I'm a pretty concrete thinker and tend to take things literally. While this is a good reference for confirming syntax, etc., the language used in some of the explanations has an abstractness to it that I found difficult. Where the information itself could have been formated to demonstrate or reiterate the explanation, it often isn't.
'''This is a multiline block'''
... is written on a single line. I reread it more than once because I thought maybe I was misinterpreting. I would've immediately been confident that I understood if it had instead been:
'''
This is a
multiline
block
'''
Table 1 has descending order for ascending precedence of operators, and it would've been lovely if it had been arranged to be ascending-ascending or descending-descending instead, reducing the need for the confusing explanation about "lower cells of this table have higher precedence".