What do you think?


Essence of Philosophy
Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911), the great German humanist, remained a towering figure in Europe long into the twentieth century. Published in 1954, this translation by Stephen A. Emery and William T. Emery was the first English translation of Dilthey's Das Wesen der Philosophie (1907) as well as his first work to be translated completely into English, making Dilthey accessible to scholars of the English-speaking world.
- GenresPhilosophy
78 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1907
About the author
Wilhelm Dilthey
263 books76 followersWilhelm Dilthey (German: [ˈdɪltaɪ]) was a German historian, psychologist, sociologist, and hermeneutic philosopher, who held G. W. F. Hegel's Chair in Philosophy at the University of Berlin. As a polymathic philosopher, working in a modern research university, Dilthey's research interests revolved around questions of scientific methodology, historical evidence and history's status as a science. He could be considered an empiricist, in contrast to the idealism prevalent in Germany at the time, but his account of what constitutes the empirical and experiential differs from British empiricism and positivism in its central epistemological and ontological assumptions, which are drawn from German literary and philosophical traditions.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
July 8, 2018
Dilthey writes clearly but this is not an easy book as it appears at first. There are interesting points regarding the possibility of metaphysics, the similarities and differences of the arts and religion in relation to philosophy, the distinction of natural sciences and humanities, and the role of history as an important ingredient to define the “essence of philosophy”. 3/5
August 25, 2025
Segue no mesmo modelo dos outros escritos que li dele. Muita forma, pouco conteúdo. Dilthey realmente não soube desenvolver as suas ideias.
July 24, 2015
It did not discuss worldviews as much as I had hoped.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews



