370 books
—
547 voters
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “What Is the Name of This Book?” as Want to Read:
What Is the Name of This Book?
by
If you're intrigued by puzzles and paradoxes, these 200 mind-bending logic puzzles, riddles, and diversions will thrill you with challenges to your powers of reason and common sense. Raymond M. Smullyan — a celebrated mathematician, logician, magician, and author — presents a logical labyrinth of more than 200 increasingly complex problems. The puzzles delve into Gödel’s u
...more
Paperback, 256 pages
Published
October 15th 1986
by Touchstone Books
(first published 1978)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
What Is the Name of This Book?,
please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about What Is the Name of This Book?
Community Reviews
Showing 1-30
I first read about Smullyan in one of Martin Gardner's books of mathematical puzzles. I'm a fool for torturing my brain with convoluted conundrums, so when I found a copy, I was overjoyed. I devoured it in a week, and was not disappointed.
This book contains Smullyan's famous logic puzzles about knights (who always say the truth) and knaves (who always lie) and all interesting combinations thereof. Apart from providing intellectual fixes for maths junkies, this book actually teaches logic through ...more
This book contains Smullyan's famous logic puzzles about knights (who always say the truth) and knaves (who always lie) and all interesting combinations thereof. Apart from providing intellectual fixes for maths junkies, this book actually teaches logic through ...more
Let's get the simple stuff out of the way: Yes, this is largely a book of Smullyan's well-known Knights and Knaves puzzles. However, it has a lot more.
Beginning and ending sections include jokes about logic and logicians that teach a huge amount about logic itself. A section in the back teaches about Godel's Theorem in a simple way anyone can understand (perhaps more elegantly than Hoftadter did, perhaps not). He gives a feeling for what logic is and why we understand it the way we do.
But back ...more
Beginning and ending sections include jokes about logic and logicians that teach a huge amount about logic itself. A section in the back teaches about Godel's Theorem in a simple way anyone can understand (perhaps more elegantly than Hoftadter did, perhaps not). He gives a feeling for what logic is and why we understand it the way we do.
But back ...more
A really excellent set of puzzles, for which I have only minor complaints: first, they tend to be easy, medium, or impossible. (I don't particularly enjoy the open-ended ones, like "what would you say." But I think it's just a time thing--if I can solve the problem in 2-5 minutes, that's just fun. If I have to put in REAL time, then I feel like I should be doing some actual work.) Also, the set of puzzles involving insane vs. sane, liars vs. truth-tellers I could never wrap my mind around. It's
...more
Fascinating book for all of us that love a good logic challenge.
Great book, nicely written and with that bit of humor that everyone could enjoy.
This is a nice book, one oldie but still a good reading.
Great book, nicely written and with that bit of humor that everyone could enjoy.
This is a nice book, one oldie but still a good reading.
If you're a die hard fan of logical puzzles or if you want to gain the knowledge in that area, only and only then, this is the book for you. The puzzles get harder and harder at each step... Sometimes you might get frustrated for taking up the same things from a bit variation, or the monotomy of the scenes, but still, a great collection of variations of Knights and Knaves and Portia's Caskets' puzzles.
A couple of things I noticed which would really help:
1. Try to take it up with a clear mind. ...more
A couple of things I noticed which would really help:
1. Try to take it up with a clear mind. ...more
This was an entertaining collection of puzzles, with some logic being explicitly taught along the way.
The final Part was generally very different in tone from the rest, and the description of Gödel's actual work could have done with more unpacking, I feel. So if you're after intuitive understanding of those theorems, I could not recommend this as a sole source.
Also worth noting: the book certainly shows its age with the exoticism and implied casual sexism.
The final Part was generally very different in tone from the rest, and the description of Gödel's actual work could have done with more unpacking, I feel. So if you're after intuitive understanding of those theorems, I could not recommend this as a sole source.
Also worth noting: the book certainly shows its age with the exoticism and implied casual sexism.
Lots of good puzzles, but a bit repetitive. I don't need 20 knights & knaves problems.
First brush with Gödel's incompleteness theorem. Wasn't expecting that from a recreational puzzle book.
This 1978 book about logic and logic puzzles made my brain work! But this book is funny too and lighthearted. And the solutions are in words not formulas or truth tables.
Nov 13, 2012
Dimitris Hall
rated it
liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
unique-little-discoveries,
funny
In this popular puzzle, a man has committed a crime punishable by death. He is to make a statement. If the statement is true, he is to be drowned; if the statement is false, he is to be hanged. What statement should he make to confound his executioner?
I got this book after reading The Tao Is Silent and deciding that Mr. Raymond Smullyan must be one of my favourite people out there. A logician, a magician, a pianist, a Taoist and a mathematician? (it rhymes!)
What Is The Name Of This Book? (link ...more
I got this book after reading The Tao Is Silent and deciding that Mr. Raymond Smullyan must be one of my favourite people out there. A logician, a magician, a pianist, a Taoist and a mathematician? (it rhymes!)
What Is The Name Of This Book? (link ...more
Raymond Smullyan is - IMO - the most fun and creative logician who ever existed. I have always loved his books and this is no exception. It is one of his earlier ones and has a great mix of logic problems (Knights who tell the truth, Knaves who lie - sane and insane humans and vampires) as well as some talk about paradox and it concludes with his trying to make Godel's incompleteness theorem accessible to non-mathematicians.
Okay - for that last part he failed since I still don't understand it. A ...more
Okay - for that last part he failed since I still don't understand it. A ...more
This book start gently but quickly escalates in difficulty, however it is always written with very careful consideration of the beginners view of things. Some sentences need to be re-read 10, 20 times, but the resources are there for you to understand the concepts presented, so long as one is careful and patient. Using vivid imaginative scenarios (Alice, Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Doo; islands of Knights and Knaves; islands of insane vampires and sane vampires) Smullyan builds up the e
...more
I am not a logical thinker by nature, yet I recognize that logic is a useful tool in practical everyday problem solving. This is why I hold this book in high regard. It is also refreshing to read something that deals with exact things. There is a certain kind of pleasure in achieving an end instead of getting lost in vague ideas, glimpses.
I only give it four due to the fact that it's a great tool, but it doesn't excite me or lead me to an exciting world. It's a refreshing and grounding activit ...more
I only give it four due to the fact that it's a great tool, but it doesn't excite me or lead me to an exciting world. It's a refreshing and grounding activit ...more
An excellent introduction to logic, written in the form of puzzles. Unfortunately, my copy had too many translation errors and some sections (especially the bit about vampires/humans and "believing" stuff) were just impossible to decipher. So the biggest riddle is: did the author explain it badly or did the translator muddle it up? (Given the amount of corrections I've scribbled in the margins, I'll give professor Smullyan the benefit of doubt...) I'd love to read it in English, so maybe I'll fi
...more
Delightful book of logic puzzles mentioned by Martin Gardner in his Penrose Tiles to Trapdoor Ciphers and the Return of Dr. Matrix. I checked OpenLibrary.org (awesome resource!) and downloaded/borrowed a copy. Kept me company on a flight from Dalkas to New York while the guy behind never stopped talking the entire trip. Talking loudly. But this was as I said, delightful.
If you like riddles that are based on stupid wordplay then you'll like this. I expected it to be a series of logical tests that grew harder and harder, each one giving you a bit more information about the next and leading you to cracking a big mystery at the end. No such luck. Instead there are pages of historical anecdotes from the author and a number of irritating riddles that basically stink of smug. Ick.
This book was so much fun when I read it, that, by the time I had finished it I found the nerve to admmit: I'm a nerd. :)
But, seriously: If you like logic puzzles, you'll like this book for sure. Smullyan is a very funny author and all his works are permeated by his lighthearted spirit and creativity.
But, seriously: If you like logic puzzles, you'll like this book for sure. Smullyan is a very funny author and all his works are permeated by his lighthearted spirit and creativity.
I use this to set logical puzzles to my Philosophy Students at school and it is excellent for that with a good range of difficulties. Some need updating in language (do we refer to people as normals?; some gender ideas implicit are not of the 21st Century), but there is no difficulty in tweaking casket for pirate's chest etc.
The book was OK, but I expected a different sort of logical puzzles. They were monotonous and sometimes boring. Some of the problems were complex and solving them was interesting to me, but I may not read another book with no story in it again.
Silly puzzles and riddles I used to do when I was a kid. I think they would still be a fantastic waste of time. If only I could go back and unfigure out the answers first...
I kept the book because sometimes people ask these types of questions during job interviews, btw.
I kept the book because sometimes people ask these types of questions during job interviews, btw.
recommended by Scott Aaronson when I asked if there had been any investigation into why truth is such a mathematically strange concept.
Fairly well written with many good mind stretching puzzles, and a few relatively familiar ones.
Whew, that was a doozy.
A trying test of logic.
Great introduction to logic puzzles by a man who made a lifelong career out of them.
The Finnish translation had too many errors...
Raymond Smullyan is my Logician Dumbledore. I own and read every book of his I can get my hands on. Which is well over a dozen.
Brain trainning? Lets go to the olympic brainiac games.
It's monotonous and boring after few pages... Puzzles are in easy or medium category..
I was doing alright with the Knights and Knaves, but when they started forming clubs I got pretty lost.
| topics | posts | views | last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Please help me find this book | 1 | 1 | May 16, 2019 04:50PM | |
| 2 twins; one guy is good and the other bad. Bad twin just got out of jail and wants to ruin good twin's life. Inadvertently murders a mob boss' daughter. | 1 | 1 | May 07, 2019 11:52AM | |
| Crime novel about wine shop owner & jack russell | 1 | 1 | Dec 05, 2018 08:17PM | |
| Would you recommend books on technology addiction ? | 2 | 3 | Nov 01, 2018 04:29AM | |
| Fantasy? A boy is an apprentice to an old man who is a creature handler | 1 | 1 | Feb 11, 2018 02:52PM | |
| What’s the name of this book, please?:) | 1 | 1 | Jan 14, 2018 08:58PM | |
| Trying to remember book title | 1 | 1 | Jan 12, 2018 02:11PM |
