Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health” as Want to Read:
Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health

4.15  ·  Rating details ·  1,100 ratings  ·  163 reviews
A complex web of factors has created the phenomenon of overdiagnosis: the popular media promotes fear of disease and perpetuates the myth that early, aggressive treatment is always best; in an attempt to avoid lawsuits, doctors have begun to leave no test undone, no abnormality overlooked; and profits are being made from screenings, medical procedures, and pharmaceuticals. ...more
Hardcover, 228 pages
Published January 18th 2011 by Beacon Press (first published January 1st 2011)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Overdiagnosed, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Overdiagnosed

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.15  · 
Rating details
 ·  1,100 ratings  ·  163 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Jafar
Feb 28, 2012 rated it really liked it
First-World problems.

If you’ve been led to believe that it’s a good idea to get an annual physical checkup even though there’s nothing wrong with you, you need to read this book. The idea that it’s beneficial that we subject ourselves to tests and screenings, which are judged based on sometimes arbitrarily-set numerical criteria, only to look for problems that do not yet exist or have not shown up yet as symptoms is a pseudo-scientific hoax that is promulgated by those who want to sell you tests
...more
Meredith
Mar 04, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: nonfiction
Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health challenges the current mindset that it's always desirable and beneficial to obsessively screen healthy people for potential illnesses. Dr. Welch describes how actively pursuing illness in healthy people can actually be harmful to the patient.

Why is it bad to discover that people have diseases they don't know about and that have yet to create any symptoms? A few reasons are:

1) The medical-industrial complex continually lowers the numbers
...more
Jeanette
Jun 09, 2018 rated it really liked it
Tons of repetition for very good reasons. And some of them are excellently charted too.

This book gets specific. About certain human health conditions and the outcomes for "early find", "late find", no treatments etc.

It has specific issues to address re high blood pressure, cholesterol meds, yearly screenings for just about anything, check-ups etc. And how those patients react. Good, bad, or status quo.

And the relationship to longevity in this stats is truly amazing, IMHO.

The meds outcomes ar
...more
A.
Apr 24, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to A. by: no one
This book is a lot better and more accurate than you would think. I happened upon it at the library. After looking at it for a week I was super bored and read it. Could not put it down! It explains how diagnostic tests have shifted (high cholesterol is now 200 and over where before it was 240 and over) after studies (paid for by drug companies-often) determined a lower threshold was needed. It also discusses how if you get enough tests you are bound to find something and that sometimes the treat ...more
Sally
May 07, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: health, medicine
A very clear, well-reasoned, reader friendly, evidence-based argument for the view that preemptively hunting for health problems in asymptomatic people through routine screenings and tests, and lowering diagnostic thresholds (as has been done with high blood pressure, cholesterol, and diabetes), is not in the best interests of the vast majority of people. Many such early-intervention strategies do not lower the number of deaths from those diseases, result in false positives and overtreatment, an ...more
David Quinn
Jul 24, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
More than 35 years ago my father died, too young, from pancreatic cancer. I learned at a young age that there were benign tumors and malignant tumors but I've always held the belief that if I have cancer in my body I want it removed. And sooner rather than later. And I would want to know as soon as possible.

Over the years I've heard that there were controversies about screening for and treating prostate and breast cancer. (These are discussed in the book and presented very well.) Who wouldn't w
...more
Michael Perkins
Feb 25, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Lest there be any doubt, it was doctors who created the opioid epidemic. Big Pharma was there, ready to pounce, but it was foolish, god-like thinking that set it up....

https://www.vox.com/2017/6/5/15111936...


==========

for those who don't have the time, or the inclination, to read the entire book, here's an excellent article by the author that captures his thesis. The metrics have just been arbitrarily lowered again on blood pressure (hypertension) to sell more pills.

http://dartmed.dartmouth.edu
...more
Anastasia
Aug 07, 2018 rated it really liked it
A book that all healthcare providers and consumers should read.
Joan
Sep 10, 2013 rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: Every adult
Recommended to Joan by: ??
I found myself feeling dubious about some of the claims. I also found myself wishing for more detail. Basically, the concept is that doing hunting expeditions for diseases isn't a good idea. He is all for what he calls diagnostic screening: if the patient goes to the doctor with a lump or something. He is very opposed to screening being done routinely and explains why in convincing detail. I'm just not completely convinced. My father in law was diagnosed with colon cancer after getting a toilet ...more
Jodi
Apr 03, 2011 rated it it was amazing
If you are interested in America's health care system, you should read this book. The authors are practicing physicians and bring both real world experience and an MD level understanding of clinical trials. We are moving from treating sick people that have definite symptoms to looking at healthy people with no symptoms in the hope that "early detection" will prevent sickness. With the advent of MRIs and CT scans, we are able to see much more than ever before. The cut offs for diagnosing high blo ...more
Mark
Aug 24, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: medicine
I've always liked technical papers that have a graphic in them that summarizes the whole paper. Dr. Welch and his coauthors' sobering look at over-diagnosis can be summarized with one graph that they present in the opening chapters:

graphic1

We've been screening for more and more in asymptomatic patients in the last 50 years, based on the premise that it would be better to catch things early and treat them. So, have patient outcomes improved? After several million people have been affected by this onslaug
...more
Sam
Jul 22, 2011 rated it really liked it
Dr. Welch was involved in an experiment in which a group of men who had had heart attacks were split into two groups, one of which was equipped with devices to measure irregularities & the other which was given the usual regular checkups. The experiment was discontinued when the researchers found that the device-equipped group received more treatment & died in greater numbers. This got the author looking for similar medical treatment phenomena.

If a form of cancer has become much more co
...more
Carl
Apr 14, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
Everyone should read this book, but I fear that few will. Partly because it is perceived as a difficult topic. No worries there: Dr. Welch and his co-authors make this as easy and straightforward a read as possible. Even if you barely passed high school biology or math, you'll have no problems here: the science is simple, the statistics are very clearly explained.

Another reason folks might not read this is that they are comfortable delegating their personal health decisions to physicians. The fa
...more
Asha Tenbroeke
Mar 03, 2011 rated it really liked it
'Overdiagnosed' is, without a doubt, an important book. It convincingly shows that if we look harder for a disease, we find more "abnormalities" but we're not preventing any deaths. Instead, the more people are subjected to unneccesary medical procedures, which can be just scary, expersive and annoying but also debilitating or even lethal.
The authors explains how this happens with great clarity. Let's say, as an example, that each year a hundred women find a lump in their breast. They go and se
...more
Jennifer
Jan 20, 2012 rated it liked it
The biggest fault of this book is probably the tendency of the author to repeat himself rather a lot, both in explaining what he means and what he does not mean to say. But you can understand that because of the severe risks to his readers of misinterpretation of his message, or to himself if others looking to sue him were to misconstrue what he is saying.
Welch has an important point to make - I won't bore you with a restating of what that point is, as you will have read about it already to get
...more
Amie
Aug 01, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book was really interesting considering the direction American healthcare is taking, namely spending more and more money but doing nothing to actually improve quality of life. I mainly picked it up because there was a chapter about ultrasound and fetal monitoring...turned out this was the shortest chapter but worth reading. The author had a degree in economics before going to med school so his perspective was unique. My main complaint is how frequently the author repeated catch phrases...we ...more
yaman
Mar 05, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Underwhelming. The entire book demonstrated how over-diagnosis is harmful when seeking out diseases that are asymptomatic. Welch, also dismisses the financial incentives within the market to seek diagnosis and to treat early. Lastly, he was completely silent as to how health reform provisions (if the Supreme Court doesn't shut it down) will actually curb over-diagnosis and realign incentives towards health promotion and prevention.
Hanan Kayali
Sep 26, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: english
The book is good but very repetitive.
Katherine Early
Aug 03, 2018 rated it liked it
Shelves: health
3.5 Some parts really interesting but some less so.
Lise Kristin Knutsen
Not sure which date I started it.
Pete
Jun 02, 2016 rated it really liked it
Overdiagnosed : Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health (2012) by H Gilbert Welch describes how diagnosing people without symptoms is a serious problem with modern health systems.

Over diagnosis is definitely a problem. Prostate screening and over diagnosis is accepted by many, perhaps most medical researchers as a serious problem. Screening in other areas is also seen as something that can cause real harm. Making abnormal physical characteristics diseases is definitely unwise. The incentives
...more
Azure
Feb 28, 2014 rated it it was amazing
After hearing Dr. Welch give this presentation I immediately went out and got the book. He does a convincing way of presenting data to support his premise without putting one to sleep. I feel his conclusions are well reasoned and logical and appreciate his suggestions regarding 'what now'. You can see his presentation on You Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-Dnz.... If this message resonates with you then I'd suggest you read The End of Illness and Our Daily Meds. Both books lend themselves ...more
Karen
Jun 28, 2011 rated it liked it
The book definitely doesn't read like a novel, but the flow isn't too bad. The authors make their thesis clearly and support it with much research. Some of the numbers might be slightly suspect, but that doesn't undermine the argument. The authors do emphasize that they don't oppose freedom of choice regarding screenings and early diagnoses for conditions that may come to naught, which gets a little repetitive but is probably necessary. They always try to make a statistical argument, although th ...more
Laloofah
Jun 19, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I'd seen a few of Dr. Welch's interviews online (and enjoyed them) before reading this, and as a patient of Dr. John McDougall I was already well versed in the insidious risks of overdiagnosis - and have been an unwitting victim of it myself several times. Dr. Welch's book is an important read - because truly informed consent is so often lacking, while aggressive marketing of highly questionable "early detection" testing and other procedures is pervasive. I liked Dr. Welch's eloquent summary on ...more
Lisa Shultz
May 25, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: health
I have experienced overdiagnosis. It caused me emotional and mental stress (high) and financial stress (moderate) for an unnecessary surgery. The zeal for early diagnosis and treatment did not serve me well and I will think hard before going down that path again. This book was excellent to open my eyes to a different paradigm and gain more balance in how to approach my health. I really recommend it. I enjoyed the Audible version.
John Shedd
Aug 04, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Really good book to help negotiate one of the many areas of difficult decisions regarding healthcare. Doesn't just give you data, but promotes different perspectives on how to analyze and interpret the data, and the difference between good and flawed data.
Jen
Jun 18, 2011 rated it liked it
This book presents some interesting ideas, and it certainly made me feel like a Monday-morning quarterback about some of my recent health decisions. Some of the writing feels a bit redundant, but dividing the chapters by conditions helps to keep things moving. A solid 3 1/2 stars.
Jim Duncan
Dec 08, 2012 rated it it was amazing
The want to know versus the need to know. Nicely balances the concerns about over testing with the benefits of early detection. Always a two edged sword
Janeo
Dec 20, 2013 rated it liked it
Interesting views on routine testing, and worth pondering and revising. But if taken too literally, seems like dangerous advice.
Suzanne
Sep 27, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Everyone
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine Is Making Us Sicker and Poorer
  • How We Do Harm: A Doctor Breaks Ranks About Being Sick in America
  • Overdosed America: The Broken Promise of American Medicine
  • Sick: The Untold Story of America's Health Care Crisis---and the People Who Pay the Price
  • Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won't Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Health Care
  • The Truth about the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do about It
  • Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies are Turning Us All into Patients
  • Medicine in Translation: Journeys with My Patients
  • The Best Care Possible: A Physician's Quest to Transform Care Through the End of Life
  • Fractured Minds: A Case-Study Approach to Clinical Neuropsychology
  • The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care
  • Anatomy of an Illness: As Perceived by the Patient
  • Unseduced and Unshaken: The Place of Dignity in a Woman's Choices
  • The Lonely Patient: How We Experience Illness
  • Medical Mysteries: From the Bizarre to the Deadly . . . The Cases That Have Baffled Doctors
  • White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine
  • Spiritual Warfare: Christians, Demonization and Deliverance
  • Hippocrates' Shadow: What Doctors Don't Know, Don't Tell You, and How Truth Can Repair the Patient-Doctor Breach
See similar books…
“I am often asked about three assumed benefits of mammography: less metastatic disease, less need for aggressive treatments, and important reassurance. Unfortunately, reviewing the actual evidence suggests that these “benefits” are limited or nonexistent.” 1 likes
“To the extent that I have control over my cause of death, avoiding a heart-disease death, an aneurysm death, or a cancer death isn’t my top priority. I’m more concerned about suffering a lingering cognitive decline in a long-term-care facility. And” 0 likes
More quotes…