodies, and falling in love with one another in direct contradiction with the heteronormative societal expectations of the time? With a healthy dose of humor sprinkled throughout for good measure?
Sign me up.
Sign me up.

Much better to watch than to read
Now that I have read this book, (Kindle edition) and seen the play, I am ready render my thoughts.
In short from: this is a much better play to watch than it is to read. Nowhere in the text is the pointed wit of an Oscar Wilde or the deep sophistication of a Tom Stoppard. The words are simple and as a read it is somewhat limp. As a performance, these problem disappear.
Sarah Ruhl's play takes place in two rooms, sometimes simultaneously. Mostly we are in the front ...more
Now that I have read this book, (Kindle edition) and seen the play, I am ready render my thoughts.
In short from: this is a much better play to watch than it is to read. Nowhere in the text is the pointed wit of an Oscar Wilde or the deep sophistication of a Tom Stoppard. The words are simple and as a read it is somewhat limp. As a performance, these problem disappear.
Sarah Ruhl's play takes place in two rooms, sometimes simultaneously. Mostly we are in the front ...more

A few generalizations about contemporary American drama, based on a casual read of 3 contemporary American plays, by Jack W., theatre expert:
1. Contemporary American drama is good! It's not this pit of navel gazing nothingness (see: a whole lot of other contemporary American art forms)! It's a place where you can be entertained! Wow!
2. Contemporary American drama is smart! Modern playwrights have found ways to incorporate "ideas" into plays that feel organic and complex! (Unlike the ideas in ...more
1. Contemporary American drama is good! It's not this pit of navel gazing nothingness (see: a whole lot of other contemporary American art forms)! It's a place where you can be entertained! Wow!
2. Contemporary American drama is smart! Modern playwrights have found ways to incorporate "ideas" into plays that feel organic and complex! (Unlike the ideas in ...more

I haven't read a contemporary (non-Greek classic) play since that last time I was in one, which was 2007. And even then, that was the only non-Shakespearean play I had ever read. So, I have nothing to compare this to, but I did enjoy this, and it was a good intro to a new genre for me.
I first heard of this play during the Tony awards several years ago, when I, like everyone else probably, giggled at the name. At that time I had no idea what it was about, and I didn't until I decided to read it. ...more
I first heard of this play during the Tony awards several years ago, when I, like everyone else probably, giggled at the name. At that time I had no idea what it was about, and I didn't until I decided to read it. ...more

A comedy that touches on male/female dynamics, 19th century sexuality and technology, race, and feminism.
As much as this is a comedy, I think it's also a tragedy in the way that the characters are unable to communicate what it is that really bothers them, nor can they articulate what they want. The ending works out somewhat, so the tragedy doesn't stick arounduntil the end, but I think the historical lens works twofold.
First, we learn a bit about how "hysteria" was treated, which seems ...more
As much as this is a comedy, I think it's also a tragedy in the way that the characters are unable to communicate what it is that really bothers them, nor can they articulate what they want. The ending works out somewhat, so the tragedy doesn't stick arounduntil the end, but I think the historical lens works twofold.
First, we learn a bit about how "hysteria" was treated, which seems ...more

I'm very conflicted with this review. I did see it performed and I'm still detaching which parts of it I didn't like because of the way the show was staged or because of how it was written. Let's see if we can figure this sh** out.
In the Next Room (or the vibrator play) follows the Mrs. Givings as she struggles a loving relationship with her husband, feeling satisfied with her child, and even with electricity- in some regards. Sarah Ruhl manages to write a feminist piece that communicates a ...more
In the Next Room (or the vibrator play) follows the Mrs. Givings as she struggles a loving relationship with her husband, feeling satisfied with her child, and even with electricity- in some regards. Sarah Ruhl manages to write a feminist piece that communicates a ...more

This was certainly an interesring read. The subject matter has been addressed more of late thanks to shows like Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries. I think it is important that we explore these kinds of ideas and have open conversations about it. There were definitely some funny moments and I think it would be entertaining to see it live. I am just unsure if the ending provided a resolution for all the characters. Maybe it's just my modern sensibilities, but the ending was a bit problematic. I felt
...more

REREAD. Absolutely hilarious. All throughout the play the dialogue seemed disjointed at times, difficult to follow everyone's train of thought. Almost awkward, but in a way completely separate from the subject matter. Despite that, it really was a fun read, as I had zipped through it the first time for my drama class. This time I got to savor it, and got to know the characters and their personalities (except for Leo... I could never figure him out, though that was probably the point!).
...more

The idea is really smart: using the victorian era to discuss women and sex today? but the plot and the characters take so damn long to develop and as soon as everything unravels the play is over.. 2010 pulitzer prize finalist? oof. i mean the play is funny sometimes and sarah ruhl is a good writer but this isnt the best work?

One of the most amazing plays I’ve read in a while - the language is so beautiful, each line bursting with drama. The language is spare, but not sterile. Everybody has a distinct way of speaking - the Doctor and his clinical/scientific language, Catherine Givings and her tendency to babble, Leo and his writerly/artistic language and imagery.
Reading Sarah Ruhl is a master class in playwriting.
Reading Sarah Ruhl is a master class in playwriting.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Sarah Ruhl (born 1974) is an American playwright. She is the recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship and the PEN/Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater Award for a distinguished American playwright in mid-career.
Originally, she intended to be a poet. However, after she studied under Paula Vogel at Brown University (A.B., 1997; M.F.A., 2001), she was persuaded to switch to playwriting. Her ...more
Originally, she intended to be a poet. However, after she studied under Paula Vogel at Brown University (A.B., 1997; M.F.A., 2001), she was persuaded to switch to playwriting. Her ...more
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »
“Do you not think, Mrs. Givings, that snow is always kind? Because it has to fall slowly, to meet the ground slowly, or the eyelash slowly— And things that meet each other slowly are kind.”
—
5 likes
“Do you think we make sad things into songs in order to hold on to the sadness or to banish it—I think it is to banish the sadness. So then if you write a happy song, is it not sadder than a sad song because by making it you have banished your own happiness into a song?”
—
3 likes
More quotes…