Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy” as Want to Read:
The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy

3.94  ·  Rating details ·  80 ratings  ·  5 reviews
The growth of technological and scientific knowledge in the past two centuries has been the overriding dynamic element in the economic and social history of the world. Its result is now often called the knowledge economy. But what are the historical origins of this revolution and what have been its mechanisms? In The Gifts of Athena, Joel Mokyr constructs an original ...more
Paperback, 384 pages
Published November 7th 2004 by Princeton University Press (first published November 4th 2002)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Gifts of Athena, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Gifts of Athena

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.94  · 
Rating details
 ·  80 ratings  ·  5 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy
Josh
Mar 02, 2012 rated it really liked it
Joel Mokyr is my favorite economist, historian, and intellectual merely for his devotion to details and creating a tenacious argument. This is the second book of his I read, after The Lever of Riches, which is better only for its expansive scope of identifying how various societies develop economically and others don't. I'm sorry Jared Diamond, but Mokyr nails it, drives it home, and puts it to bed: societies only prosper for their desire to create better technologies; Geography has little to do ...more
Dio Mavroyannis
Oct 22, 2018 rated it liked it
Really enjoyed the model employed to explain phenomena. Unfortunately I don't think the evidence for it was compelling. Nevertheless I found that this book used very interesting sources of data. It's a good book I just don't think it achieves what it sets out to, which is to show that epistemic and technical knowledge are important variables in explaining paradigms. I think focusing purely on technical knowledge is sufficient.
Gary Thompson
Jan 22, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Professor Mokyr was one of my economics professors at Northwestern University. From a footnote in one of Richard Florida's books on Creative Capital, I was directed to this book, 20 years after graduating with my economics degree. As I joked with my Professor over lunch in Evanston, after reading his book, he is even more interesting now, than he was in my Sophomore year... :-)
Tori.T
Apr 10, 2012 added it
Way pass expiry date, gotta return it to the library. Will finish it another time !
Ville Pohjanheimo
rated it really liked it
Oct 17, 2011
Billy
rated it it was amazing
Oct 06, 2012
Dorotea
rated it really liked it
Nov 27, 2017
Ankit Sahu
rated it it was amazing
Jan 18, 2017
Charlie
rated it it was amazing
Feb 07, 2007
Francisco Lepe
rated it really liked it
Jul 19, 2014
Ben
rated it really liked it
Apr 24, 2019
Kelvin
rated it really liked it
Jan 18, 2019
Heather
rated it liked it
Nov 30, 2011
Muzakkir
rated it really liked it
Apr 20, 2014
Koen Robeys
rated it liked it
May 23, 2015
David
rated it really liked it
Nov 19, 2011
Thomas Stemwedel
rated it liked it
Dec 08, 2013
Francisco
rated it really liked it
Mar 31, 2013
Steffen Habermalz
rated it really liked it
Oct 24, 2013
Greg
rated it it was amazing
Dec 16, 2015
David Burel
rated it really liked it
Feb 11, 2015
Robert Priddle
rated it liked it
Jun 11, 2012
Matsini1
rated it really liked it
Jul 05, 2013
Richard Zhu
rated it really liked it
Sep 06, 2019
Martin Watzinger
rated it it was amazing
Mar 21, 2015
Emrys
rated it really liked it
Nov 16, 2019
Brian
rated it it was amazing
Jun 17, 2014
Kiril
rated it it was ok
Apr 05, 2017
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope
  • On the Shortness of Life
  • Trillion Dollar Coach: The Leadership Playbook of Silicon Valley's Bill Campbell
  • Landmark Experiments in Twentieth-Century Physics
  • Netflixed: The Epic Battle for America's Eyeballs
  • Lifespan: Why We Age—and Why We Don't Have To
  • The Defining Decade: Why Your Twenties Matter--And How to Make the Most of Them Now
  • 7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy
  • 嫌われる勇気
  • Invisible Cities
  • Scientific Culture and the Making of the Industrial West
  • The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire
  • Friday Black
  • Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution
  • Economical Writing
  • The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom
  • The Elements of Justice
See similar books…
47 followers
Joel Mokyr is a Netherlands-born American-Israeli economic historian. He is the Robert H. Strotz Professor of Arts and Sciences and professor of economics and history at Northwestern University, and Sackler Professor at the Eitan Berglas School of Economics at the University of Tel Aviv.
“All this is not to suggest that the growth in useful knowledge is leading us to a world of bliss. Athena's gifts were many: she gave King Cecrops the olive tree, but she also gave the city of Troy the wooden horse that led to its destruction. Technology makes people more powerful in exploiting nature, but how and for what purpose they do so remains indeterminate. If the twentieth century has shown us anything, it is that the capacity of humans for intolerance, stupidity, and selfishness has not declined as their technological power has increased.” 1 likes
“A century ago, historians of technology felt that individual inventors were the main actors that brought about the Industrial Revolution. Such heroic interpretations were discarded in favor of views that emphasized deeper economic and social factors such as institutions, incentives, demand, and factor prices. It seems, however, that the crucial elements were neither brilliant individuals nor the impersonal forces governing the masses, but a small group of at most a few thousand people who formed a creative community based on the exchange of knowledge. Engineers, mechanics, chemists, physicians, and natural philosophers formed circles in which access to knowledge was the primary objective. Paired with the appreciation that such knowledge could be the base of ever-expanding prosperity, these elite networks were indispensable, even if individual members were not. Theories that link education and human capital to technological progress need to stress the importance of these small creative communities jointly with wider phenomena such as literacy rates and universal schooling.” 1 likes
More quotes…