Martin's delightful departure (billed as the first lesbian Regency novel) is more in the vein of Jane Austen than contemporary romance novels. The social intricacies of the era are observed: the heroines know each other for months before addressing each other by first name; gossip spread at public balls in the Herefordshire countryside can ruin reputations; and the villains of the story are an arrogant, overbearing brother and propriety rather than some dastardly foe with a complicated scheme.
Amid this simplicity, it was wonderful to read about the growing attachment between new neighbors Lady Joanna Sinclair and Lady Diana March. Who could help but love the unconventional Diana, a woman who is free in her speech, exotic in her attire, and who was once hauled before a court in Alexandria 'on charges of drunk and disorderly conduct, assaulting an officer of the law, liberating a trader's camel, and soliciting the English Ambassador for prostitution'? Joanna's playfulness with her daughter and repressed talent for painting endears her to readers and to Diana.
The slow-building attraction between Joanna & Diana is charming. The secondary characters are suitably amusing. I only wish the happily ever after had given us more time with the heroines, showing readers what their life was like as a family with Joanna's daughter Molly. I would love to read more lesbian Regency novels. Perhaps, like Ms. Martin, I shall have to write what I wish to read.
This was actually a re-read -- I DNF'ed a chapter or two in a few years ago because it was just a little too plotty and not quite character-y enough for me, but I decided I needed to give it another try. I still had a hard time getting emotionally engaged, but I recognized much more to enjoy this time through.
The best thing about this, other than that it's a relatively smoothly written f/f Regency -- to call that rare is the understatement of the three decades since it was written -- is that it is FULL OF QUEERS being friends, mentoring, and supporting each other. *That* was a truly unexpected delight. I have no time anymore for contemporary OR historical books and media that erase our communities and connections with each other. It gets a whole extra star for that, and for being among the better-written and edited offerings from Cleis/Naiad/etc that I've trudged through. (I want to love them. They're just often SO TERRIBLE.)
I loved this book. I enjoy a good Regency romance, and this is the first (and maybe only?) lesbian Regency book I've ever read. Someone should fix that. Maybe me.
Recently I swore off romance novels indefinitely, but alas it seems that I am unable to stay away from queer historicals. In fact, after watching Bridgerton and deciding that I needed something like it but queer, I stumbled upon the first ever lesbian Regency romance... at least, according to Michelle Martin, and I haven't found anything to contradict her.
I planned to read Pembroke Park mostly for historical value, but I ended up enjoying the story on its own merits. It's not perfect, but it's pretty damn fun, with crossdressing and riding astride and plots to foil the scheming of meddling relatives. While there are plenty of frivolity and laughs, there's also consideration of loss and the risks of living and loving in ways that society proscribes, and a lot of leaning on found family that adds emotional weight and a kind of timeless relatability. The good made up for the bad, which in this case is a tendency for problems to resolve too quickly and the least believably-written child I've ever read.
I will definitely suggest this to readers who have exhausted the well-known queer historical writers working today and need a deeper cut.
this book blew my little mind...it was the first lesbian story i ever read. i randomly picked it up at my mother's house, and really i was never there, just one time in 5 years and this is what i stole, just to steal. then when i read it, floored on so many counts.
I wanted the sheer delight of reading a lesbian regency romance to overcome any shortcomings this book had, but.... no such luck. I cringed and eye-rolled a lot. Worst of all I felt little-to-no attachment to the characters. Sigh. (But I do often have this reaction to romance, so I wouldn't say it's much worse than a lot of lesbian romances out there.)
A lovely little lesbian story, where there is homophobia, but the gays aren't beaten down or discouraged and in fact stick it to the homophobes. Happy ending!
If you ask readers for titles of the best lesbian Regency romances they know, Pembroke Park is usually one of the first mentioned. The widowed Lady Joanna Sinclair is irresistably drawn to the mannish Lady Diana March, leader of an eccentric social set that includes Joanna’s brother-in-law and his “very good friend” Geoffrey. But pursuing a friendship with Diana sets Joanna at odds with her overbearing brother Hugo, and Joanna’s insistance on not re-marrying at her brother’s command places the custody of her young daughter in jeopardy.
This is a light and somewhat formulaic romance, though not without its serious moments. But the prose is smooth and polished and there are enough sub-plots and side characters to carry the story along. One definite plus is the way Joanna and Diana’s developing relationship is situated as part of a community of same-sex lovers, both male and female.
This wasn’t the best written book and there were some things that I didn’t like, but at the end of the day it’s a LESBIAN REGENCY ROMANCE and there is lovely co-mom-ing and lots of animals!! It also did a really good job of emphasizing community and the importance of intergenerational queer support networks which was really nice!
I have to agree with all the reviews I've seen--a fun, funny tidbit that I can't really give five stars, but it's so hard not to like. It's just so damn charming that I want to ignore them entirely. If I'd grown up with this on my bookshelf I can imagine it having a dramatic effect on me.
Not perfect but really worth reading. Somehow better than 90% of contemporary attempts at same.