Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” as Want to Read:
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Read Book* *Different edition

An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations

3.85  ·  Rating details ·  30,448 ratings  ·  1,009 reviews
Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations was recognized as a landmark of human thought upon its publication in 1776. As the first scientific argument for the principles of political economy, it is the point of departure for all subsequent economic thought. Smith's theories of capital accumulation, growth, and secular change, among others, continue to be influential in modern ...more
Paperback, 1152 pages
Published February 15th 1977 by University of Chicago Press (first published 1776)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Popular Answered Questions
Spencer Gray The book that gave birth to classic economics. Whether you're for or against capitalism you can't discount this in depth look at one of the most…moreThe book that gave birth to classic economics. Whether you're for or against capitalism you can't discount this in depth look at one of the most influential economic theories of all time. This book rivals Das Capital in influence and stands the test of time as it remains more relevant than Marxist theory to modern economics. (less)
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.85  · 
Rating details
 ·  30,448 ratings  ·  1,009 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
May 07, 2012 marked it as intermittently-reading  ·  review of another edition
Sometimes I feel so very goddamned embarrassed by my lack of higher education. There are just too many of the foundational works of Western civilization that I am only getting around to now, in my early fortiesand even with the padding of years, I feel depressingly unprepared heading into them. So much fucking time wasted doing shit, when I could have been reading...

Smith is smooth, like a nice rye whisky. Right off the bat, this artful Adam opens with a remark about the productive powers of
Apr 17, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: economics
For a truth, about 3/4 of this book is 18th century blabber about corn prices. Of the remaining 1/4, about 1/2 is criticism of mercantilsm, which is mostly obvious and definitely boring.

The remaining 1/8 of the book, however, is worth fighting through the rest for. Even if you've heard the explanation of the "invisible hand" a thousand times, there is something magical about reading the actual words by the father himself:

"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker
Ahmad Sharabiani
The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith

An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, generally referred to by its shortened title The Wealth of Nations, is the magnum opus of the Scottish economist and moral philosopher Adam Smith. First published in 1776.

The book offers one of the world's first collected descriptions of what builds nations' wealth, and is today a fundamental work in classical economics. By reflecting upon the economics at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution,
Richard Fulgham
Apr 19, 2009 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: swine, hyenas and robber barons
"The Wealth of Nations" is the book that changed greed to a virtue instead of a sin.

In fact, greed is one of the Seven Deadly Sins in Christian theology. Greed is a sin in ALL the great religions, including Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Zen Buddhism, Buddhism, American Indian Spiritualism, Wiccan nature love, Bahá'í Faith, Gnosticism Rastafari,Samaritanism, Indian Ayyavazhi, Jainism, Sikhism Iranian Ahl-e Haqq, Manichaeism, Mazdak, Yazidi,Zoroastrianism, East Asian Confucianism, Taoism,Recent Cao
Jon Nakapalau
One of the hardest books I have ever read - I feel overwhelmed as far as the concepts - so I will just make a general comment: If you want to understand the foundational concepts of economic policy and have the perspective of a true genius then this book is for you. It is SCARY how many situations Adam Smith predicted - and it is sad how little things have changed as far as the wealthy and the poor. If you read this book and Das Capital I would argue that you will be able to hold your own as far ...more
Erik Graff
May 16, 2008 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Recommended to Erik by: Evelyn Wood
A prideful and ambitious boy, hearing that President Kennedy had been a speed reader, I cut lawns and shovelled walks to pay for an Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics program. We met in the spare basement of the hideous modern structure that passed for Park Ridge's "Inn"--a residence primarily for attendants and pilots from the airlines utilizing nearby O'Hare International Airport. I was a sophomore, the youngest in class, quite serious and full of myself.

The Wood method consisted, basically, of two
Aug 27, 2014 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
For some reason, the American Right tend to be as vehemently in favor of the Invisible Hand of the market as they are vehemently against the Invisible Hand of Darwinian selection. And the old USSR was exactly the same, except that they reversed the two positions.

Am I the only person who thinks this is just plain weird?
Saadia B. || CritiConscience
Oh this book was such a tiresome read that I finished 4 other books before completing this one.

Started to take toll on me with so much unnecessary explanations which made no sense. Sometimes cringe worthy!

Adam Smith was one of the few individuals who wanted the economic cycle to run itself. Hence he was in full support of market setting the momentum. But can we give such liberty to markets? With inflation, resources cramped within few hands and power politics his notion have failed to a large
Apr 24, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone.
Recommended to Anne by: I'm not going lie, I was forced to read it in American Nat'l Gov
Shelves: ethnographical
How can one go through life without reading the Wealth of Nations?

Adam Smith had the idea of modern economics before the United States was even sovereign (I go not so much for good writers, as I do for innovative and groundbreaking thinkers). Imagine coming up with your own idea of an economic system long before the world was ready. And unlike Marx, may I mention, Smith's ideals are not only flourishing and still seen today, but they are the foundation of the many, many economies and nations.
Update: I realized last night that I will never have a block of time uninterrupted by other books. I think I'm constitutionally incapable of reading only one book at a time. So I'm diving back into this one...actually restarting it...but with an unabridged edition this time. See you back here in a few months...or years.

This one requires a good deal of focus and a block of time uninterrupted by other books or major life events. I will get back to it, just not sure when.
Amit Mishra
Jan 01, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
An erudite who not only changed the shape of economics thinking but also laid the foundation of capitalism and industrialization. The book by him can be regarded as The Bible of economics.
Nov 13, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Always a great classic on economics. His one fatal flaw was opening the door for Marx. By placing value based on labor, laborers feel they are the ones that deserve all the reward. Labor means nothing if no one wants the item being produced. The free market drives price, not the amount of labor put into a product.

Great chance to see and understand how economics developed.
Mar 12, 2020 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
People suggesting I read Adam Smith for an understanding of economic is something I find disgusting and offensive. Adam Smith was man who defended the very system of his time which allowed children as young as four or five to be sent down mines or up chimneys to horrific deaths. , worked women to death and made it legal for the bosses to rape them whenever they liked!
Adam Smith and Ludwig von Mises were therefore evil to the core!
Oct 19, 2010 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Up there with the Bible as one of the most misquoted books of all time? I strongly suspect that most people who believe themselves to be disciples of Adam Smith have never actually read this book. Adam had no time for theoretical economic models and doctrinaire dog-eat-dog free market dogma. He was an empiricist and a moralist who believed people should be given the opportunity to make the best of themselves, but that the most vulnerable members of society should be taken care of by the group. ...more
The Duke
Feb 22, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A text that's still relevant (and its main points still taught). The Wealth of Nations is far from a short read, but I feel like it's main points are pretty easy to sum up and since when they have been put into practice we have seen the results intended, it has maintained its importance.

Basically it states that producers are better off investing in capital and labor (creating a division of labor) so each laborer only has to specialize in one task, thus creating a far more efficient output.
Jul 12, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Adam Smiths An Inquiry Into The Nature And Causes Of The Wealth Of Nations (often called simply The Wealth Of Nations) is one of two great works from the Scottish economist and philosopher, the other being the lesser known The Theory of Moral Sentiments. The Wealth Of Nations was published on March 9th, of 1776, but there were additional editions in 1778, 1784, 1786, and 1789. I read the free Kindle version of The Wealth Of Nations, and while I do not recommend that version I do recommend the ...more
11811 (Eleven)
This is a pillar of western civilization but not much fun so dont read it unless you have to. A Wiki should give you more information than you need to know. The 7 hour abridged Audible edition gave me more far more info than I needed or wanted. Thank God thats over. ...more
Emre Poyraz
I would say that this is the most overrated book in economics. That does not mean that this book is without its merits, but I was definitely frustrated. Let me tell you why:

1. Smith, in various places in the book, criticizes merchantilists and others. However, since the average reader (even the average economist) has no knowledge of merchantilists and physiocrats, all his comments SEEM correct, whereas in fact they are just simplistic and unfair (merchantilists never confused wealth and money,
4.0 stars. I read this on my own in law school. I know, I know, who does that right? Well I obtained this as part of my Easton Press colleciton of "Books That Changed the World." I remember being really intrigued by the book and it made me more interested in the history of economics.
Naia Pard
Sep 22, 2020 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
"Every tax, however, is to the person who pays it, a badge not of slavery, but of liberty. It denotes that he is subject to government, indeed; but that, as he has some property, he cannot himself be the property of a master." p.857 Madams et Messieurs, Adam Smith, the father of capitalism.

The first thing that intrigued me about this book (besides being the test of intelligence in one of the episodes of Killing Eve-seriously, at one point, Villanelle was disguised and the man in which home she
Feb 11, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I think everyone who claims to be a free market capitalist should read this book so as not to over-do it
Andrew Obrigewitsch
One of the first and most quoted economics books in history. I must say that many of the quotes that come from this book are cherry picked, for example the invisible hand is mentioned one time and a minor aside, yet I heard about it many times in school, yet heard nothing about many of the other subjects discussed at great length in this book.

If you are interest in economics or politics at all I recommend reading this book.
Breinholt Dorrough
The most influential book of all time. Every commodity and service we enjoy - from transportation to technology to cheaper metal production - has come because of those who have stood on the giant shoulders of Adam Smith.
Mohammad Ali Abedi
Money, says the proverb, makes money. When you have got a little, it is often easy to get more. The great difficulty is to get that little.

This book was absolutely a pain to get through. Maybe the biggest difference between 2012 and 1776 is that people have less patience. This economic book, seems to have made a huge influence on future economists and capitalists, but reading over 1000 pages on extremely dry economics was really difficult for me. There are some good ideas in the book, but
Nov 14, 2009 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
We know from experience that Smith's system is not complete unto itself. In fact, Smith himself would probably have admitted this. His references to ancient history and political philosophy would seem to show not only that he accepted that the territory of "statecraft" is not entirely contained within the borders of classical economics but also that he accepted the State's place alongside the Market as a fundamental, primordial feature of social existence.

That much being said, Smith deserves
Anna Merrill
Oct 28, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Keeping in mind this book was published in 1776, the same year the US was founded, and that it is written in the language of the time, this is a thorough examination of how patterns of trade, currency, and growth occur. The foundation upon which all other economics books are written.

Stick this book in your bathroom and read one of the short little 12-page chapters every time you pay an extended visit. At over 1000 pages, it will take a while, but if you want to teach yourself how to debunk the
Fabian {Councillor}
(Discussed parts of it in school, so I know about most of Smith's major ideas, but I never read the actual book except for some segments.)
Czarny Pies
May 25, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone living in the 21st century.
Recommended to Czarny by: Robert Barber
The Wealth of Nations is an excellent work of the 18th Century enlightenment. It examines in a logical way that can be understood by any reader how government actions in commerce canharm the public interest.

For example if price controls are instituted because food costs too much in a city, supply will diminish radically as producers will take their crops to a different city. If a trading company (e.g. British India company) is given a monopoly over the trade from East Asia, then the price of tea
May 23, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
A long time to read, but providing interesting perspective. Adam Smith is called the Father of Modern Economics. After reading his book, considered his magnum opus (great work), I have the following thought to share.

Smith discusses three types of people; those who make money by rent, by labor, and by employment of stock. With respect to the various laws each of these group tends to propose, he considers the likely merits. Those who make money by rent can only make money if the people who supply
I have had a bookmark mid way through this book for many a year now Reading it has been a surprise. Growing up through the 1980s I expected The Wealth of Nations to be the enthusiastic promotion of the Devil-take-the hindmost attitudes of those years and I expected it to be the herald of the coming industrial revolution. I have been wrong on both counts.

There is a deep sympathy for those at the bottom of society. Equally the society whose economic functions he was describing is a pre-modern one,
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Most famous observation in all of economics 1 12 Aug 19, 2018 08:38AM  
AoM Essential Man...: The Wealth of Nations 1 9 May 01, 2015 09:14AM  
Goodreads Librari...: Typo 2 17 Oct 24, 2014 09:40PM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
  • Capitalism and Freedom
  • The Road to Serfdom
  • Das Kapital
  • The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation
  • Leviathan
  • The Marx-Engels Reader
  • An Essay on the Principle of Population
  • The Prince
  • On Liberty
  • The Social Contract
  • The Social Contract and Discourses
  • Democracy in America
  • Reflections on the Revolution in France
  • The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
  • Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
  • Capital, Vol. 1: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production
  • Second Treatise of Government
See similar books…
Although the exact date of Smith's birth is unknown, his baptism was recorded on 16 June 1723 at Kirkcaldy.

A Scottish moral philosopher and a pioneer of political economy. One of the key figures of the Scottish Enlightenment, Smith is the author of The Theory of Moral Sentiments and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. The latter, usually abbreviated as The Wealth of

Related Articles

If you haven't heard of record-smashing singer and songwriter Mariah Carey, is there any hope for you? Who else has sold more than 200 million...
59 likes · 24 comments
“Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.” 231 likes
“The man whose whole life is spent in performing a few simple operations, of which the effects are perhaps always the same, or very nearly the same, has no occasion to exert his understanding or to exercise his invention in finding out expedients for removing difficulties which never occur. He naturally loses, therefore, the habit of such exertion, and generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become. ” 118 likes
More quotes…