Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination” as Want to Read:
The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination

4.19  ·  Rating details ·  2,896 Ratings  ·  109 Reviews
This pathbreaking book of feminist criticism is now reissued with a substantial new introduction by Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar that reveals the origins of their revolutionary realization in the 1970s that "the personal was the political, the sexual was the textual.

Author Biography: Sandra M. Gilbert is professor of English at the University of California at Davis. Susa

Paperback, 733 pages
Published September 10th 1980 by Yale University Press (first published 1980)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Madwoman in the Attic, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Charlotte McDonald I know for sure it references Jane Eyre but I don't know for sure beyond that.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
Have you ever been bothered by that host of angelically drippy Dickensian heroines? Been more satisfied by the sassy alternatives offered by Jane Eyre or Elizabeth Bennet, but couldn’t pin down exactly why? Wondered what the hell is up with Wuthering Heights? Thought Eve was shafted?

Well, act now to order your official Madwoman-in-the-Attic Goggles. Put them on, and literature will never look the same.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one, but there has been this confining social dichotomy that women
May 13, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: feminism
The imagination of the title is the boundary of Gilbert and Gubar's reflections, and some qualifications might be added to define the limits and orientation of that imagination, such as whiteness and the English language. All of the women writers they discuss as foremothers and proponents of a specifically female literary culture are white and either English or USian (correct me if I err). Of course it is necessary to have a focus, to delineate a subject for enquiry, but it is important to note ...more
Nov 17, 2012 rated it liked it
Recommended to Stela by: Carmen Irimia

I keep thinking that feminism (or every other political or social movement by the way) is a narrow path to follow in a literary analysis. As part of a thorough study, literature is an interesting enough source of feminist examples, and Simone de Beauvoir used it brilliantly in The Second Sex, but the reverse is not equally advisable.

For, in my opinion, The Madwoman in the Attic forces, like Procust once upon a time, an entire literature written by 19th century women to sleep in the bed of the f
Tamara Agha-Jaffar
The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination forges a ground-breaking contribution to feminist literary criticism. In this study, Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar argue for the existence of a distinctly female literary imagination in women writers of nineteenth-century. Their landmark study has influenced how we read women writers ever since.

Gilbert and Gubar systematically deconstruct the obstacles women authors faced and how their struggles are
Amanda May
Aug 01, 2011 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is what my thesis adviser has called the quintessential text about Victorian women writers, and I find that statement to be absolutely true. Gilbert and Gubar begin with a generalized argument that women writers have a counterpart to the masculine "anxiety of influence" discussed by Harold Bloom. Instead, women undergo an "anxiety of authorship" because unlike male writers, women have no predecessors to emulate. Instead, women, particularly nineteenth century female writers, tended to modif ...more
Feb 26, 2015 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition

Although I did not always agree the authors or saw where they were going and why it was certainly...enlightening. A great piece of feminist criticism that is very useful when you study Literature and constantly have to write term papers. Many secondary sources refer to Gilbert & Gubar's "Madwoman" and it was interesting to see and understand why exactly it is perceived as such an important piece.
Aug 27, 2008 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Sarah by: school Assignment
The Madwoman in the Attic The Madwoman in the Attic struck one of the first blows for feminist literary criticism and a uniquely female literary tradition. It's near and dear to my heart because it's the first extended lit-crit I've ever read, and also because it's about my favorite bunch of novels: Victorian (well, 19th century) women's fiction. There's also an awesome section on Victorian poetry. Hellooo, Goblin Market!

The basic theory of the book is that women writers twisted the Madonna/who
“Is a pen a metaphorical penis?”

Thus begins, rather perfectly, this seminal (oblique phallic pun alert!) work in feminist literary theory.

I wish I’d read this during my senior year in college, when I was writing my thesis on Woolf and her portrayal of women artists; I’d have been utterly riveted. (In fact, I’m somewhat surprised my thesis adviser didn’t encourage me to read this book for general context, as important as it is.) So, yes, this tome marks a very important moment in feminist lit th
Feb 11, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: 2017-nonfiction
This book has been on my TBR for a while after it has been recommended in so many lectures. And no wonder because this book was incredibly detailed account on the most important women writes in 19th century UK and America. I felt a bit underwhelmed at some points but I think it was more because I am not very well known with the theories the book discussed than that this was a badly written book. Having read most of the novels that were discussed in the book, this opened the whole new view of man ...more
Jul 09, 2011 rated it really liked it
This was a fascinating read and gave me a deeper insight into some of my favourite pieces of nineteenth century literature. Gilbert and Gubar explore in detail the work of a wide variety of authors such as Austen, the Bronte's, Eliot, Dickinson, Rossetti, and Shelley. It's a huge tome of a book so does require a bit of a commitment to reading it, but I believe it is thoroughly worth it. It was a ground breaking book for feminist criticism at the time and will inform and influence the way in whic ...more
Nov 30, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: borrowed, phd
I didn't get chance to read this in full unfortunately, but what I did read (largely the parts about Woolf) were very interesting indeed. It's certainly a book which I hope to be able to pick up and read from cover to cover at some point in the near future, as there is certainly a lot which intrigued me here.
Leslee Friedman
Mar 27, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I know this is considered passe by most of the lit crit set, particularly post-colonial theorists. That said, it changed my life. And I really think that it's one of the best places a girl can start reading about feminist theory, even if she leaves behind this school of thinking later. If nothing else, the first essay in the book is worth a read.
Sue Davis
Really helpful for understanding Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre
Lukas Evan
Mar 04, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: feminism, crit-theory
Somehow I missed out on feminist literary criticism during my undergraduate English classes.
Jul 29, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
He tardado en leerlo por que me ha pillado en una racha donde me he volcado más con el manga y no conseguía concentrarme en el tren porque me quedaba dormida, pero eso no es demérito de este ensayo.

Por que este libro es indispensable si te gusta la literatura decimonónica escrita por mujeres (Austen, las Brontë, etc...). Eso sí, (el único punto negativo, que no es per se negativo) si quieres abarcar totalmente la exposición de las autoras recomiendo leer toda la obra de las escritoras de las que
Cris Vallejo
Feb 16, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Sólo puedo decir que maravilloso se queda corto. A pesar de que la lectura se me ha alargado más de lo que me hubiera gustado este libro sin duda merece relectura. Con él he podido ampliar los conceptos básicos sobre los orígenes del feminismo, conocer a algunos autores con más detalle o incluso descubrir autores nuevos como es el caso de Anne Finch.

Uno de los conceptos que más me ha gustado ha sido la explicación que se da sobre la oposición entre ángel-monstruo con la que se representaba la fi
Ann-Cathrine (Literamour)
Wow! No wonder this is a crucial text in literary feminism. It covers a massive amount of works by 19th century English and American female writers with traces up to Virginia Woolf and Sylvia Plath.
I have discovered gems through this book which I had previously avoided or not found interesting (Little Women) as well as developing a deeper appreciation for the Brontë's, whose works I did not enjoy reading but I acknowledge their deep impact upon the literary world - and even more so now. in fact,
Carol Douglas
Jun 20, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I just re-read this important book on nineteenth-century women writers. It's so beautifully written and full of interesting analysis that I can hardly do justice to it.
Nineteenth-century women wrote in a world steeped in even more male bias than women face today. They "told all the truth but told it slant," as Emily Dickenson said. Even, no especially, Jane Austen's work was full of complaints about men's belittling women and control of what was deemed "literature."
There are illuminating cha
Mar 19, 2009 rated it it was amazing
I've been reading this for some time, and decided to go back to it after reading Showalter's new book. I don't always agree with the authors, but generally find their analysis thought-provoking.

Update: well, I've finished, and as mentioned before, I read this over a long period of time and in some cases came back to it because I read the work in question (I reread Wuthering Heights and The Goblin Market both last year). In other cases, I wish I'd read the work more recently (as with Shirley and
Carla Remy
I thought I liked seminal 1970s feminist literary criticism, but it was too much. I mean, if you haven't just read the books they're covering it's hard to follow. I've read "frankenstein" - 20 years ago. I've read all the Austen novels, but at least a decade ago. I can't recall every character, every nuance. So this just made me feel it was time to do some re-reading. I was looking forward to the "wuthering heights" chapter, and it was good, but it helps that I've read WH 4 times. I gave up befo ...more
Nov 07, 2010 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The 600+ page tome of dense literary criticism is not for the lighthearted and, to be honest, I would not recommend reading it straight through. Gilbert and Gubar fail to deliver on their promised thesis of the overarching theme of angel versus monster in texts written by female authors in the nineteenth century.

That said, if you've read the books they're discussing, it can be fascinating. My favorite parts by far were the take down of the Snow White tale and the chapters on Wuthering Heights, J
Aug 26, 2007 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I took a Female Gothic course in Scotland one year, and this book became my Bible. It was chock full of information about novels written by females in the nineteenth-century. However, that just scratches the surface as Madwoman also rebels against the phallocentric standards that existed in the time of the great female authors such as Bronte, Austen, Shelley, etc.

Gilbert and Gubar have done amazing jobs analyzing and critiquing the Gothic novels and exploring the madwomen that exist within not
Aug 08, 2015 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction, writing
I am sure this was groundbreaking when it came out, but I felt many of the views (and conclusions the authors arrive at) are dated, and the first sentence goes something like "Is the pen a metaphorical penis?" I'm unable to take that seriously. This book seemed to lack the cool headed tone that I look for in non-fiction work. I was not reading this as one might study a textbook, which is maybe how it's meant to be read. Possibly I was expecting too much of it.
Brenda Clough
Jan 06, 2015 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
An excellent book, full of insight! You do have to know the works in question. Luckily the volume is divided out more or less by the books analyzed, so you can skip the George Eliot section if you haven't read MIDDLEMARCH.
I was thrilled by the analysis of JANE EYRE, and can see why this was seminal.
Captain Sir Roddy, R.N. (Ret.)
This is an absolutely indispensable and priceless book. You can skip about and fall in love with each and every chapter in this book! So incredibly enlightening. Gilbert is brilliant!
Nicole G.
Apr 19, 2015 marked it as 0-unfinished  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2015
So this book has shown me that I am woefully ill-read with regard to 19th century literature particularly by women. Need to change that and perhaps pick this book up again.
Apr 16, 2008 marked it as to-read
Shelves: 19th-century
A book about the books I love. Nearly all the reviews of this are glowing or life changing. It would be a shame to miss out on it.
Dana Stabenow
Oct 11, 2008 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Where does feminist literature come from? There was a there there.
May 08, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
See my review on my book blog:
Aug 31, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
pg 336-371. Used for feminist analysis of Jane Eyre. Facinating read. From what I have read, this is a must read for anyone with an incline to want to analyse texts. The way it has highlighted and enhanced Jane Eyre as a read,for me,is marvelous. The fact we are doing feminism as coursework is a blessing as its such an important topic and this really gripped onto the aspects of Jane Eyre percieved that way.Will mostly refer to it once I have read more texts the book refers to, as I would feel it ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists From Brontë to Lessing
  • Literary Women
  • How to Suppress Women's Writing
  • Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel
  • The Brontë Myth
  • Idols of Perversity: Fantasies of Feminine Evil in Fin-de-Siècle Culture
  • Sexual Politics
  • Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England
  • Women and Writing
  • Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire
  • Sexual / Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory
  • Is Heathcliff a Murderer?: Great Puzzles in Nineteenth-Century Fiction
  • Writing a Woman's Life
  • The Rise of the Novel, Updated Edition
  • Imagining Characters: Six Conversations About Women Writers: Jane Austen, Charlotte Bronte, George Eliot, Willa Cather, Iris Murdoch, and Toni Morrison
  • This Sex Which Is Not One
  • Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution
  • Anatomy of Criticism
Sandra M. Gilbert is the author of numerous volumes of criticism and poetry, as well as a memoir. She is coeditor (with Susan Gubar) of The Norton Anthology of Literature by Women. A Distinguished Professor of English emerita at the University of California, Davis, she lives in Berkeley, California.
More about Sandra M. Gilbert...
“A life of feminine submission, of 'contemplative purity,' is a life of silence, a life that has no pen and no story, while a life of female rebellion, of 'significant action,' is a life that must be silenced, a life whose monstrous pen tells a terrible story.” 6 likes
“A life of feminine submission, of 'contemplative purity,' a life of silence, a life that has no pen and no story, while a life of female rebellion, of 'significant action,' is a life that must be silenced, a life whose monstrous pen tells a terrible story.” 1 likes
More quotes…