Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Who Made God?: Searching for a Theory of Everything” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Who Made God?: Searching for a Theory of Everything

(Welwyn Commentary #48)

Edgar Andrews (Goodreads Author)

4.11 · Rating details · 243 ratings · 44 reviews

If you've been waiting for a really effective riposte to the "new atheism" of Richard Dawkins and others (or even if you haven't) here it is - gently humorous, highly readable, deeply serious, razor sharp, and written by an internationally respected scientist. Who made God? dismantles the arguments and pretensions of scientific atheism and presents a robust biblical theism ...more

Get A Copy

Or buy for $7.99

Hardcover, 303 pages

Published September 1st 2009 by EP BOOKS (first published June 1st 1996)

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Who Made God?, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Who Made God?

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 4.11 ·

Rating details

· 243 ratings · 44 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Who Made God?: Searching for a Theory of Everything

Dec 31, 2020 Natalie Vellacott rated it it was ok

Shelves: christian-hot-topics

After recommending this to a friend, I found that this was far too complex for my tiny mind. It might be useful as a reference book and to counter Dawkins but I wouldn't attempt to read it through as it's definitely not light reading! ...more

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Feb 22, 2010 John Gardner rated it it was amazing

I don’t know if I’ve ever had more fun reading a book so steeped in scientific terminology… in fact, I’m sure I haven’t! Andrews, who serves as Emeritus Professor of Materials at the University of London, is one of the world’s foremost experts on molecular science. He also possesses a keen wit and employs a great sense of charming British humor in his writing (think Monty Python without the crassness).

In this book, Andrews addresses what he calls “the sceptic’s favourite question”: If God made e

In this book, Andrews addresses what he calls “the sceptic’s favourite question”: If God made everything, then who made God? Richard Dawkins and many other “new atheists” seem to think this is a trump card that destroys any argument in favor of a Creator God. Rather than simply refuting the arguments of these atheists, though, Andrews instead asserts that this is an “unanswerable question” not because Christians do not have an answer, but because the question leaves the word “God” undefined. The question “Who made God?” begs the question “Who is God?”

With that in mind, Andrews seeks to come up with a scientific “theory of everything”, which he says is every scientist’s dream. Whereas many Christian apologists have devoted themselves to refuting the assertions of atheists (primarily in regards to Darwinian evolution), the author’s goal is to promote a positive thesis (that God exists and reveals Himself in the Bible) rather than a negative antithesis (that Darwinian evolution is false). His book’s purpose then, is “to explore how the biblical hypothesis of God provides a comprehensible, intellectually consistent and spiritually satisfying view of being that encompasses man’s experience of life, the universe and everything.”

Andrews explores the origin of life using what in science is called the “hypothetical approach”. This involves investigating two (or more) mutually exclusive hypotheses, and observing which hypothesis accounts most plausibly for what we observe in every area of life. He reasons that this is the approach seen in the Bible itself. Nowhere in God’s Word do we find any argument that seeks to prove God’s existence. It is assumed from the very beginning: “In the beginning God…”

The book goes through all of the most recent scientific theories regarding the origin of life, as well as the history of how those theories developed. He covers everything from molecular biology to astrophysics to natural selection to string theory. This branches out into discussions of philosophy and psychology. At every point, though, these complex scientific theories are presented in layman’s terms, making heavy use of analogy. At each point of discussion, Andrews explains how “natural science” (which assumes there is no God) accounts for what is observed, and then compares it with his hypothesis of God (which assumes that He exists and that the Bible offers explanation for all that is observed). It is truly fascinating.

If you are a fan of books dealing with the “Creation vs. Evolution” debate, this is a must-read. If you are skeptical of God’s existence or the authority of his Word, this will address your questions better than just about anything else out there. If you’ve never read a book in this genre, this is a great place to start! In other words, buy this book… eventually. It’s been a hot seller, and is currently unavailable pending a second printing! When it is available, you’ll find it here. In the meantime, feel free to borrow my copy!

Also, you can find a video of the author introducing this book here. It’s worth watching just to hear Edgar Andrews’ voice!

...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Dec 12, 2019 Clinton Wilcox rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: apologetics-science

Edgar Andrews is a physicist who has written this book to defend the God hypothesis (i.e. God is real and is the best explanation for man’s experiences and the universe). Contra to what modern scientists believe, if you want an explanation for why the universe exists, the God hypothesis is necessary. Science, itself, cannot explain the most fundamental questions of existence.

One thing to be said about Andrews is that he writes in a way that non-experts in physics can understand. He usually has a Edgar Andrews is a physicist who has written this book to defend the God hypothesis (i.e. God is real and is the best explanation for man’s experiences and the universe). Contra to what modern scientists believe, if you want an explanation for why the universe exists, the God hypothesis is necessary. Science, itself, cannot explain the most fundamental questions of existence.

One thing to be said about Andrews is that he writes in a way that non-experts in physics can understand. He usually has a simple explanation to help facilitate understanding regarding some complex theory or idea in physics (even though his analogies aren’t always very good). He is clearly knowledgeable and you will definitely learn much about science by reading this book.

I am not very knowledgeable in science so I’m not really qualified to address his scientific discussions. I will say that he rejects the concept of theistic evolution and many of his arguments sound fairly similar to those used by modern Intelligent Design theorists. However, I did find his 14th and 15th chapters, where he discusses evolution and mutations, to be pretty interesting.

He has short blurbs before each chapter, where he summarizes what he is going to talk about in the chapter and then gives some definitions of terms that will appear in the chapter. I thought this was very helpful, but then he seems to give up in some chapters, such as chapter three, in which he says all the new terms are explained in the text. But if you’re going to explain new words in the text, there’s no point to defining them in other chapters in the beginning blurb. So he was inconsistent in how helpful his term defining was.

As regards philosophy, however, Andrews leaves much to be desired. Andrews makes quite an ironic statement in chapter 11, p. 167, where he says he finds it surprising that many theists (e.g. St. Augustine) would find common ground with non-Christians (e.g. Benedict Spinoza, a pantheist, and Richard Dawkins, an atheist) in considering miracles as in accord with natural laws. Andrews relies on a faulty definition of miracle, “an event that cannot be explained as the outcome of natural law” (emphasis in original). What is ironic is that Andrews doesn’t understand how much like an atheist he sounds in his rejection of theistic philosophy. But he also doesn’t understand what Augustine means when he said the laws of nature cannot be transgressed because everything that happens according to God’s will occurs by natural processes. It is not hard to see how this could be. If I put a wooden fence in my yard, eventually it will wither and decay because of the weather. But if I remove the fence before this happens, I have stopped this natural occurrence from taking place. But I have not transgressed the natural law of decay by removing the fence. I have simply exerted a different law on the fence. So, for example, when Jesus turned water into wine, this was not a transgression of any natural law. Jesus changed the water at the molecular level to make it become wine. The miracle is not that any such natural law was transgressed. The miracle was that water cannot change into wine, even at the molecular level, instantaneously without miraculous intervention.

Andrews also sets his sights on the Ontological Argument (the Anselmian version), an argument notorious for being misunderstood by those who attempt to rebut it. Rather than going to the source, he contents himself to read the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy to understand the argument (I like the SEP just fine, but if you’re going to address the argument in a book or article, you really ought to have first-hand knowledge of the argument). Andrews’ critique is simply that the OA leads nowhere. The difficulty of the argument arises when we draw the conclusion that the idea of God, which exists in the mind, must correspond to some objective reality outside ourselves. This does seem like a difficulty, unless you consider that Andrews is only considering one premise of the argument and attempting to draw a conclusion about God’s reality from that. I am not going to give a full defense of the argument here. I am certainly no expert on Anselm’s argument. But Andrews is missing several key features of Anselm’s argument, such as: 1) God is, by definition, a being greater than which none can be conceived; 2) There are entities which exist solely in the mind (e.g. unicorns) and entities which exist in reality and in the mind (e.g. President Trump); 3) A being which exists in reality and in the mind is greater than an entity which exists solely in the mind; and 4) If God is a being greater than which none can be conceived, it seems plausible that we can conclude from these facts that God exists in reality as well as in the mind. This argument clearly will not be convincing to everyone. Anselm was attempting to find an a priori argument for God’s existence; that is, an argument apart from experience using reason alone. Andrews did not do his homework while attempting to rebut this argument, so he actually sounds a lot like Richard Dawkins trying to refute it.

Andrews is also constantly uncharitable toward Christian philosophers and apologists who have anything in common with atheists. He essentially calls Christians who use philosophical, scientific, and pragmatic arguments cowards because they are falling into some kind of trap set out by atheists. Instead, Andrews believes we should use the Bible’s concept of God and argue from there. Of course, this is clearly a question-begging approach (no wonder Andrews is so hostile toward philosophy), but he waves that away by saying he’s not really assuming what he wants to prove, but can make certain assumptions that turn out to be true if we assume the God of the Bible. This doesn’t escape the charge of question-begging because for one thing, Andrews doesn’t exactly make his case that the Bible’s concept of God makes correct assumptions about the world while the “evolution” makes false assumptions. Andrews dismisses the arguments of theistic evolutionists (claiming, for example, that Francis Collins doesn’t make a case for it in one of his books, rather than showing how theistic evolution actually fails). He also claims that the God of the Bible predicts a dualistic anthropology of man while evolution predicts a monistic anthropology. Of course, this is false. There are, in fact, Christians who are physicalists, even though they are in the minority. Another reason he doesn’t escape the charge of question-begging is simply because he doesn’t adequately justify his argument that it’s not question-begging. He could argue that he is merely starting with the Bible as a foundation. That would be wrong-headed but at least it would be more defensible. Instead, Andrews says he’s not saying the God hypothesis is proof of anything, merely that it comports with human experience and observation. But what if there’s some third hypothesis Andrews hasn’t considered apart from the God of the Bible which also comports with human observation and experience? Or what if he’s wrong about the implications of the God of the Bible and evolution? Andrews cannot escape the charge of circularity.

Again, Andrews’ book is very readable, and you will learn a lot about some scientific concepts through easy to follow analogies. However, he doesn’t adequately support the main argument of his book and he clearly doesn’t understand philosophy. If you’re going to read his book, take any claims about philosophy with several grains of salt. ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Apr 04, 2015 Peter Bringe rated it really liked it

Shelves: apologetics, theology, philosophy

Professor Andrews argues in this book for the existence of God, yet he does so by starting with the biblical idea of God. Instead of arguing from our experience to a minimalist God (such as many classical arguments tend to do) or arguing for a "God of the gaps" to fill in what we don't understand, Professor Andrews begins with God as the Bible defines Him and then compares this "hypothesis" with what we find in science. His argument is that what we find in the world around us is what we would ex Professor Andrews argues in this book for the existence of God, yet he does so by starting with the biblical idea of God. Instead of arguing from our experience to a minimalist God (such as many classical arguments tend to do) or arguing for a "God of the gaps" to fill in what we don't understand, Professor Andrews begins with God as the Bible defines Him and then compares this "hypothesis" with what we find in science. His argument is that what we find in the world around us is what we would expect to find if what the Bible says is true, and that it is not what we would expect to find if evolution and atheism was true. Thus, while he doesn't use scientific measurements to prove God (God is non-physical), he uses scientific methods to argue for his existence. And because God is the biblical God (e.g. He is the sovereign Creator of all things), His existence does have implications for science.

Professor Andrews' writing is very witty and pleasant to read. He is able to explain complicated scientific theories in a clear and enjoyable way. It is interesting to compare this book with the writings of presuppositionalists like Cornelius Van Til and Greg Bahnsen, since their approach is very similar. On the one hand, Professor Andrews goes beyond a theory of apologetics to the nitty gritty of applying it to modern day science (Van Til and Bahnsen did this some, but they were apologists, not scientists with all the degrees in science that Professor Andrews has). On the other hand, Professor Andrews seems to give science a little bit more neutrality from a biblical worldview than Van Til and Bahnsen. While he argues that the Bible and God's existence has implications for science, he also seems to come to science as neutral observation and theorizing from the facts of our world and then compares it with what the Bible says. Van Til and Bahnsen would argue that even the observation and theorizing must be done with a biblical worldview. Perhaps this is a subtle difference, but I think it shows itself when Professor Andrews argues that the big bang theory (or something like it) is what we would expect if what the Bible says is true (and attempts to harmonize it with literal six day creation). Chapters seven and eight seemed weak in my opinion. Overall, though, he does a good job showing how this world does not match up with evolution or atheistic theory, and that biblical Christianity is a much better explanation for the way the world is.

...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jul 07, 2016 Philip Meinel marked it as shelved

Shelves: faith, apologetics

I read chapter eight Steam Engine to the Stars: Time and the Hypothesis of God.

I love using science to explain the truth of God's word. Some of my thoughts on the concepts found in chapter eight. Outreach to the scientific...

Second law of thermodynamics: Entropy (amount of disorder and chaos, mathematically equal to the net flow of energy divided by time, Q/T) can only increase or stay the same (ex. theoretical perfect engine).

Time can only progress through an increase in entropy.

Can time only ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jun 08, 2010 Alex rated it really liked it

Edgar Andrews is a distinguished scientist who, in this easy to read volume, offers a strong defence of the Christian faith in the light of science. It is a witty, engaging and accessible read aimed squarely at the lay person and he takes complicated and esoteric ideas and makes them understandable.

Andrews doesn't set out to respond to any particular authors, although he does do so along the way and deals with numerous Atheistic arguments. Rather he posits the hypothesis that the God of the Bibl ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jan 01, 2013 Ian Hodge rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: worldview, theology, science

There are poor books, mediocre books, and books that stand out for their clarity and enjoyment. And Who Made God? by Edgar Andrews is in the latter category. This is a response to the New (and old) Atheism by a Christian who is also a scientist. So the argument is both scientific and philosophical, and an excellent balance of both.

The author starts where all good science starts: with definitions. The atheist question, "Who made God?" falls apart once a definition of God which includes his eterna ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 15, 2010 Heather rated it really liked it

This is unlike any book I've read- basically a science/philosophy book proving the existence of God. Andrews discusses some complicated subjects in detail, like quantum mechanics and molecular biology, but does so in a way that (usually!) doesn't overwhelm the lay person. This was fascinating to learn just how science actually proves, not disproves as some believe, the existence of God. ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Nov 22, 2016 Phil rated it it was amazing

Really refreshing to read a writer who clearly loves to laugh and think and poke fun. Andrews has a gift for taking detailed technical jargon and distilling it for public consumption. Chemistry, physics, biology, astronomy, philosophy... pretty much nothing is out-of-bounds. A great read for anyone who loves to think intelligently about big questions.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Nov 27, 2018 Alfonso Alvarez rated it it was amazing

Who made God: Searching for a theory of everything
and What is Man? Adam, alien or ape?

I can safely say that if I wanted to have a really interesting dinner conversation, I would most definitely include Dr. Edgar Andrews on my guest list - a must attend, mind you.

Reading his two books that somehow fit together has afforded me with a good view of his thoughts and his interesting character that make me want to listen to him more, not just to be better informed, but to also be entertained with his b ...more

flag Like · see review

Jan 03, 2016 J.J. Richardson rated it really liked it

Shelves: science-apologetics, favorites

A layman science book with British dry humor.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jul 16, 2018 Trey Tomes rated it liked it · review of another edition

I read this several years ago, and it was probably the first book I read on Christian apologetics. I need to read it again.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Dec 20, 2017 Chris Wray rated it it was amazing

Shelves: 2017, christian

Dr Andrews has written a thorough and compelling apologetic, in which he sets out to "explore how the biblical hypothesis of God provides a comprehensible, intellectually consistent and spiritually satisfying view of being that encompasses man's experience of life, the universe and everything,." This is a novel approach, and the result is a consistently engaging and stimulating book in which complex concepts are explained and analysed in an accessible (and even entertaining) manner, without bein ...more

flag Like · see review

Aug 18, 2017 James Adams rated it it was ok

As a convinced heathen I didn't read this book looking to be persuaded otherwise (although I'm open to any impressive arguments, and still waiting) but I was genuinely interested to see what approach a highly regarded physicist and believer (an understandably rare combination) would take on this subject.
His argumentation and logic are generally tenuous, contrived and flawed. He often resorts to straw man arguments, cherry-picking quotes that don't represent those of the scientific community, pu ...more

flag Like · see review

Sep 15, 2020 Mike Van In rated it really liked it

I don't know what I can add to many of the excellent reviews of this book. As a so-called "creationist", someone who believes the Genesis narrative of God's actions to create all of the universe's physics in the bible, I think that this book is an excellent reference for any creationist who has not yet studied the Creation from a scientific or technical perspective.

I became a convert to creationism around twenty five years ago, after nearly forty years of accepting the "science" of Natural Sele ...more

flag Like · see review

Oct 25, 2018 Peter A. van Tilburg rated it it was amazing

Shelves: origins-of-life

Good book which gives a well thought through ctiricism on the new atheism and the evolutionists. Thinking on how presumptions enter in your reasoning to so called proof is dangerous. I think dr Andrews is sharp on the atheist assumptions. On the other hand he is also clear that there is also a hypothesis on the existence of God and he makes clear why he thinks that hypothesis is likely to be true. Especially the remarks on the probability that is used often in evolutionary considerations combine ...more

flag Like · see review

May 22, 2019 Robb Yandian rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Best of its kind

I’ve read many books by both atheists and Christians arguing against and for the existence of God. What Edgar Andrews does in this book is unique, at least as far as I’ve encountered. He almost treats the subject as a science fair project. He first proposes a hypothesis: the God of the Bible exists. He then examines several aspects of science and humanity to see if they line up with that hypothesis. So, rather than trying to lay out a logical ‘proof’ of God’s existence, he takes ...more

flag Like · see review

May 21, 2017 David Potter rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Who made you?

This book sets out a convincing response to the question of human origins on the basis that the answer is found in understanding God. It stands up to evolution by offering an alternative hypothesis and then proceeds to establish that hypothesis. It's well done. At times the microscopic detail is demanding but working through it brings the reader to firm ground. ...more

flag Like · see review

Dec 09, 2020 Paul Snell rated it it was amazing

As a writer and publisher, I find this book well written, compelling and closely argued. I consider that Andrews has satisfactorily answered the question 'who made God' - and many other questions, to boot! So I give it 5*. ...more

flag Like · see review

Feb 04, 2019 Richard Harris rated it it was amazing

Love the way he makes Science so very readable!

flag Like · see review

Feb 25, 2019 Jaap Tilburg rated it really liked it

Shelves: religion

Good topic. And a good contribution to our thinking.

flag Like · see review

Oct 19, 2020 Melissa rated it it was amazing

Meaty. I tried too hard to read slowly. I read one chapter, set it aside, let it get piled under other books, find it, read one chapter...repeat.

flag Like · see review

Oct 27, 2018 Jan vanTilburg rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy, science, religion

Deceivingly logical. Good in the sense that it made me think. To not take evolution for granted. To acknowledge the mysteries of the origin of the universe and of life.
The consciousness of man.
But the wrapping in a christian bible god explanation makes the book at the very least questionable.

He seems to have points where he argues about the first cause and about the origin of life. That is a mystery. I agree. And the God hypothesis is very plausible there.
Evolution I’m not sure. Same with moral ...more

flag Like · see review

Oct 22, 2010 Jordan rated it it was amazing

Shelves: reviewed-books

Who Made God? is wonderful. Dr. Edgar Andrews is intelligent and knowledgeable enough to discuss a wide variety of scientific disciplines. You may be reading about quantum physics in one chapter and biology or genetics in another. It is to these disciplines and more that Andrews applies the hypothesis of God. If the God of the Bible existed, would we expect to see what we observe in nature and experience in human living? Andrews' conclusion is yes, and his reasoning is sound. Dr. Andrews' creden ...more

flag Like · see review

Mar 15, 2010 Brian rated it really liked it

Shelves: apologetics, science

Mr. Andrews deals through-out the book with many of the positions of the hostile atheistic squad out there today. I struggled a bit following some of the arguments because its not my best nor favorite subject but it was still quite informative and what I did follow was very good, but the thing that struck me was the seriousness of his position, a certain non fundamentalist sanity pervaded his reasoning, he is passionate about the Christian position but he doesn't just gloss over good arguments f ...more

flag Like · see review

May 03, 2014 Nona rated it it was amazing

Shelves: non-fiction, theology

”Starting with the hypothesis of God, Professor Andrews sets out to demonstrate that the existence of the God of the Bible makes better sense of what we can actually learn from science than does atheism. On his way to this conclusion he also points out the scientific and logical inadequacies of evolutionism.”

I am not a science minded person, even the highly simplified explanations of general relativity, quantum mechanics, and string theory, in this book were hard for me to grasp. What I did unde ...more

flag Like · see review

Jul 06, 2016 Dorian Driscoll rated it liked it

A memorable quote:

Reading [Victor] Stenger, anyone ignorant of the Bible would conclude that it teaches a 'flat earth at rest at the centre of a firmament of stars and planets', but nothing could be further from the truth. Stenger sires an orphan child (by Greek science out of Chinese mythology), rejects it, and leaves the baby on the Bible's doorstep. In fact, the Bible is entirely innocent of such teachngs--nowhere does it discuss the shape of the Earth or claim that it lies at the centre of t ...more

flag Like · see review

Aug 04, 2012 John rated it did not like it

Ad Hoc and just so arguments. Achingly silly literalistic applications of Biblical texts to scientific theory. Old Earth creationism has rarely looked so good--Andrews is an entertaining writer--but it just doesn't cohere or make sense. The new atheists make easy targets, and Andrews serves them up. But even this lay person can see that his DNA chapter is weak, weak, weak. Can't remember why I purchased this--probably some friend who thought it would address my views on evolution. But it sure di ...more

flag Like · see review

Apr 11, 2013 Thomas Hunt rated it it was amazing

A wonderful book that points out the fallacy of Darwinian Evolution and backs it scientifically and logically. Of course none of this will matter to the spiritually blind person and they will continue to seek any means possible to discredit the Word of God. No matter how unsuccessful. I am prayerful that The Lord would use such a work as this to open the eyes of possibility to an unbeliever so they might honestly seek the truth of Christ crucified, as well as strengthen the faith of the believer ...more

flag Like · see review

Aug 27, 2010 Greg Wilson rated it liked it

The majority of this book was over my head. I am glad there are people like the author who know this stuff, but the only part I really understood was the occasional humor. I have never understood "String Theory." Now I least I understand why I don't understand it. For a more qualified review click check out http://www.challies.com/book-reviews/... ...more

flag Like · see review

« previous 1 2 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Science

13 users

Religion > Theology

12 users

Philosophy

9 users

Religion

8 users

Christian

7 users

Religion > Christianity

5 users

Nonfiction

5 users

Religion > God

3 users

Spirituality

2 users

Christian > Christian Living

2 users

See top shelves…

About Edgar Andrews

Edgar Andrews

9 followers

Edgar Harold Andrews is an English physicist and Bible-teacher. He is Emeritus Professor of Materials at Queen Mary, University of London and co-pastor of the Campus Church, Welwyn Garden City, UK..

Professionally, he holds a BSc degree in theoretical physics at the University of London (1953), a PhD in applied physics (1960), and a DSc (higher doctorate) in physics (1968).
He is a Fellow of the Ins ...more

Other books in the series

Welwyn Commentary (1 - 10 of 57 books)

Books by Edgar Andrews

La liberté est en Christ (Free in Christ): L'épître de Paul aux Galates

More…

News & Interviews

Meet These Highly Anticipated March Romances

Some people love books. Some people fall in love. And some people fall in love with books about falling in love. Every month our team...

Trivia About Who Made God?: Se...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from Who Made God?: Se...

“The means by which we live have outdistanced the ends for which we live. Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. From a speech by Martin Luther King Jr” — 3 likes

“The claim that, given time, science will explain everything is simply the atheist’s version of the God of the gaps.” — 3 likes

More quotes…

See a Problem?

Preview — Who Made God? by Edgar Andrews

Who Made God?: Searching for a Theory of Everything

(Welwyn Commentary #48)

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Edgar Andrews

Other books in the series

Books by Edgar Andrews

News & Interviews

Trivia About Who Made God?: Se...

Quotes from Who Made God?: Se...