Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Red Cloud at Dawn: Truman, Stalin, and the End of the Atomic Monopoly” as Want to Read:
Red Cloud at Dawn: Truman, Stalin, and the End of the Atomic Monopoly
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Red Cloud at Dawn: Truman, Stalin, and the End of the Atomic Monopoly

3.43  ·  Rating details ·  44 Ratings  ·  7 Reviews
On August 29, 1949, the first Soviet test bomb, dubbed First Lightning, exploded in the deserts of Kazakhstan. The startling event was not simply a technical experiment that confirmed the ability of the Soviet Union to build nuclear bombs during a period when the United States held a steadfast monopoly; it was also an international event that marked the beginning of an arm ...more
Hardcover, 402 pages
Published October 13th 2009 by Farrar Straus Giroux (first published September 29th 2009)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Red Cloud at Dawn, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Red Cloud at Dawn

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Nick Black
Feb 09, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: oppenheimania
well-written and very well-researched, but it just didn't seem to go much of anywhere. lots of speculation and "what ifs" without solid conclusions. if you're a nuclear aficionado, you already know everything in here.

also, at one point he says "thermonuclear weapons fuse hydrogen, helium, and lithium" which the "lithium" there is indirect at best (n+Li->He+T) and the "helium", no, the triple alpha process is not a large contribution to weapon yield, ugh.
Converse
Red cloud at Dawn is a history of the early nuclear weapons era, from about 1945 to 1949, when the Soviet Union ended the American monopoly of the possession of nuclear weapons. The author, Michael D. Gordon, a historian at Princeton University, focuses on home the interactions between the United States and the Soviet Union, particularly their knowledge about each others nuclear programs and their perceptions of each other, influenced their respective actions. Gordon focuses on intelligence, pol ...more
Dustin Hartley
Feb 25, 2017 rated it liked it
I enjoyed the book until about half way through it. Then I lost interest and read the rest of it much too fast. I still feel it deserves three stars.
Leah G
Mar 21, 2013 rated it liked it
Great descriptions of important events of the early nuclear age. Covers Potsdam, the years of American nuclear monopoly and the decisions made on that basis; espionage and its impact (my favorite topic of course), and the results of

This is the only book I have found that explains project Vermont- how did the Americans detect the Soviet's test of their first atomic bomb? (first lightning/Joe-1) It was not inevitable at all and took considerable politicking to get the budget and program and scien
...more
Synthetic Vox
Feb 06, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A lovely read! Classically historian in nature, it seems like Gordin has read (and incorporated) every possible scrap of paper related to the topic. He has made the four years of atomic monopoly interesting, and that is no mean feat. Further, his method highlights that the characteristics of the ways all the key players handled the monopoly carried over to the Cold War years.
Margaret Sankey
Jul 23, 2011 rated it liked it
Technological and diplomatic history, some based on documents declassified in 1995, about who knew what and when and from where--from tentatively breaking the news to Stalin at Potsdam to the Russians testing their own bomb on the Kazakh August steppes in 1949.
GWC
rated it liked it
Jan 10, 2010
Jim
rated it liked it
Mar 28, 2017
C.J. Ruby
rated it it was ok
May 21, 2014
Ian Divertie
Mar 17, 2015 rated it it was amazing
Excellent book!
Jesse Vavrek
rated it it was ok
Apr 22, 2010
Tom V
rated it liked it
Mar 05, 2012
Graham
rated it liked it
Apr 30, 2010
Kierkegaard's Pancakes
rated it really liked it
Sep 26, 2014
Rob Cummings
rated it liked it
Nov 12, 2017
Marek
rated it it was amazing
May 16, 2016
William Risher
rated it really liked it
May 15, 2012
Tom
rated it really liked it
Jan 27, 2010
Matt Jarvis
rated it liked it
Mar 17, 2015
Michael
rated it liked it
Feb 04, 2017
Saboburns
rated it really liked it
May 11, 2017
Marcin
rated it liked it
Oct 18, 2016
Promise
rated it really liked it
Mar 17, 2017
Tracy Thomas
rated it really liked it
Feb 21, 2018
Leonard Lewensohn
rated it really liked it
Jul 18, 2018
M F
rated it really liked it
Nov 02, 2014
Jave Astrid
rated it it was ok
Mar 02, 2013
Greg
rated it did not like it
Sep 18, 2011
Brenna
rated it it was ok
Jun 11, 2014
Daniel A Littman
rated it really liked it
May 04, 2014
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
11 followers
Michael Gordin is Rosengarten Professor of Modern and Contemporary History at Princeton University, where he specializes in the history of modern science. In 2013-4 he served as the inaugural director of the Fung Global Fellows Program. He came to Princeton in 2003 after earning his A.B. (1996) and his Ph.D. (2001) from Harvard University, and serving a term at the Harvard Society of Fellows. In 2 ...more
More about Michael Gordin