Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Constants of Nature: The Numbers That Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe” as Want to Read:
The Constants of Nature: The Numbers That Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Constants of Nature: The Numbers That Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe

3.73  ·  Rating details ·  339 Ratings  ·  27 Reviews
Reality as we know it is bound by a set of constants—numbers and values that dictate the strengths of forces like gravity, the speed of light, and the masses of elementary particles. In The Constants of Nature, Cambridge Professor and bestselling author John D.Barrow takes us on an exploration of these governing principles. Drawing on physicists such as Einstein and Planck ...more
ebook, 368 pages
Published May 6th 2009 by Vintage (first published November 26th 2002)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Constants of Nature, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Constants of Nature

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Michael A. Sherbon
Breezy read, with some humorous quotes. Good overall review and a little heavy on the possibility of changing constants. “Since only a narrow range of the allowed values for, say, the fine structure constant will permit observers to exist in the Universe, we must find ourselves in the narrow range of possibilities which permit them, no matter how improbable they are. We must ask for the conditional probability of observing constants to take particular ranges, given that other features of the Uni ...more
Roger
May 15, 2014 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Don't be misled by title - this is a book about cosmology, the structure of the universe, and how life, of the sort we know, fits in. I struggled with the first few chapters because I didn't feel that the author really explained why so few fundamental physical constants (primarily, the speed of light, the gravitational constant and Planck's constant) are needed to describe the universe. I was expecting there to be a lot more, such as the masses of the particles comprising the standard model, the ...more
Michael A. Sherbon
Oct 03, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: reference
Breezy read, with some humorous quotes. Good overall review and a little heavy on the possibility of changing constants. “Since only a narrow range of the allowed values for, say, the fine structure constant will permit observers to exist in the Universe, we must find ourselves in the narrow range of possibilities which permit them, no matter how improbable they are. We must ask for the conditional probability of observing constants to take particular ranges, given that other features of the Uni ...more
Jim Fonseca
Oct 06, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Let's start with what this book is not about. It's not about mathematical constants such as pi and little e, the natural logarithm. It is about constants of physics such as Planck's constant, the speed of light and the gravitational constant. The book is primarily about cosmology focused around the question, is the universe expanding or contracting? What happens to these physical constants in these cases; are they the same everywhere in the universe at all times and in all places, or can they va ...more
Tuomas
Jul 18, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: popular-science
Constants are a topic that interests me greatly, since I've written about them in my own philosophical work. Barrow is the first-hand authority on the topic, given his involvement in the team that found possible variation of the fine-structure constant via observation of quasars. So I was excited to finally read this book, even though it's over a decade old now. And it is a good book: very catchy writing and nice anecdotes. However, for someone who already knew much of the relevant data, this wa ...more
Rama
Feb 20, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Changing Constants

n order to explain physical reality, physicists measure and determine physical quantities/parameters/information related to the object/subject in question using well defined laws such as; the laws of classical physics (theory relativity), quantum mechanics, and thermodynamics. Physicists do not know the details of all the laws, and their interpretations/explanations often vary, but the physical laws themselves are the same across the universe. Einstein's principle of covariance
...more
Ilya
Oct 24, 2013 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Despite the title, the book is mostly about just one constant. Take two electrons very far apart; bringing them to distance d of each other takes work that is proportional to 1/d. Now take a photon with frequency 1/d; its energy is also proportional to 1/d. Dividing the two coefficients of proportionality produces the fine structure constant, 1/137.035999074(44). This is the strength of the electromagnetic interaction, a fundamental force of nature. There is a caveat: quantum field theory says t ...more
Hollowman
May 21, 2014 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This review will be in draft mode for a while.
I actually got this book way back in 2002 when it was first pub'd.
What a confusing mess!

I haven't read any of Barrows' other books, so I can't say whether he can't (IMO) write clear books in general or whether the lack of clarity is an issue with Constants...
In the first chapter -- heck, even in the Preface -- the author should LIST off (bullet, number, letter, etc.) the Constants (symbol and all) followed by a one- or two-sentence description.
Next
...more
Thomas Paul
There is a good book in this book somewhere, but it is trapped inside of a fair book that promises a lot more than it actually delivers. There is an initial problem that the book fails to make the case as to why particular constants are important. When discussing the fine structure constant (which is really the only constant that is given any significant coverage), the author tells us that it is made up of a combination of the electron charge, the speed of light, and Plank's constant. One might ...more
Finn
Sep 11, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: factual
I quite liked this book although I felt it drifted off in places to irrelevant or fluffy things. That said, it did cover a range of interesting topics in Physics and was broken up with some funny and quirky quotes by famous authors, scientists, etc. which was a nice touch. The book probably could have been condensed to half the size, but I can understand why it wasn't - you'd probably lose the friendly tone and extra snippets of insight and humour that the author put in, which although didn't ad ...more
Tammy
Apr 18, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
For a lay person, this book about the mathematical formulas that undergird our world is strangely accessible. I was constantly fascinated by what physicists already know... the formulas for gravity, speed of light, etc. are both eminently simple and strikingly complex. Their interplay shows how narrow of a window the universe allows for life as we know it to exist.

For anyone who loves physics, but isn’t a physicist, this book will provide a gripping read.
Robert Hernandez
The title and initial pre-reading of the book promised a lot, but failed to meet my expectations. Mr. Barrow might be a good scientist, but he is not as good a philosopher and touches on subjects of religion and belief in a mocking tone that made evident a lack of knowledge on the subject.

Fairly good exposition on the current state of physics, but disappointing in philosophical matters.
David Stag
Jun 03, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Not what I expected. More a philosophy treatise than an exploration of the physical meaning of constants. A lot of wild speculation. I can see why some may like it, but the title could be more accurate in describing what the book is about.
Deb
Sep 18, 2010 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Finally finished this book. The concepts are way beyond my brain power, but it is wonderfully written and organized. I wish I actually grasped the information better, but that is my problem, not the writer's.
Britain
Mar 08, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science-math
It was a fascinating read for a non-scientist. I found the knowledge and explanations to be conveyed as easily as they can be (some of the formulas and constants' math required re-reading at times).

I found most of the last third or quarter to be preachy and superfluous. It did not add much.
Hadrian
Nice and easy overview of some of the most underlying concepts of physical science. A bit slow in the beginning, but really picks up in the later chapters.
David
Jun 13, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Very informative, but, slightly unsure of itself in terms of who its geared towards
Sean
Aug 05, 2010 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Interesting angle on the anthropic universe and understanding what possible multiverses might look like in the Darwinian universe theory.
Cosuma
Apr 09, 2009 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
What happens first is not necessarily the beginning.
Brian King
Jul 12, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Even the scientists don't know!
Marty
Aug 07, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
If there weren't so many books I want to read, i would start over and see if I would understand more.
Andrea Aprile
Aug 06, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
L'epicità fatta a libro. Semplicissimo, scorrevolissimo, FIGHISSIMO e a tratti molto emozionante. Uno dei libri che mi hanno cambiato la vita.
Austin Calico
Much is good, but the last few chapters are overly wordy and not written as clearly.
Johann Fourie
Jun 12, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Give a overview of how we see nature and the cosmos.
Kenneth
rated it liked it
Feb 18, 2017
Memo Olicón
rated it really liked it
Feb 22, 2015
Santi Acosta
rated it really liked it
Sep 09, 2013
Eric
rated it liked it
Aug 16, 2012
Alexander Lazarov
rated it it was ok
Dec 18, 2012
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Quintessence: The Mystery of Missing Mass in the Universe
  • How to Dunk a Doughnut: The Science Of Everyday Life
  • Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Universe Is Just Right for Life
  • Does God Play Dice?: The New Mathematics of Chaos
  • What Is Mathematics, Really?
  • The Fourth Dimension: A Guided Tour of the Higher Universes
  • A History of Mathematics
  • The Infinity Puzzle: Quantum Field Theory and the Hunt for an Orderly Universe
  • Once Upon A Number: The Hidden Mathematical Logic Of Stories
  • Mathematics - The New Golden Age
  • The Arrow of Time
  • Our Cosmic Habitat
  • Dark Cosmos: In Search of Our Universe's Missing Mass and Energy
  • Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law
  • A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down
  • The Life of the Cosmos
  • Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos
  • Black Holes, Wormholes and Time Machines

Goodreads is hiring!

If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.
Learn more »
72043
John D. Barrow is a professor of mathematical sciences and director of the Millennium Mathematics Project at Cambridge University and a Fellow of the Royal Society.

He was awarded the 2006 Templeton Prize for "Progress Toward Research or Discoveries about Spiritual Realities" for his "writings about the relationship between life and the universe, and the nature of human understanding [which] have c
...more
More about John D. Barrow...

Share This Book

“Prior to then it was believed that black holes were just cosmic cookie monsters, swallowing everything that came within their gravitational clutches.” 3 likes
“Since only a narrow range of the allowed values for, say, the fine structure constant will permit observers to exist in the Universe, we must find ourselves in the narrow range of possibilities which permit them, no matter how improbable they are. We must ask for the conditional probability of observing constants to take particular ranges, given that other features of the Universe, like its age, satisfy necessary conditions for life.” 0 likes
More quotes…