An Interesting but Ultimately Frustrating Read (3/5)
I'm always up for learning something new in history, especially about underserved conflicts in history. However, I walked away from this book a bit underwhelmed by what I assumed would be a bit of a deeper dive into the horrors of war.
What Worked for Me: I think there are some okay pieces in how the story progresses. While the translation is rough at best, the author gives a good attempt at painting the archetypes of people in war. These include the fallen honorable man given into his more basal urges, the opportunists in both the army and citizenry reveling in the chaos, and the stoic Seargent struggling to carry the weight of others' actions. These are all pretty well done. However, that's about where my praise stops.
What Didn't Work For Me: The male lead's characterization is hard to describe as anything but "self-deprecative self-insert power fantasy." The character continually describes themselves as smarter, faster, stronger, more willful, and the like. And the story plays out as if those things are always accurate. The same thing for the way the side characters view them. For the main character, Gvozden, he's pretty much good at everything except being quick to anger. Except even that is a superpower that allows him to "out-will" his superior officers and even intelligence agents. Note, some of this plays into the "opportunists" line above, but a lot of it is very cringy. There's also a point where he realizes what he's trying to save is lost. In one of the quickest 180s of a character I've read, he decides to take everything he bases himself upon and throw it out the window to become a "thousand-page long indictment" criminal: raping, pillaging, and killing with a colonel's unofficial sanction. People can snap, sure. But the building up of this character's anger issues and otherwise familial / personal perfections isn't what I would consider foreshadowing (it was to me because it was the only obvious way a story like this could go). In the end, what could have been a more in-depth exploration of falling into these depraved actions, starting to stand on cultural or political lines, etcetera is lost. Instead, the character stands alone as a monstrous paragon against the divisors (religious fanatics, politicians, nationalists, etcetera). It's a wasted opportunity.
The Gist of It: "I Hate My Brother" is a frustrating read which starts with a reasonably great premise. It's a short book, so overall still worth reading as a quick junk food snack. However, the characterization, lack of depth, and strange turns of the plot make this something hard for me to recommend beyond that. In the end, I'm left with the same feelings I got looking at Game of Thrones, Season 8, Episode 5 (the part where everyone stops fighting, then started turning rapey / kill-happy at the drop of a hat). The story's potential lied in exploring where those old cultural divides existed, delving into how a simple man that believed in unity gave into those selfsame divisions. Alas, it was not to be.