What do you think?


Applied Combinatorics
This is a revision of a one-semester survey of combinatorial analysis and graph theory, designed for mathematics and computer science majors. Three principal aspects of combinatorial reasoning are emphasized in this book: the systematic analysis of different possibilities, the exploration of the logical structure of a problem, and ingenuity. Keeping theory to a minimum, it uses numerical examples to demonstrate the combinatorial reasoning involved in computer science, operations research, and finite probability. This edition gives more attention to computer science's use of combinatorics. Includes a new chapter on topics in theoretical computer science, a new section on recursive programs, an enlarged discussion of algorithms to generate combinatorial sets, and additional programming exercises.
447 pages, Hardcover
First published December 31, 1978
About the author
Alan Tucker
78 books16 followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
January 10, 2014
Alan Tucker was my professor in college. Combinatorics and Graph Theory were my absolute favorite subjects.
September 7, 2022
The maths high key slays, bought like 2 years ago but haven't finished it
January 28, 2016
This was just an okay textbook. There are sections of this book that are very well written (when you get into the actual start of the Combinatorics section, the author does a fantastic job of introducing the subject, provides a LOT of examples, and really does a great job of explaining what is a tough subject to many people.
But there are sections that are just terribly done. The section on non-homogeous recurrence relations was very vague, and the examples were a bit poor. The early sections covering edge and vertex covers also weren't very well explained (especially given that easier solutions using logic formulas exist).
So, overall, not a terrible book, but it could definitely use some improvement.
But there are sections that are just terribly done. The section on non-homogeous recurrence relations was very vague, and the examples were a bit poor. The early sections covering edge and vertex covers also weren't very well explained (especially given that easier solutions using logic formulas exist).
So, overall, not a terrible book, but it could definitely use some improvement.
March 20, 2008
Good problems, but bad explanations.
Read
January 24, 2010math
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews


