Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World's Beliefs” as Want to Read:
Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World's Beliefs
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World's Beliefs

3.54  ·  Rating details ·  39 ratings  ·  3 reviews
A world-renowned religion scholar explores the world's major religions and comparable secular systems of thought in this unusually wide-ranging and accessible work. Ninian Smart considers Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, as well as Marxist-Leninism, Maoism, nationalism, and Native American, African, and other systems of belief. His goal is to ad ...more
Paperback, 359 pages
Published June 29th 1999 by University of California Press (first published 1996)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Dimensions of the Sacred, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Dimensions of the Sacred

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
3.54  · 
Rating details
 ·  39 ratings  ·  3 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Greg
Apr 24, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Ninian Smart is one of the fathers of the secular study of religion. His approach is phenomenological. This book presents his taxonomy of religion. It was based on his original work that was presented in The Religious Experience of Mankind. He added a dimension (now 7 instead of 6). Unfortunately the student doesn't agree with the teacher. Smart tried to shoehorn modern ideological movements (i.e. Marxism) into the same religious categories. I disagree with him on that point. Other than that, it ...more
Desytiovanda
Feb 04, 2018 rated it it was ok
j
Arnaldo Goncalves
Mar 12, 2015 rated it really liked it
This is a very nice book by Ninian Smart. It is clever, fluent and very broad in the perception it passes of the overall problems in the scientific field of religion and within the so-called 'religious dialogue'. I have been using it as complementary literature to my academic studies in the Master of Study of Religions. Ninian departs, in his essay, from the area of non-theist religions and makes a difference in the correlated literature that prefers to start by the monotheist religions and, the ...more
Kim Hankins
rated it liked it
Feb 04, 2015
Anna
rated it it was ok
Mar 22, 2008
Becky
rated it liked it
Mar 10, 2012
Yentl
rated it really liked it
Aug 27, 2013
Mentatreader
rated it liked it
Jan 10, 2015
Alina
rated it liked it
Oct 25, 2009
Robert Gatewood
rated it really liked it
Dec 13, 2013
Daniellegaha
rated it really liked it
Apr 10, 2013
Matt Coward
rated it really liked it
Aug 25, 2016
Kevin
rated it it was ok
Nov 11, 2014
Gary
rated it it was ok
Jun 20, 2012
Diether
rated it liked it
Oct 26, 2016
Lupe Ojeda
rated it it was amazing
Oct 05, 2015
Sskilletlover
rated it it was ok
Nov 03, 2016
Bram Van boxtel
rated it it was ok
Oct 31, 2016
Rey Thalia
rated it really liked it
Aug 28, 2016
Robert Mealing
rated it really liked it
Jul 05, 2018
Heather
rated it liked it
Jun 05, 2012
Dudu
rated it liked it
Feb 24, 2014
Sipke
rated it really liked it
Sep 16, 2016
Ajani Tatum
rated it liked it
Nov 11, 2013
Mitchell26 McLaughlin
rated it really liked it
Mar 01, 2010
Hanna
rated it liked it
Dec 02, 2016
Liam Blake
rated it it was amazing
Oct 02, 2012
Krijn Pansters
rated it it was amazing
Aug 02, 2013
Amanda
rated it it was amazing
Dec 06, 2016
Anne Hokenstad
rated it liked it
Sep 29, 2016
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »