What do you think?


Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes
The thoughts of three philosophers on three topics: meaning, causality, and objectivity, are the focus of this study.
- GenresPhilosophy
372 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1971
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
September 21, 2025
Bennett's book is a standard reference for the three great historical empiricists, and any student of the movement will find it illuminating and worth reading.
It's primary failure is a rhetorical one. There are barely any opening or closing remarks; Bennett makes an insubstantial attempt to lay out the connection between these three thinkers or what overall lesson one is to learn from examining them. The reader is thrown (after a very few brief paragraphs) directly into a discussion of Locke's theory of meaning, and at the end a dissection of Hume's justification for enduring objects simply seems to stop. The book would have been much clearer had Bennett provided an opening and closing chapter to tie everything together.
It's primary failure is a rhetorical one. There are barely any opening or closing remarks; Bennett makes an insubstantial attempt to lay out the connection between these three thinkers or what overall lesson one is to learn from examining them. The reader is thrown (after a very few brief paragraphs) directly into a discussion of Locke's theory of meaning, and at the end a dissection of Hume's justification for enduring objects simply seems to stop. The book would have been much clearer had Bennett provided an opening and closing chapter to tie everything together.
April 22, 2020
Revolting
Read
November 27, 2020I don't think I understood much of this book so I don't feel qualified to rate it.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews




